This website works best with a newer web browser such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Microsoft Edge. Internet Explorer is not supported by this website.

Valley fog in the Allegheny Plateau region of the northeastern US

AWIPS images of the 4-km resolution GOES-13 11-3.9 µm brightness temperature difference (BTD) or “legacy fog/stratus product” (above; click image to play animation) began to display a signal of increasing coverage of fog and/or stratus across parts of the Allegheny Plateau region of New York and Pennsylvania during the pre-dawn... Read More

GOES-13 11-3.9 µm legacy "fog/stratus product" (click image to play animation)

GOES-13 11-3.9 µm legacy "fog/stratus product" (click image to play animation)

AWIPS images of the 4-km resolution GOES-13 11-3.9 µm brightness temperature difference (BTD) or “legacy fog/stratus product” (above; click image to play animation) began to display a signal of increasing coverage of fog and/or stratus across parts of the Allegheny Plateau region of New York and Pennsylvania during the pre-dawn hours of 06 June 2012. Strong nocturnal radiational cooling — Bradford, Pennsylvania (station identifier KBFD)  dropped to an overnight low temperature of 37 F — was helping to promote the formation of valley fog.

A more quantitative alternative to the legacy  BTD “fog/stratus product” is a new GOES Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) Probability product, developed as part of ASPB/CIMSS participation in the GOES-R Proving Ground. Note that the legacy fog/stratus product cannot make the distinction between fog and elevated stratus features (such as those found northwest of Lake Ontario, and also in west central Pennsylvania) — but the IFR Probability product does accurately make this discrimination. A trend of increasing areal coverage and magnitude of IFR Probability was noted (below; click image to play animation), especially along the New York/Pennsylvania border region where locations across southern New York such as Wellville (station identifier KELZ), Elmira (station identifier KELM), and Binghamton (station identifier KBGM) had surface visibilities drop to 1/4 mile and cloud ceilings drop to 100-200 feet above ground level.

GOES-13 IFR Probability product (click image to play animation)

GOES-13 IFR Probability product (click image to play animation)

A comparison of 4-km resolution GOES-13 and the corresponding 1-km resolution POES AVHRR “fog/stratus product” images at 07:40 UTC or 3:40 AM local time (below) demonstrated the importance of improved spatial resolution for the detection of small-scale features such as valley fog.

POES AVHRR vs GOES-13 legacy BTD "fog/stratus product" images

POES AVHRR vs GOES-13 legacy BTD "fog/stratus product" images

Similarly, a comparison of 4-km resolution GOES-13 and the corresponding 375-meter resolution (projected onto a 1-km resolution AWIPS grid) “fog/stratus product” images just after 08:00 UTC or 4:00 AM local time (below) showed much greater detail associated with the narrow fingers of valley fog.

Suomi NPP VIIRS vs GOES-13 legacy BTD "fog/stratus product" images

Suomi NPP VIIRS vs GOES-13 legacy BTD "fog/stratus product" images

In addition, comparing the Suomi NPP VIIRS “fog/stratus product” with the VIIRS 0.7 µm Day/Night Band (DNB) image at that same time (below) showed that the DNB channel could detect a few of the narrow fingers of valley fog in far southwestern Pennsylvania and far northern Maryland that were obscured by high cirrus clouds (black features) on the “fog/stratus product” image. During periods of strong illumination from moonlight (as was the case on 06 June), the DNB can serve as a form of night-time visible channel imagery.

Suomi NPP VIIRS legacy BTD "fog/stratus product" vs VIIRS Day/Night Band image

Suomi NPP VIIRS legacy BTD "fog/stratus product" vs VIIRS Day/Night Band image

After sunrise, McIDAS images of GOES-13 0.63 µm visible channel data (below; click image to play animation) showed the widespread valley fog features across parts of New York and Pennsylvania, which subsequently dissipated with daytime heating and boundary layer mixing.

GOES-13 0.63 µm visible channel images (click image to play animation)

GOES-13 0.63 µm visible channel images (click image to play animation)

View only this post Read Less

Hail-producing thunderstorms in the Fairbanks, Alaska area

A cluster of thunderstorms developed over the interior of Alaska during the afternoon hours on 04 June 2012, and moved westward across the region — one of the stronger storms produced half-inch size hail in the Fairbanks area. AWIPS images of 375-meter resolution (projected onto a 1-km resolution AWIPS grid)... Read More

Suomi NPP VIIRS 11.45 µm IR image + 0.64 µm visible channel image

Suomi NPP VIIRS 11.45 µm IR image + 0.64 µm visible channel image

A cluster of thunderstorms developed over the interior of Alaska during the afternoon hours on 04 June 2012, and moved westward across the region — one of the stronger storms produced half-inch size hail in the Fairbanks area. AWIPS images of 375-meter resolution (projected onto a 1-km resolution AWIPS grid) Suomi NPP VIIRS 11.45 µm IR and 0.64 µm visible channel images (above) showed these storms before they moved over Fairbanks (station identifier PAFA); the coldest cloud-top IR brightness temperatures were -64º C, and the larger storm actually exhibited an “enhanced-V” signature (with a cold/warm thermal couplet differrence of 11º C).

A Fairbanks National Weather Service Special Weather Statement mentioned that the tops of the thunderstorms were around 40,000 feet. That height, along with the minimum VIIRS IR brightness temperature of -64º C suggests that the highest thunderstorm tops were overshooting the tropopause that was seen on a plot of the 00 UTC Fairbanks rawinsonde data (below).

Fairbanks, Alaska rawinsonde data (00 UTC 05 June)

Fairbanks, Alaska rawinsonde data (00 UTC 05 June)

View only this post Read Less

Mesoscale Convective Vortex in northwestern Arkansas

A large Mesoscale Convective System (MCS) developed over far northeastern Oklahoma during the pre-dawn hours on 04 June 2012, which eventually produced a Mesoscale Convective Vortex (MCV) that moved into northwestern Arkansas the following morning. AWIPS images of 4-km resolution GOES-13 10.7 µm... Read More

GOES-13 10.7 µm IR images + 0.63 µm visible images (click image to play animation)

GOES-13 10.7 µm IR images + 0.63 µm visible images (click image to play animation)

A large Mesoscale Convective System (MCS) developed over far northeastern Oklahoma during the pre-dawn hours on 04 June 2012, which eventually produced a Mesoscale Convective Vortex (MCV) that moved into northwestern Arkansas the following morning. AWIPS images of 4-km resolution GOES-13 10.7 µm IR images (at night) followed by 1-km resolution  GOES-13 0.63 µm visible channel images during the day (above) showed the large nocturnal canopy of cold clouds (with cloud-top IR brightness temperatures as cold as -76º C at 05:01 UTC) — then the dissipating convection revealed the cyclonic circulation of the MCV during the late morning hours. As the atmosphere destabilized with daytime heating, new thunderstorms were seen to develop in the vicinity of the MCV as it moved toward Little Rock, Arkansas (station identifier KLIT).

A comparison of a 1-km resolution MODIS 11.0 µm IR image with the corresponding 4-km resolution GOES-13 10.7 µm IR image at 08:15 UTC or 3:15 AM local time (below) demonstrated that finer-scale cloud top details (such as subtle anvil-top gravity waves) were apparent on the higher resolution MODIS image.  Note that the satellite features are displaced slightly to the northwest on the GOES-13 IR images — this is due to parallax error resulting from the large viewing angle from the GOES-East satellite.

MODIS 11.0 µm IR image + GOES-13 10.7 µm IR image

MODIS 11.0 µm IR image + GOES-13 10.7 µm IR image

These anvil-top gravity waves were even more evident on a comparison of 1-km resolution Suomi NPP VIIRS 11.45 µm IR channel and 0.7 µm Day/Night Band (DNB) images at 08:42 UTC or 3:42 AM local time (below). A full moon provided excellent illumination of the thunderstorm cloud top, allowing an very good night-time view of the subtle overshooting top and gravity wave structures (just as they might be seen on a daytime visible image). In addition, note that the city lights of the Wichita, Kansas area could be seen through the thin veil of cloud top cirrus along the northwestern edge of the storm.

Suomi NPP VIIRS 11.45 µm IR channel + 0.7 µm Day/Night Band images

Suomi NPP VIIRS 11.45 µm IR channel + 0.7 µm Day/Night Band images

As the MCV was approaching the Little Rock area, the CIMSS Cloud Top Cooling Rate product detected CTC rates in excess of 20º C per 15 minutes, just as the thunderstorms began to produce their first cloud-to-ground lightning strike at 17:45 UTC (below). This cluster of thunderstorms was responsible for a few reports of hail and damaging winds as it continued to move southeastward across Arkansas during the afternoon hours (SPC storm reports).

GOES-13 0.63 µm visible images + Cloud Top Cooling Rate + Cloud-to-ground lightning strikes

GOES-13 0.63 µm visible images + Cloud Top Cooling Rate + Cloud-to-ground lightning strikes

===============================

GOES-13/GOES-15 Sounder DPI Total Precipitable Water (click image to play animation)

GOES-13/GOES-15 Sounder DPI Total Precipitable Water (click image to play animation)

MCVs typically are sustained in regions of low shear and abundant moisture. A plot of 850-500 mb shear from the NAM for 1800 UTC on 4 June show very low values of vertical wind shear in place over Arkansas. GOES Sounder DPI Total Precipitable water (the loop above) shows that the MCV developed in an axis of enhanced moisture. The blended TPW product (a product that blends together GOES Sounder and GPS measurements of precipitable water) shows an axis of values at or above 100% of normal through the mid-south where the MCV formed.

A visible image loop (every half-hour) from June 4 2012 that shows the evolution of the system is below.

GOES-13 0.63 µm Visible Imagery (click image to play animation)

GOES-13 0.63 µm Visible Imagery (click image to play animation)

View only this post Read Less

White Rock Fire along the Nevada/Utah border

The White Rock Fire — likely caused by a lightning strike — began in far eastern Nevada (near the Nevada/Utah border) late in the day on 01 June 2012. The fire quickly grew in size on 02 June — and a comparison of GOES-15 (GOES-West) and GOES-13 (GOES-East) 0.63 µm visible channel... Read More

GOES-15 (left) and GOES-13 (right) 0.63 µm visible images (click image to play animation)

GOES-15 (left) and GOES-13 (right) 0.63 µm visible images (click image to play animation)

The White Rock Fire — likely caused by a lightning strike — began in far eastern Nevada (near the Nevada/Utah border) late in the day on 01 June 2012. The fire quickly grew in size on 02 June — and a comparison of GOES-15 (GOES-West) and GOES-13 (GOES-East) 0.63 µm visible channel images (above; click image to play animation) offered another good example of how the viewing ange of different satellites can help to highlight different features associated with a large wildfire.

An abundance of dry fuels helped this to become a very hot fire, which produced bursts of pyrocumulus clouds which rose high above the top of the thick smoke plume. With the afternoon sun in the west, the view from the GOES-West satellite yeilded bright illumination of the overshooting pyrocumulus towers, while the view from GOES-East gave a better view of the long shadows cast by the pyrocumulus towers. In addition, with a favorable forward scattering angle later in the day, GOES-East also provided a better depiction of the areal coverage of the airborne smoke (03 June / 01:00 UTC image comparison).

Sadly, an air tanker carrying fire retardant to help contain this wildfire crashed on the afternoon of 03 June, killing both crewmembers.

View only this post Read Less