Plots of weighting functions for the three GOES-16 ABI Water Vapor bands (7.3 µm, 6.9 µm and 6.2 µm) are shown below, calculated using rawinsonde data from Green Bay, Wisconsin and Gaylord, Michigan. With cold air and low values of Total Precipitable Water at these 2 sites (1.53 mm / 0.06 in and 1.88 mm / 0.07 in, respectively), the height of their weighting functions was shifted to significantly lower altitudes compared to what would be observed in a standard atmosphere. This enabled the contrasting thermal signature of the land/water boundaries to easily reach the satellite sensors, passing through what little moisture existed within the atmospheric column. While the peak of the violet 7.3 µm weighting function plots descended to the 879 hPa pressure level at both sites (which was approximately 1.2 km above the surface), a significant contribution could be seen originating from the surface itself.
![Weighting function plots for the three GOES-16 Water Vapor bands, calculated using rawinsonde data from Green Bay, Wisconsin [click to enlarge]](https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/02/180206_12utc_kgrb_wv_wf.jpeg)
Weighting function plots for the three GOES-16 Water Vapor bands, calculated using rawinsonde data from Green Bay, Wisconsin [click to enlarge]
![Weighting function plots for the three GOES-16 Water Vapor bands, calculated using rawinsonde data from Gaylord, Michigan [click to enlarge]](https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/02/180206_12utc_kapx_wv_wf.jpeg)
Weighting function plots for the three GOES-16 Water Vapor bands, calculated using rawinsonde data from Gaylord, Michigan [click to enlarge]
View only this post Read Less
![Weighting function plots for each of the three GOES-16 Water Vapor bands, calculated using 05 February/12 UTC rawinsonde data from Dodge City, Kansas [click to enlarge]](https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/02/180205_12utc_kddc_wv_wf.jpeg)
![Weighting function plots for each of the three GOES-16 Water Vapor bands, calculated using 06 February/00 UTC rawinsonde data from Amarillo, Texas [click to enlarge]](https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/02/180206_00utc_kama_wv_wf.jpeg)
![Landsat-8 False-color RGB image [click to enlarge]](https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/02/180204_1646utc_landsat8_falsecolor_Lake_Superior_ice.jpeg)
![Landsat-8 False-color RGB image [click to enlarge]](https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/02/180204_landsat8_zoom_1.jpeg)
![Landsat-8 False-color RGB image [click to enlarge]](https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/02/180204_landsat8_zoom_2.jpeg)
![Landsat-8 False-color RGB image [click to enlarge]](https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/02/180204_landsat8_zoom_3.jpeg)
![Landsat-8 False-color RGB image [click to enlarge]](https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/02/180204_landsat8_zoom_4.jpeg)
![GOES-16 Ash Height product [click to animate]](https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/02/haimage_52.png)
![Landsat-8 False-color RGB image [click to enlarge]](https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/02/180201_1624utc_landsat8_falsecolor_anim.gif)