This website works best with a newer web browser such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Microsoft Edge. Internet Explorer is not supported by this website.

Trail Mountain Fire in Utah

GOES-16 (GOES-East) “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) and Shortwave Infrared (3.9 µm) images (above) showed the smoke plume and thermal anomaly or “hot spot” (dark black to red pixels) associated with the Trail Mountain Fire in Utah on 20 June 2018. Once the smoke was lofted to higher altitudes (in 2 distinct pulses) it quickly fanned out... Read More

GOES-16

GOES-16 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm, left) and Shortwave Infrared (3.9 µm, right) images, with hourly plots of surface reports [click to play MP4 animation]

GOES-16 (GOES-East) “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) and Shortwave Infrared (3.9 µm) images (above) showed the smoke plume and thermal anomaly or “hot spot” (dark black to red pixels) associated with the Trail Mountain Fire in Utah on 20 June 2018. Once the smoke was lofted to higher altitudes (in 2 distinct pulses) it quickly fanned out southeastward toward the Utah/Colorado border, transported by northwesterly winds around the periphery of a ridge of high pressure that was building into the Southwest US.

View only this post Read Less

Fixed-Grid Format Data flowing in AWIPS

Until today, GOES-16 Data that flowed into AWIPS was remapped twice: First, from the observational perspective (that is, how the satellite views it) to a spherical fixed-grid projection that approximates the Earth, and then to a Lambert Conformal projection with (for infrared data) 2-km resolution over the Globe. That Lambert... Read More

AWIPS imagery of GOES-16 Low-Level Water Vapor (7.34 µm) at 1527 and 1532 UTC on 19 June (Click to enlarge)

Until today, GOES-16 Data that flowed into AWIPS was remapped twice: First, from the observational perspective (that is, how the satellite views it) to a spherical fixed-grid projection that approximates the Earth, and then to a Lambert Conformal projection with (for infrared data) 2-km resolution over the Globe. That Lambert Conformal data was then shipped to AWIPS, where the data were again re-projected into the observational perspective desired by the meteorologist.

The 2-km resolution of the data shipped to AWIPS before today is applicable only at the sub-satellite point (nadir) for GOES-16. Thus, the second remap was suggesting better resolution than was warranted by the data. Additionally, the number of data points needed to be sent was very big.

At 1532 UTC on 19 June, the first fixed-grid format data were directly shipped to AWIPS; remapping to a Lambert Conformal projection is no longer done upstream of AWIPS. The toggle above shows the difference in the 7.34 µm “Low-Level” Infrared Water Vapor imagery over the coast of Oregon, near 46º N, 124º W (very far from the GOES-16 sub-satellite point at 0º N, 75.2º W), in the AWIPS CONUS projection.  At 1532 UTC, after the double remap is removed, the pixels are more distinct, and as expected they splay away from the sub-satellite point.

Removing a remapping in the data processing means that pixel-sized extremes — such as overshooting tops, or fires — and gradients will be better represented in the data.  Consider the Clean Window (10.3 µm) Infrared imagery below of strong convection over the Gulf of Mexico east of Texas.  Overshooting tops Brightness Temperatures are colder and the tops themselves more distinct after 1532 UTC than at 1527 UTC.

AWIPS imagery of GOES-16 Clean Window Infrared Data (10.3 µm) from 1347 to 1612 UTC on 19 June. The animation pauses on the last double-remapped image at 1527 UTC, and the first fixed-grid format image at 1532 UTC (Click to enlarge)

 

See also this blog postThis training also discusses the remapping.  And here (or here) is the National Weather Service announcement on the change.

View only this post Read Less

Large hail in north central Colorado

Severe thunderstorms developed  over the Front Range of Colorado during the late afternoon and early evening of 18 June 2018. One of the GOES-16 (GOES-East) Mesoscale Domain Sectors positioned over that region provided 1-minute data — shown above is a comparison of “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) and “Clean” Infrared Window (10.3 µm) images of these storms... Read More

GOES-16

GOES-16 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm, left) and “Clean” Infrared Window (10.3 µm, right) images, with plots of SPC storm reports [click to play MP4 animation]

Severe thunderstorms developed  over the Front Range of Colorado during the late afternoon and early evening of 18 June 2018. One of the GOES-16 (GOES-East) Mesoscale Domain Sectors positioned over that region provided 1-minute data — shown above is a comparison of “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) and “Clean” Infrared Window (10.3 µm) images of these storms as they produced large hail (up to 3 inches in diameter) across parts of the Front Range Urban Corridor. SPC storm reports are plotted on the images.

View only this post Read Less

High cloud shadow over eastern Iowa

@CIMSS_Satellite: Any idea what the relatively small, darker area/depression was going over Grundy County (west of Waterloo) from 1232z to 1342z? Most prevalent at 1312z. Shows up in all GOES bands. Channel 7 also shows a corresponding darker area just north of that area. — Andrew Ansorge (@ajsorge) June 18, 2018... Read More

It’s always good to get a question that lends itself well to the “What the heck is this?” blog category. The answer, as is often the case, relies on an examination of imagery from a variety of GOES-16 ABI bands.  To begin, note the darker feature seen on 1-minute Mesoscale Domain Sector GOES-16 “Blue” Visible (0.47 µm), “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) and Near-Infrared “Vegetation” (0.86 µm) images (below), which was moving northeastward across eastern Iowa and passing just to the west of Waterloo (KALO) on the morning of 18 June 2018.

GOES-16 "Blue" Visible (0.47 µm), "Red" Visible (0.64 µm) and Near-Infrared "Snow/Ice" (1.61 µm) images

GOES-16 “Blue” Visible (0.47 µm, left), “Red” Visible (0.64 µm, center) and Near-Infrared “Vegetation” (0.86 µm, right) images [click to play animation | MP4]

To explore the initial hypothesis that this might be a shadow from a higher-altitude cloud feature, GOES-16 Near-Infrared “Cirrus” (1.37 µm), Mid-level Water Vapor (6.9 µm) and Upper-level Water Vapor (6.2 µm) images were examined (below), which did indeed reveal a small cloud element aloft that was drifting in the same direction as the darker feature seen above.

GOES-16 Near-Infrared

GOES-16 Near-Infrared “Cirrus” (1.37 µm, left), Mid-level Water Vapor (6.9 µm, center) and Upper-level Water Vapor (6.2 µm, right) images [click to play animation | MP4]

Finally, a comparison of GOES-16 Near-Infrared “Cirrus” (1.37 µm), Shortwave Infrared (3.9 µm) and “Clean” Infrared Window (10.3 µm) images (below) showed that this small (and likely thin) high-altitude cloud exhibited no signature in the Shortwave Infrared, but did exhibit a 10.3 µm brightness temperature as cold as -20ºC (cyan enhancement) at times.

GOES-16 Near-Infrared

GOES-16 Near-Infrared “Cirrus” (1.37 µm, left), Shortwave Infrared (3.9 µm, center) and “Clean” Infrared Window (10.3 µm, right) images [click to play animation | MP4]

12 UTC rawinsonde data from Davenport, Iowa (below) showed southwesterly winds and an air temperature just below -20ºC at an altitude of around 9.6 km.

12 UTC rawinsonde data from Davenport, Iowa [click to enlarge]

12 UTC rawinsonde data from Davenport, Iowa [click to enlarge]

Thanks to Andrew Ansorge (NWS DMX) and Rich Mamrosh (NWS GRB) for alerting us to this interesting feature!

View only this post Read Less