This website works best with a newer web browser such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Microsoft Edge. Internet Explorer is not supported by this website.

GOES-11 vs GOES-13 water vapor channel images

A comparison of GOES-11 6.7µm and GOES-13 6.5µm “water vapor channel” images from 23 September 2008 (above) highlights two important changes to the GOES-13 satellite: the spatial resolution of the GOES-13 water vapor channel imagery has been improved to 4km (compared to... Read More

GOES-11 and GOES-13 water vapor channel images

GOES-11 and GOES-13 water vapor images

A comparison of GOES-11 6.7µm and GOES-13 6.5µm “water vapor channel” images from 23 September 2008 (above) highlights two important changes to the GOES-13 satellite:

  1. the spatial resolution of the GOES-13 water vapor channel imagery has been improved to 4km (compared to 8km on GOES-11), which allows for more accurate detection of mesoscale “mountain waves” (or “lee waves”) that had formed over Wyoming and adjacent portions of Colorado and Montana
  2. larger batteries on board GOES-13 allow the satellite to continue to operate through Spring and Fall season “eclipse periods”, when the satellite is in the Earth’s shadow (and the solar panels cannot generate the necessary power for the instruments). The blank GOES-11 images seen in the animation above indicate outages during the GOES-11 eclipse period

View only this post Read Less

The last day of Summer…

What do you do on the last day of meteorological summer if you’re in southeastern Nunavut or far northern Manitoba in Canada? You watch fresh snow cover melt! AWIPS images of the MODIS visible channel,  snow/ice channel, and Land Surface Temperature product on Read More

AWIPS images of MODIS visible, snow/ice, and Land Suface Temperature

AWIPS images of MODIS visible, snow/ice, and Land Suface Temperature

What do you do on the last day of meteorological summer if you’re in southeastern Nunavut or far northern Manitoba in Canada? You watch fresh snow cover melt! AWIPS images of the MODIS visible channel,  snow/ice channel, and Land Surface Temperature product on 21 September 2008 (above) showed that significant snow cover was in place across that region (which had fallen a few days earlier). The many lakes in that area were still not frozen, and appeared very dark against the surrounding snow cover on the visible image. The slightly darker signal on the near-IR snow/ice image confirmed the presence of snow cover; Land Surface Temperature values were at or just below freezing at many locations (darker green colors), where presumably there was somewhat more snow cover.

The snow cover analysis from Environment Canada (below) indicated that as much as 12 cm (5 inches) of snow was on the ground in that region.

Snow cover chart

Snow cover analysis

View only this post Read Less

River valley fog over Missouri and Arkansas

AWIPS images of the 4-km resolution GOES-12 fog/stratus and Low Cloud Base products and the 1-km resolution MODIS fog/stratus product (above) showed fingers of river valley fog that had formed over parts of southern Missouri and northern Arkansas at around 08 UTC (3am local time) on Read More

 GOES-12 fog/stratus and low cloud base products + MODIS fog/stratus product

GOES-12 fog/stratus and low cloud base products + MODIS fog/stratus product

AWIPS images of the 4-km resolution GOES-12 fog/stratus and Low Cloud Base products and the 1-km resolution MODIS fog/stratus product (above) showed fingers of river valley fog that had formed over parts of southern Missouri and northern Arkansas at around 08 UTC (3am local time) on 17 September 2008. The soil was moist across that particular region due to heavy rainfall associated with the passage of the remnants of Hurricane Ike 3 days earlier, creating an environment favorable for the formation of radiation fog. Many of the fingers of river valley fog had formed in areas located between the METAR surface reporting stations, so there were not a lot of reports of fog across the region at that time.

View only this post Read Less

Gravity wave over Indiana, Ohio, and Michigan

Blog reader Michael Lawson wrote:Hi, I am a meteorologist working with Meridian Environmental Technology in Grand Forks, ND. A co-worker noticed a gravity wave feature in the visible over northern Indiana/northwest Ohio during the afternoon of September 15, 2008. Clouds moving into the feature would dissipate then reform once they... Read More

GOES-13 visible images

GOES-13 visible images

Blog reader Michael Lawson wrote:

Hi, I am a meteorologist working with Meridian Environmental Technology in Grand Forks, ND. A co-worker noticed a gravity wave feature in the visible over northern Indiana/northwest Ohio during the afternoon of September 15, 2008. Clouds moving into the feature would dissipate then reform once they propagated through the other side. Thought it would make an interesting topic!

Thanks for the tip, Michael. GOES-13 visible imagery (above) did indeed show the wave as it propagated northwestward (against the ambient flow) across northern Indiana/Ohio into southern Lower Michigan on 15 September 2008.

The dissipation of the stratocumulus cloud field with the passage of the wave might be explained by examining the rawinsonde data from Wilmington, Ohio (below) — note the presence of very dry air aloft, which could have been briefly mixed downward as the wave moved through (similar to what was seen with an apparent hydraulic jump over lower Michigan and southern Ontario on 08 May 2008).

Wilmington OH rawinsonde data

Wilmington OH rawinsonde data

View only this post Read Less