This website works best with a newer web browser such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Microsoft Edge. Internet Explorer is not supported by this website.

Day Night Band imagery of the Park Fire in California

The Park Fire developed to the northeast of Chico California on 24 July. Day Night Band visible (0.7 µm) imagery, below (from here), shows the fire over the course of the next four days. It grew very quickly on the 25th and 26th. It appears that by the overnight hours... Read More

The Park Fire developed to the northeast of Chico California on 24 July. Day Night Band visible (0.7 µm) imagery, below (from here), shows the fire over the course of the next four days. It grew very quickly on the 25th and 26th. It appears that by the overnight hours on the 28th that the fire was not burning quite so intensely. The fire persisted through the 29th however.

NOAA-20 Day Night Band Visible (0.7 µm) imagery, 24-29 July 2024 (Click to enlarge)

Geosphere True Color imagery (direct link to animation, starting with just a bit of pre-sunrise Night Microphysics to highlight regions where active burning continues) show an extensive smoke pall associated with the fire. The True Color imagery also hints at the large burn scar from the fire.

Geosphere true color imagery, 1300-2020 UTC on 28 July 2024

This website shows model forecasts of smoke. The predictions valid at 1000 UTC on 28 July 2024, below, show near-surface smoke and total column integrated smoke. The smoke plume from the Park Fire is moving northeastward into central Canada. Most of the smoke beyond California and Nevada has been lofted away from the surface.

7-h forecast valid 10 UTC on 28 July 2024 showing Near-Surface Smoke and Column-Integrated Smoke (Click to enlarge)

The NGFS Real Earth display of the GeoColor imagery and detected fire pixels for 27 and 30 July 2024, shown below, shows the reduction in the size of the active fire.

NGFS depiction of active fire pixels and Geocolor imagery showing the smoke plume, 0220 UTC on 27 July (top) and 30 July (bottom), 2024 (Click to enlarge)

The toggle below of NOAA-20 False Color imagery derived from VIIRS imagery at this website, between 22 and 29 July 2024, shows a very large burn scar (in brown) from the Park Fire. Burn scars from previous fires are also scattered throughout the image.

False Color imagery over Northern California, 22 and 29 July 2024 (Click to enlarge)

View only this post Read Less

Clear skies over the Great Lakes

A clear night over the Great Lakes — associated with a large High Pressure System, shown below in the 0600 UTC Surface Analysis — allowed a high-resolution view of Lake Surface Temperatures. There are thin filaments of colder waters hugging different coastlines: the eastern shore of Lake Michigan, the western... Read More

NOAA-20 VIIRS Day Night Band visible (0.7 µm) imagery over the Great Lakes, 0811 UTC on 26 July 2024 (Click to enlarge)

A clear night over the Great Lakes — associated with a large High Pressure System, shown below in the 0600 UTC Surface Analysis — allowed a high-resolution view of Lake Surface Temperatures. There are thin filaments of colder waters hugging different coastlines: the eastern shore of Lake Michigan, the western shore of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, the southern shore of Manitoulin Island in northern Lake Huron. In these regions, off-shore winds are likely causing deeper (colder) sub-surface waters to upwell. The National Weather Service in Duluth noticed a similar event on 23 July (link to Twitter/X).

Do you think those surface temperatures are warmer than normal as a whole? The purple enhancement over Lake Superior shows temperatures cooler than 60oF. Michigan and Huron show temperatures around 70oF (green) except for Saginaw Bay, where it’s in the mid-70s. Western Lake Erie is 77-78 oF; Lake Ontario is around 75oF at its warmest point. GLERL maintains line plots of basin-wide averages: Superior, Michigan, Huron, Erie and Ontario. All five lakes are warmer on 25 July than the long-term average.

Surface Analysis, 0600 UTC on 26 July 2024 (Click to enlarge)

View only this post Read Less

Typhoon Gaemi and Taiwan

Typhoon Gaemi took a very unusual path on its route to a landfall along the eastern shore of Taiwan on 24 July 2024. HImawari-9 Clean Window infrared (Band 13, 10.4 µm) target scene imagery, below, (here is a shorter animation (animated gif) animation than the mp4 below) shows the storm... Read More

Typhoon Gaemi took a very unusual path on its route to a landfall along the eastern shore of Taiwan on 24 July 2024. HImawari-9 Clean Window infrared (Band 13, 10.4 µm) target scene imagery, below, (here is a shorter animation (animated gif) animation than the mp4 below) shows the storm moving northwest, then west, then south along the east coast of Taiwan before looping into the coast and making landfall. By the end of the animation (2252 UTC on 24 July), the storm has moved off the northwest coast of Taiwan. The unusually wobbly path is also very apparent in this radar animation (courtesy Brian McNoldy (Univ of Miami))

Himawari-9 Clean Window infrared imagery (Band 13, 10.4 µm), 0929 UTC 23 July 2024 – 2252 UTC 24 July 2024 (mp4 animation)

Microwave imagery at 0923 UTC on 24 July 2024, below, taken from the SSEC Tropical Weather Website, show a well-defined eye with rainbands surrounding the storm. Shear values (850-200 mb) are also plotted on the image and are small over the storm.

Total Precipitable Water fields (source) for the 24 hours ending at 1300 UTC on 24 July 2024 show Gaemi embedded within a region of rich moisture over the Western Pacific Ocean basin. However, by the end of the animation, dryer air from Asia is starting to wrap into the southern part of the storm circulation.

Hourly estimates of Total Precipitable Water, 1400 UTC 23 July – 1300 UTC 24 July 2024 (Click to enlarge)

Gaemi’s future path takes it over mainland China.

View only this post Read Less

How Small of a Rocket Signature can GOES “see”?

There are many examples of NOAA‘s GOES ABI detecting the spectral signatures of large rockets. These include GOES-S, GOES-T, GOES-U, GOES-U boosters, Starliner, Falcon 9, Ariane, Himawari-9, Antares, etc. If the rocket is large enough, there is often a signal in each of the 16 ABI bands. Of course the timing of the ABI scan... Read More

There are many examples of NOAA‘s GOES ABI detecting the spectral signatures of large rockets. These include GOES-S, GOES-T, GOES-U, GOES-U boosters, Starliner, Falcon 9, Ariane, Himawari-9, Antares, etc. If the rocket is large enough, there is often a signal in each of the 16 ABI bands. Of course the timing of the ABI scan needs to correspond to the times of the rocket’s brightest / hottest phases, which is more likely if there’s a meso-scale sector covering the area of interest, either at 1-min or 30-second cadence.

Smaller rockets, such as the Firefly, may be be an order of magnitude darker/cooler compared to a Falcon, given their very different maximum thrust. The Firefly maximum rocket thrust is approximately 165,000 lbf (pound-force) [736.1 kN] and the Falcon 9 is about 1,700,000 lbf [7,000 kN].

Firefly on July 4th

Late on July 3rd (local time, early July 4th UTC) there was a Firefly rocket launch from Vandenberg Air Force base.

Launched at 12:04 am EDT on July 5th.

Given the smaller rocket size, a fair question is if it can be seen by the GOES ABI. Often the “Meso 1” sector from GOES-West covers most of California (the default location for this sector). This was the case on July 3, into July 4, 2024. A first look at the 16 spectral bands on the ABI, using default enhancements, shows no discernible rocket plume signature. (The signal of the explosion on the maiden Firefly rocket flight was seen by each band of the ABI.)

The 16 bands of the GOES-18 ABI with 1-min imagery on July 4, 2024. (Click to Play)

Yet, a highly-enhanced (stretched) ABI band 5 (1.61 micrometers) showed a glimpse of the rocket launch. (Some instrument noise is also seen.)

Animation of NOAA’s GOES-18 ABI highly enhanced Band 5 (1.6 micrometer) on July 4, 2024. (Click to Play)

The rocket signature is more evident in the nighttime micro-physics RGB combination. Watch near the coast for the first signature.

GOES-18 nighttime micro-physics RGB on July 4, 2024.

While it’s hard to tell, there may be some indication of the plume in the 11-12 micrometer split window difference from the CONUS sectors.

H/T

The GOES ABI data was accessed via the UW/SSEC Data Services. McIDAS-X, geo2grid and AWIPS software were used to generate the images. More UW/CIMSS Satellite Blogs associated with rocket signatures. T. Schmit works for NOAA/NESDIS/STAR and is stationed in Madison, WI.

View only this post Read Less