This website works best with a newer web browser such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Microsoft Edge. Internet Explorer is not supported by this website.

Flooding along portions of the Mississippi River

A comparison of a Landsat-8 False Color Red-Green-Blue (RGB) image and the GOES-16 River Flood Areal Extent product near the confluence of the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers as viewed using RealEarth (above) showed areas of river flooding in the Cape Girardeau, Missouri and Cairo, Illinois areas on 01 June 2019.The... Read More

Landsat-8 False Color RGB images + GOES-16 River Flood Areal Extent product near the confluence of the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers [click to enlarge]

Landsat-8 False Color RGB image + GOES-16 River Flood Areal Extent product near the confluence of the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers [click to enlarge]

A comparison of a Landsat-8 False Color Red-Green-Blue (RGB) image and the GOES-16 River Flood Areal Extent product near the confluence of the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers as viewed using RealEarth (above) showed areas of river flooding in the Cape Girardeau, Missouri and Cairo, Illinois areas on 01 June 2019.

The River Flood Areal Extent product — derived using GOES-16 data — as depicted in AWIPS is shown below.

GOES-16 River Flood Areal Extent product [click to enlarge]

GOES-16 River Flood Areal Extent product [click to enlarge]

Farther to the northwest, a similar comparison of a Landsat-8 False Color RGB image and the GOES-16 River Flood Areal Extent product near the confluence of the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers (below) revealed river flooding near St. Louis, Missouri.

Landsat-8 False Color RGB images + GOES-16 River Flood Areal Extent product near the confluence of the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers [click to enlarge]

Landsat-8 False Color RGB image + GOES-16 River Flood Areal Extent product near the confluence of the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers [click to enlarge]

The GOES-16 River Flood Areal Extent product over this area as depicted in AWIPS is shown below.

GOES-16 River Flood Areal Extent product [click to enlarge]

GOES-16 River Flood Areal Extent product [click to enlarge]



Maps of 7, 14 and 30-day precipitation (below) depicted heavy rainfall focused across southern Iowa, northern Missouri and northwestern Illinois — it was this heavy rain that exacerbated the ongoing river flooding problems in parts of the central US.

7-day, 14-day and 30-day precipitation ending at 12 UTC on 01 June 2019 [click to enlarge]

7-day, 14-day and 30-day precipitation ending at 12 UTC on 01 June 2019 [click to enlarge]

Much of the 30-day precipitation north (upstream) of the flooding areas shown above was 4-8 inches above normal, or 200-300% of normal (below).

30-day precipitation, departure and percent of normal ending at 12 UTC on 01 June 2019 [click to enlarge]

30-day precipitation, departure and percent of normal ending at 12 UTC on 01 June 2019 [click to enlarge]

View only this post Read Less

When Atmospheric Bores cause Severe Weather

Strong near-surface inversions over the upper-midwest early on 1 June 2019 (as shown by 1200 UTC Skew-Ts at Green Bay, WI, Detroit/WhiteLake, MI and Gaylord, MI) helped support the presence of southward-propagating bore features, as shown in the still image (an animation) of radar imagery above (Courtesy Fred Best, SSEC), and (more subtly) in... Read More

RadarScope imagery from shortly after 0900 UTC on 01 June 2019 (Click to play .mov animation)

Strong near-surface inversions over the upper-midwest early on 1 June 2019 (as shown by 1200 UTC Skew-Ts at Green Bay, WI, Detroit/WhiteLake, MI and Gaylord, MI) helped support the presence of southward-propagating bore features, as shown in the still image (an animation) of radar imagery above (Courtesy Fred Best, SSEC), and (more subtly) in the water vapor imagery (Courtesy Scott Bachmeier) below.

The pressure sensor at the top of the Atmospheric Oceanic and Space Science Building showed many small time-scale pressure perturbations on this day. (Image courtesy Pete Pokrandt)

Water Vapor Imagery from to on 1 June 2019; Low-level (GOES-16 ABI Band 10, 7.34 µm) on the left ; mid-level (GOES-16 ABI Band 9, 6.95 µm) in the center; upper-level (GOES-16 ABI Band 8, 6.19 µm) on the right


Later in the day, strong convection developed over southwestern Lower Michigan, starting shortly after 2215 UTC.  The visible imagery below shows 1-minute imagery (GOES-16 ABI Band 2, 0.64 µm) from a Mesoscale sector positioned over the convection.  At the start, the parallel lines of low clouds suggest a bore feature is propagating southward towards strong convection over northern Indiana and northern Ohio.  Two things happen when that feature meets the convective outflow: some energy is apparently reflected to the north, but very strong convection rapidly develops near Battle Creek MI, where 2″ hail was observed at 2235 UTC (SPC Storm Reports).

GOES-16 ABI 1-minute Visible (0.64 µm) imagery, 2115-2149 UTC on 1 June 2019 (Click to play animated gif)

The clean window (GOES 16 ABI Band 13, 10.3 µm) animation during the day, below, show many features suggesting bore/gravity wave propagation over the area. It is challenging to pick out the impulse from this animation that lead to the severe convection that hit Battle Creek.

GOES-16 ABI Infrared (10.3 µm, Band 13 “Clean Window”) imagery, 1001-2331 UTC on 1 June 2019 (Click to play animated gif)

The Low-Level water vapor animation, shown below, also shows many features that resemble gravity waves or bores, but it also shows a line of parallel features moving towards the site of convective initiation (Consider this short loop from 2126 to 2156 UTC, for example).

GOES-16 ABI Water Vapor (7.3 µm, Band 10 “Low-Level Water Vapor”) infrared imagery, 1001-2331 UTC on 1 June 2019 (Click to play animated gif)

For convection to initiate, instability should be present. The graphic below from the Storm Prediction Center mesoanalysis website shows a nose of unstable air (represented by high values of CAPE) encroaching into southwestern Lower Michigan.

SPC CAPE analysis, 2100 UTC on 1 June 2019 (Click to enlarge)

GOES-16 Baseline Products can also diagnose instability. On 1 June 2019, however, abundant cloudiness limited the utility of the Baseline clear-sky only products, but AllSky versions have been developed and are available online at this website. The animation below shows the evolution of the AllSky Lifted Index from 1826 through 2356 UTC on 1 June 2019. In agreement with the SPC analysis, the AllSky product shows a nose of instability pushing into southwestern lower Michigan. An southward-propagating impulse (apparent in both visible and low-level water vapor imagery) meeting this gradient in instability did initiate convection on this day.

GOES-16 AllSky Lifted Index, half-hourly from 1826 UTC to 2356 UTC on 1 June 2019 (Click to play animated gif)

NOAA/CIMSS ProbSevere (v.2), a tool designed to give confidence that severe weather might occur in the next 60 minutes, shown below, tracked the rapid evolution of the storm. ProbHail increased from 7% at 2220 UTC to 81% at 2230 UTC!

NOAA/CIMSS ProbSevere, with readout values, from 2200 to 2236 UTC on 1 June 2019 (Click to play animated gif)

The chart below, from John Cintineo, SSEC/CIMSS, graphically shows the very rapid development of Prob Hail values. Much of the increase in ProbHail was driven by MESH and Total Lightning observations. When an impulse enters a region of instability in a good environment, explosive growth can result.

NOAA/CIMSS ProbSevere readout for Radar Object 411723 (the storm that produced Hail in Battle Creek MI on 1 June 2019) (Click to enlarge)

Many thanks to TJ Turnage, NWS Grand Rapids, for alerting us to this very interesting case.

View only this post Read Less

Canadian wildfire smoke over the Upper Midwest

GOES-16 (GOES-East) True Color Red-Green-Blue (RGB) images from the AOS site (above) revealed the arrival of a dense high-altitude smoke plume from the north, which cast a late-day shadow onto the top of a more aged layer of lower-altitude smoke over the Upper Midwest on 30 May 2019. These smoke layers were... Read More

GOES-16 True Color RGB images [click to play animation | MP4]

GOES-16 True Color RGB images [click to play animation | MP4]

GOES-16 (GOES-East) True Color Red-Green-Blue (RGB) images from the AOS site (above) revealed the arrival of a dense high-altitude smoke plume from the north, which cast a late-day shadow onto the top of a more aged layer of lower-altitude smoke over the Upper Midwest on 30 May 2019. These smoke layers were being transported from large wildfires that were burning across northern Alberta.

Images from the west-facing AOSS rooftop camera (below) showed the slow obscuration of the setting sun as the smoke layers aloft became increasingly thick.

Images from the west-facing AOSS rooftop camera [click to play animation | MP4]

Images from the west-facing AOSS rooftop camera [click to play animation | MP4]

The GOES-16 Smoke Detection product (below) flagged most of the lower-altitude smoke with its “High Confidence” category.

GOES-16

GOES-16 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) and Smoke Detection product [click to play animation | MP4]

The higher-altitude smoke plume that moved southward contained some cirrus debris from the pyrocumulonimbus cloud that formed at the wildfire source in northern Alberta, so it was not classified as smoke by the Smoke Detection product — the plume itself did exhibit 10.3 µm infrared brightness temperatures as cold as -57ºC as it approached the Canada/US border (below).

GOES-16 "Clean" Infrared Window (10.3 µm) images [click to play animation | MP4]

GOES-16 “Clean” Infrared Window (10.3 µm) images [click to play animation | MP4]

Some of the lower-altitude smoke exhibited GOES-16 Aerosol Optical Depth values as high as 1.0 to 2.0 (below).

GOES-16 Aerosol Optical Depth product [click to play animation | MP4]

GOES-16 Aerosol Optical Depth product [click to play animation | MP4]

View only this post Read Less

Actinoform clouds (or actinae) in the central Pacific Ocean

GOES-17 (GOES-West) “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) images (above) revealed the mesoscale cyclonic circulations of actinoform clouds (or “actinae“) within the marine boundary layer stratocumulus cloud field over the central Pacific Ocean on 30 May 2019.This type of cloud feature was originally identified in TIROS-V imagery over the Pacific Ocean in 1962 (below),... Read More

GOES-17 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) images, with 3-hourly plots of ship wind reports [click to play animation | MP4]

GOES-17 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) images, with 3-hourly plots of ship wind reports [click to play animation | MP4]

GOES-17 (GOES-West) “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) images (above) revealed the mesoscale cyclonic circulations of actinoform clouds (or “actinae“) within the marine boundary layer stratocumulus cloud field over the central Pacific Ocean on 30 May 2019.

This type of cloud feature was originally identified in TIROS-V imagery over the Pacific Ocean in 1962 (below), and was featured in the first Monthly Weather Review “Picture of the Month” series in January 1963.

TIROS-V image of actinoform clouds over the western Pacific Ocean on 07 October 1962 [click to enlarge]

TIROS-V image of actinoform clouds over the western Pacific Ocean on 07 October 1962 [click to enlarge]

View only this post Read Less