This website works best with a newer web browser such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Microsoft Edge. Internet Explorer is not supported by this website.

Tropical Storm Epsilon in the Atlantic

1-minute Mesoscale Domain Sector GOES-16 (GOES-East) “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) and “Clean” Infrared Window (10.35 µm) images (above) showed Tropical Depression 27 as further intensified to become Tropical Storm Epsilon at 15 UTC on 19 October 2020. While the low-level circulation (LLC) generally remained exposed during that time, deep convection was increasing around the LLC (including a small convective burst near the... Read More

GOES-16 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) and “Clean” Infrared Window (10.35 µm) images [click to play animation | MP4]

GOES-16 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) and “Clean” Infrared Window (10.35 µm) images [click to play animation | MP4]

1-minute Mesoscale Domain Sector GOES-16 (GOES-East) “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) and “Clean” Infrared Window (10.35 µm) images (above) showed Tropical Depression 27 as further intensified to become Tropical Storm Epsilon at 15 UTC on 19 October 2020. While the low-level circulation (LLC) generally remained exposed during that time, deep convection was increasing around the LLC (including a small convective burst near the storm center forming around 1630 UTC).

GOES-16 Visible image with plots of available NUCAPS profiles [click to enlarge]

GOES-16 Visible image with plots of available NUCAPS profiles [click to enlarge]

A GOES-16 Visible image with plots of available NOAA-20 NUCAPS profiles (above) showed one valid infrared (CrIS) + microwave (ATMS) sounding (green dot) just southeast of the center of Epsilon at 1640 UTC — that sounding profile (below) revealed a moist (PW = 1.95″) and unstable (MU CAPE = 1066 J/kg, and LI = -3) atmosphere just after the time of development of the convective burst near Epsilon’s center.

NUCAPS profile just southeast of the center of Tropical Storm Epsilon [click to enlarge]

NUCAPS profile just southeast of the center of Tropical Storm Epsilon [click to enlarge]

GOES-16 Visible images with overlays of deep-layer wind shear and GLM Flashes from the CIMSS Tropical Cyclones site (below) indicated that Epsilon was in an environment of moderate shear, with limited lighting activity near the storm center.

GOES-16 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) images, with overlays of deep-layer wind shear and GLM Flashes [click to enlarge]

GOES-16 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) images, with overlays of deep-layer wind shear and GLM Flashes [click to enlarge]

A toggle between the MIMIC Total Precipitable Water and Saharan Air Layer products (below) showed that Epsilon was embedded within a pocket of abundant moisture, with dry air situated to the north and northwest.

MIMIC Total Precipitable Water and Saharan Air Layer product [click to enlarge]

MIMIC Total Precipitable Water and Saharan Air Layer product [click to enlarge]

Tropical Storm Epsilon was located over water having Sea Surface Temperature values around 28ºC and a modest Ocean Heat Content (below).

Sea Surface Temperature and Ocean Heat Content [click to enlarge]

Sea Surface Temperature and Ocean Heat Content [click to enlarge]



View only this post Read Less

NOAA-20 sounder observations of the atmosphere during a downslope event

Low-level water vapor imagery, above, from early morning on 17 October 2020, shows the characteristics of strong low-level winds in the lee of the Colorado Rockies, namely a warm trench and herringbone-like structures that suggest turbulent flow. This region is near the Cameron Peak fire, a long-lived conflagration to the west of... Read More

GOES-16 Band 10 (7.3 µm) “Low-level water vapor” infrared imagery, 0831 – 1316 UTC (Click to animate)

Low-level water vapor imagery, above, from early morning on 17 October 2020, shows the characteristics of strong low-level winds in the lee of the Colorado Rockies, namely a warm trench and herringbone-like structures that suggest turbulent flow. This region is near the Cameron Peak fire, a long-lived conflagration to the west of Fort Collins (previous blog posts on this event are here, here and here).

Shortwave infrared imagery, below, captures the regions of hottest fire activity, both with Cameron Peak and with the newer East Troublesome fire to its southwest. Clouds moving down from the north impede the satellite view of the fires at the end of the animation.

GOES-16 Band 7 (3.9 µm) shortwave infrared imagery, 0921 – 1241 UTC, with surface observation plots (Click to animate)


NOAA-20 overflies Colorado twice daily; do the NUCAPS soundings produced from radiances observed by the CrIS (Cross-track Infrared Sounder) and ATMS (Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder) instruments on board NOAA-20 detect atmospheric structures (i.e., inversions) that trap energy and accompany downslope wind events?  On 16 October, in the afternoon, NOAA-20 NUCAPS soundings, below, did not show inversions.

NOAA-20 NUCAPS Profiles at the locations indicated, at ~1900 UTC on 16 October 2020 (click to enlarge)

Similarly, NUCAPS profiles from the morning pass on 17 October, however, around 0900 UTC,  did not show mid-tropospheric inversions over eastern Colorado, over the High Plains.

NOAA-20 NUCAPS Profiles at the locations indicated, at ~0900 UTC on 17 October 2020 (click to enlarge)

Some NUCAPS profiles upstream of the Front Range of the Rockies, however, showed ample evidence of inversions, especially in a region over central Colorado.

NOAA-20 NUCAPS Profiles at the locations indicated, at ~0900 UTC on 17 October 2020 (click to enlarge)

The 7.3 µm infrared image (Band 10, low-level water vapor), below, has turbulent structure near the regions where inversions were detected by NUCAPS.

GOES-16 ABI Band 10 (7.3 µm) at 0931 UTC, 17 October 2020. The blue-circled region roughly corresponds to the region where NUCAPS profiles show a mid-tropospheric inversion consistent with downslope winds to the east (Click to enlarge)

A wind speed plot from the NCAR Mesa Lab in Boulder, below (source), shows the periodic strong and gusty winds on 17 October.

Wind speeds and gusts for the 24 hours ending 11:52 MDT (1652 UTC) on 17 October 2020 (Click to enlarge)

Use NUCAPS profiles to gauge the strength of the inversion that is associated with downslope events.

Thanks to Paul Schlatter, SOO at WFO BOU, for the idea for this blog post!

View only this post Read Less

Early-season snowfall across the northern Plains

GOES-16 (GOES-East) “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) and Day Cloud Phase Distinction Red-Green-Blue (RGB) images (above) showed multiple long, narrow northwest-to-southeast oriented swaths of snow cover extending across much of North Dakota into western Minnesota early in the day on 16 October 2020. The snow swaths — which appeared as brighter shades of green in the RGB... Read More

GOES-16

GOES-16 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) and Day Cloud Phase Distinction RGB images [click to play animation | MP4]

GOES-16 (GOES-East) “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) and Day Cloud Phase Distinction Red-Green-Blue (RGB) images (above) showed multiple long, narrow northwest-to-southeast oriented swaths of snow cover extending across much of North Dakota into western Minnesota early in the day on 16 October 2020. The snow swaths — which appeared as brighter shades of green in the RGB images — slowly melted during the late morning and early afternoon hours.

A toggle between NOAA-20 VIIRS Sea Surface Temperature (SST) product and Infrared Window (11.45 µm) images at 0843 UTC (below) displayed a northwest-to-southeast cloud band that extended from Lake Sakakawea (which exhibited SST values in the low/mid 50s F) to the Bismarck (KBIS) / Mandan area. Note that Mandan (located just west of KBIS) was reporting “precipitation of unknown type” with an air temperature of 32ºF — indicating that this feature was a lake effect cloud band which was producing light precipitation (predominantly snow).

NOAA-20 Sea Surface Temperature product and Infrared Window (11.45 µm) images at 0843 UTC [click to enlarge]

NOAA-20 VIIRS Sea Surface Temperature product and Infrared Window (11.45 µm) images at 0843 UTC [click to enlarge]


=====17 October Update =====

GOES-16 Day Cloud Phase Distinction RGB images [click to play animation | MP4]

GOES-16 Day Cloud Phase Distinction RGB images [click to play animation | MP4]

On the following day, GOES-16 Day Cloud Phase Distinction RGB images (above) showed a new, broader swath of snow cover from southern Saskatchewan and northeastern Montana into North Dakota that was produced by a clipper-type disturbance (surface analyses). For this event, snowfall amounts were as high as 3.5 inches in northeastern Montana and 2.1 inches in North Dakota (NOHRSC) — so the rate of snow melt was slower than what was seen on the previous day.

View only this post Read Less

GOES-17 IFR Probability fields are now being created for Alaska

CIMSS is now producing IFR Probability fields (and Low IFR Probability, Marginal VFR Probability, and Cloud Thickness fields) using GOES-17 data.  (Recall that GOES-16 IFR Probability fields  are now produced by NOAA/NESDIS and are distributed via the Satellite Broadcast Network (SBN) to National Weather Service Forecast Offices.  GOES-16, however, does... Read More

GOES-17 IFR Probability fields over Anchorage AK and surroundings, 0200 – 1300 UTC on 15 October 2020 (Click to animate)

CIMSS is now producing IFR Probability fields (and Low IFR Probability, Marginal VFR Probability, and Cloud Thickness fields) using GOES-17 data.  (Recall that GOES-16 IFR Probability fields  are now produced by NOAA/NESDIS and are distributed via the Satellite Broadcast Network (SBN) to National Weather Service Forecast Offices.  GOES-16, however, does not view Alaska).  GOES-17 fields will presently be available via an LDM pull.  NOAA/NESDIS will likely start processing the fields in 2021.

The animation above shows IFR Probability fields today over the Anchorage region.  The animation is preceded by a view of the topographic features, and IFR conditions on 15 October seem centered on topographic features.

GOES-17 can view the North Slope of Alaska.  This location is quite far from the GOES-17 sub-satellite point, so resolution is degraded from the nadir 2-km views. However, regions of likely IFR conditions are easily tracked (Again, the animation is preceded by topography), with a large region between the Arctic Ocean and the high terrain of the Brooks Range.

GOES-17 IFR Probability fields over northern Alaska, 0200 -1300 UTC, 15 October 2020 (Click to animate)

 

GOES-17 views of Alaska southeast, below show probabilities of low clouds and reduced visibility. As over other regions of Alaska today, highest probabilities are over high terrain. GOES-17 IFR Probability for the PACUS domain is available at this website. Work is ongoing to insert IFR Probability (from GOES-16 and GOES-17) into Real Earth.

GOES-17 IFR Probability fields over Alaska Southeast, 0200 -1400 UTC, 15 October 2020 (Click to animate)

GOES-17 fields contain artifacts in the form of horizontal stripes that can be traced to the poorly-functioning Loop Heat Pipe on GOES-17.  GOES-17 is now in a reduced-scanning mode between 0600 and 1200 UTC to enhance the ability of the satellite to shed excess heat:  fewer Mesoscale sectors are scanned, full disk sectors are not as frequent (every 15 minutes instead of every 10), and the ‘PACUS’ sector is not scanned.  This scanning strategy will continue through the end of October.


The Forecast Decision Training Division has a Quick Guide on IFR Probability fields here.  A 20-minute YouTube video explaining the product is here.

View only this post Read Less