This website works best with a newer web browser such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Microsoft Edge. Internet Explorer is not supported by this website.

Sensing the surface in GOES-16 Water Vapor imagery

GOES-16 (GOES-East) Low-level (7.3 µm) and Mid-level (6.9 µm) Water Vapor images (above) showed that portions of the coastline of Lake Superior, Lake Michigan and Lake Huron were apparent during the day on 10 January 2022. When a very cold/dry arctic air mass is present over a particular area, the water vapor “weighting functions”... Read More

GOES-16 Low-level (7.3 µm) and Mid-level (6.9 µm) Water Vapor images, with and without map overlays [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

GOES-16 (GOES-East) Low-level (7.3 µm) and Mid-level (6.9 µm) Water Vapor images (above) showed that portions of the coastline of Lake Superior, Lake Michigan and Lake Huron were apparent during the day on 10 January 2022. When a very cold/dry arctic air mass is present over a particular area, the water vapor “weighting functions” are shifted to lower altitudes — which in this case allowed the strong thermal contrast between (1) the cold, snow-covered land surface across Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan and Ontario and (2) the warmer ice-free nearshore waters of the Great Lakes to be sensed by GOES Water Vapor spectral bands. The coldest surface air temperatures that morning across the region included -34ºF at Badoura MN, -27ºF at Grantsburg WI and -15ºF at Ironwood MI.

Plots of GOES-16 Low-level (7.3 µm) and Mid-level (6.9 µm) Water Vapor weighting functions (below) — calculated using 12 UTC rawinsonde data from Green Bay, Wisconsin (KGRB) — showed peak radiation contributions for the 7.3 µm and 6.9 µm spectral bands were at the 853 hPa and 730 hPa pressure levels, respectively, with some contribution coming directly from the surface. This example underscores the fact that “water vapor” spectral bands are essentially infrared bands — and with very little water vapor within the atmospheric column to absorb then re-radiate any upwelling energy (at its colder ambient temperature aloft), the signature of this land vs. water thermal contrast was able to reach the satellite sensors with minimal attenuation. 

Plots of GOES-16 Low-level (7.3 µm) and Mid-level (6.9 µm) Water Vapor weighting functions at Green Bay WI [click to enlarge]

According to the Green Bay WI rawinsonde Total Precipitable Water (TPW) climatology (source), the TPW value of 0.04 inch at 12 UTC on 10 January was very close to the record low value (0.03 inch) for that date/time (below).

Green Bay WI rawinsonde Total Precipitable Water climatology [click to enlarge]

Other examples of GOES water vapor imagery sensing the surface in a cold/dry air mass: Feb 2020 | Jan 2019 | Dec 2019.

View only this post Read Less

SAR data for winds and ice over the Great Lakes

Data from this site shows SAR observations over the Great Lakes daily around 0000 and 1200 UTC. The image above shows SAR data over Lake Superior just before 1200 UTC on 10 January. The background flow used in processing shows strong northwesterly winds. Note the relative calm in the lee of... Read More

Radarsat Constellation Mission (RCM) observations over Lake Superior, 11:59 UTC on 10 January 2022 (Click to enlarge)

Data from this site shows SAR observations over the Great Lakes daily around 0000 and 1200 UTC. The image above shows SAR data over Lake Superior just before 1200 UTC on 10 January. The background flow used in processing shows strong northwesterly winds. Note the relative calm in the lee of the Keewenah peninsula, and an interesting boundary in the winds near Michipicoten Island. As noted in this blog post from December, the strongest winds are likely associated with enhanced Lake-Effect bands, as enhanced vertical mixing in those bands will allow stronger upper level winds to mix down to the lake surface.

Does ABI imagery show enhancements in the regions where the SAR data indicates enhanced mixing with convective bands? Consider the 3.9 µm image below (from this NOAA/STAR website) from 1201 UTC. Cold cloud tops northeast of Marquette MI do correlate well with the strong winds in that regions.

GOES-16 Band 7 (3.9 µm) at 1201 UTC on 10 January 2022 (click to enlarge)

Scatterometry can also be used to measure winds on the lake surface. The imagery below (from this website) shows vectors from the Chinese HY-2B scatterometer at 1330 UTC. Spatial resolution for this imagery is much coarser, and observations closer to shore do not occur. Northwest winds of at least 30 knots are indicated however.

HY-2B scatterometry at 1310 UTC, 10 January 2022 (Click to enlarge)

A careful observer of the SAR winds above might notice very strong winds in/around Little Bay de Noc, the northeastern part of Green Bay. Care must be taken to differentiate between ice and winds in regions where ice is present, as SAR data can be also used to identify regions of ice. The toggle below of NOAA-20 True and False color imagery over the western Great Lakes (from the VIIRS today website) does show cyan regions — typical of ice — over northeastern Green Bay. (Click here for highest resolution False Color imagery from NOAA-20 on 9 January)

NOAA-20 True and False color over the Great Lakes, 9 January 2022 (Click to enlarge)

What kind of wave heights are these strong northwesterly winds generating over Lake Superior? Altimetric data from SMAP, below, (source) shows 6-8 foot waves over western Lake Superior. The longer fetch for the region northeast of Marquette probably means much higher waves there.

Wave Heights (feet) at ~0315 UTC on 10 January 2022 (click to enlarge)

View only this post Read Less

Typhoon Tiffany makes landfall in Australia

JMA Himawari-8 Visible (0.64 µm) images (above) showed Tropical Cyclone Tiffany as it made landfall along the eastern coast of the Cape York Peninsula in Queensland, Australia on 09 January 2022. [UPDATE: just prior to making landfall around 0130 UTC on 10 January, Tiffany intensified to a Category 1 typhoon... Read More

JMA Himawari-8 Visible (0.64 µm) images [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

JMA Himawari-8 Visible (0.64 µm) images (above) showed Tropical Cyclone Tiffany as it made landfall along the eastern coast of the Cape York Peninsula in Queensland, Australia on 09 January 2022. [UPDATE: just prior to making landfall around 0130 UTC on 10 January, Tiffany intensified to a Category 1 typhoon (JTWC discussion)].

A longer animation of Himawari-8 Infrared (10.4 µm) images (below) revealed pulses of overshooting tops which exhibited cloud-top infrared brightness temperatures in the -90 to -95°C range.

JMA Himawari-8 Infrared (10.4 µm) images [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

A stepped sequence of zoomed-in Suomi-NPP VIIRS Infrared (11.45 µm) images at 1517 UTC, viewed using RealEarth (below) showed a few red pixels — which highlighted cloud-top infrared brightness temperatures of -100°C or colder.   

Suomi-NPP VIIRS Infrared (11.45 µm) image at 1517 UTC [click to enlarge]

DMSP-16 SSMIS Microwave (85 GHz) imagery from the CIMSS Tropical Cyclones site (below) showed convection wrapping around a very small eye feature at 1905 UTC.

DMSP-16 SSMIS Microwave (85 GHz) image [click to enlarge]

Himawari-8 Infrared images with contours of deep-layer wind shear (below) indicated that Tiffany was moving through an environment of light to moderate shear. 

JMA Himawari-8 Infrared images, with contours of deep-layer wind shear [click to enlarge]

View only this post Read Less

Eruption of Volcán Wolf in the Galápagos Islands

GOES-16 Ash RGB images created using Geo2Grid (above) displayed the expansion of 2 volcanic clouds following the eruption of Wolf in the Galápagos Islands on 07 January 2022 — one moving northeastward and dissipating, and the other moving westward. The green shades of the volcanic cloud suggested that it contained fairly... Read More

GOES-16 Ash RGB images [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

GOES-16 Ash RGB images created using Geo2Grid (above) displayed the expansion of 2 volcanic clouds following the eruption of Wolf in the Galápagos Islands on 07 January 2022 — one moving northeastward and dissipating, and the other moving westward. The green shades of the volcanic cloud suggested that it contained fairly high concentrations of SO2 (in contrast to volcanic ash, would would appear as shades of pink/magenta). The cluster of dark blue pixels represented the hot thermal anomaly at the summit of the volcano, which persisted during the entire day.

This persistent thermal anomaly was also apparent in Shortwave Infrared (3.9 µm) images from GOES-17 (GOES-West) and GOES-16 (GOES-East) (below), shown in the native projection of each satellite.

Shortwave Infrared (3.9 µm) images from GOES-17 (left) and GOES-16 (right) [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

View only this post Read Less