This website works best with a newer web browser such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Microsoft Edge. Internet Explorer is not supported by this website.

Viewing the atmosphere around Iceland with JPSS Satellites and Polar2Grid

Iceland enjoyed a remarkable string of clement weather in mid-May. The true-color animation below, taken from the NASA Worldview site, shows almost a fortnight of clear skies!VIIRS gives a high-resolution view of the surface and cloud features as shown above. JPSS satellites carry sounder instruments used to create NUCAPS data; NUCAPS profiles... Read More

Iceland enjoyed a remarkable string of clement weather in mid-May. The true-color animation below, taken from the NASA Worldview site, shows almost a fortnight of clear skies!

VIIRS True-Color imagery from NASA Worldview over Iceland, 10-22 May 2025 (Click to enlarge)

VIIRS gives a high-resolution view of the surface and cloud features as shown above. JPSS satellites carry sounder instruments used to create NUCAPS data; NUCAPS profiles allow a meteorologist to view what’s going on within the troposphere. Both VIIRS and NUCAPS fields can be viewed using CSPP‘s polar2grid software using data downloaded from the cloud (here, for example, from Amazon Web Services). For the purposes of this blog post, I downloaded M03/M04/M05 SDR files (0.488 µm/0.555 µm/0.672 µm, i.e., blue, green, and red) and also I01 (0.64 µm) so the image could be sharpened, and the GITCO/GMTCO VIIRS files that contain georeferencing for I- and M-bands, respectively. (VIIRS Bands are defined here.) The data were downloaded for a daytime NOAA-20 overpass on 19 May 2025 that viewed Iceland between 1332 and 1336 UTC 19 May 2025. I also downloaded NUCAPS EDR files from the same AWS site. Then I ran the following commands in polar2grid (I’m using version 3.1) in a directory I created just under the bin directory in the polar2grid code distribution:

../p2g_grid_helper.sh Iceland -19.0 65.0 1500 -1500 1080 840 > Iceland.yaml
../polar2grid.sh -r nucaps -w geotiff -p Temperature_853mb -g Iceland --grid-configs ./Iceland.yaml -f /path/to/storedfiles/Iceland/NUCAP*
../polar2grid.sh -r viirs_sdr -w geotiff -p true_color_raw -g Iceland --grid-configs ./Iceland.yaml -f /path/to/storedfiles/Iceland/SV*
../add_colormap.sh ../../colormaps/p2g_sst_palette.txt j01_atms-cris_Temperature_853mb_20250519_133218_Iceland.tif       
../add_coastlines.sh --add-coastlines --add-colorbar --colorbar-text-size 18 --colorbar-height 40 j01_atms-cris_Temperature_853mb_20250519_133218_Iceland.tif       
../add_coastlines.sh --add-coastlines noaa20_viirs_true_color_raw_20250519_133136_Iceland.tif

The first command creates a grid (‘Iceland’) and stored grid parameters in a file (‘Iceland.yaml’). Next, polar2grid calls using first the nucaps reader and then the viirs_sdr reader, to create imagery of 853 mb Temperature, and of ‘raw’ True-color imagery on that pre-defined ‘Iceland’ grid. I added a predefined colormap (‘add_colormap.sh’) to the 853-mb data, and then a final command to draw coastlines and add a colorbar (for the temperature field). The annotation was added with ImageMagick commands. The toggle below shows the true-color imagery and the 853-mb temperatures.

NOAA-20 True Color imagery, and NOAA-20 NUCAPS 853-mb temperatures, ca. 1330 UTC on 19 May 2025 (Click to enlarge)

The warmest temperatures at 853 mb are just offshore of Greenland. That suggests to this blogger that there is wind downsloping off the Greenland ice sheet and warming dry adiabatically. That plume of warm air then moved out over the N. Atlantic to the north of Iceland. The coolest 853-mb temperatures might be linked to the glaciers of Iceland. The swirl patterns in the ocean ice off the coast of Greenland are also interesting to view.

View only this post Read Less

Rain development across the Samoan Islands

Night Microphysics RGB imagery over the Samoan Islands, above, saved from the CSPP Geosphere site, shows the characteristic color changes in the Night Microphysics RGB imagery from pink/salmon to dark red as lines of cumulus grow to thunderstorms. GREMLIN fields from the CIRA Slider, below, show the satellite-estimated MRMS fields. Rain starts... Read More

GOES-18 Night Microphysics RGB 1230-1540 UTC on 21 May 2025

Night Microphysics RGB imagery over the Samoan Islands, above, saved from the CSPP Geosphere site, shows the characteristic color changes in the Night Microphysics RGB imagery from pink/salmon to dark red as lines of cumulus grow to thunderstorms. GREMLIN fields from the CIRA Slider, below, show the satellite-estimated MRMS fields. Rain starts developing southeast of American Samoa, getting fairly intense after 1500 UTC.

GREMLIN fields around the Samoan Islands, 1330-1530 UTC on 21 May 2025. Click to enlarge.

The shower development occurred within a moist airmass, as diagnosed by the MIMIC Total Precipitable Water field shown below at 1400 UTC on 21 May 2025. (Source) The Samoan Island chain was near the southern edge of the moisture associated with the South Pacific Convergence Zone; to date in May, Pago Pago has received for than 18″ of rain, an amount that almost places May 2025 in the top ten of wet Mays at that station (the wettest May, with 29.1″, was 1999).

MIMIC TPW estimate, 1400 UTC on 21 May 2025 (Click to enlarge)

What kind of products might help a forecaster anticipate the convective development? GFS forecasts for the Galvez-Davison Index (source), below, show values consistently around 30, suggesting scattered showers and maybe a thunderstorm. (Values tomorrow there are forecast to be substantially higher; check back to see if it’s raining!)

GFS Forecast values of GDI, 0600 UTC to 1500 UTC 21 May 2025 (Click to enlarge)

For nearcasting/nowcasting convective development, consider the animation below. GOES-18 Derived Lifted Index values show the region (Values around -2) on the shoulder of an unstable area to the north, where Lifted Indices are close to -5. Low-level derived motion vectors from GOES-18 (in dark blue) show confluence over the Samoan Islands; winds are primarily easterly to the north of the islands, and more southeasterly to the south of the islands. Low-level winds are conducive to convective development and the airmass is moist. Upper-level winds are also plotted (in red) ; but an obvious divergent signal is lacking.

GOES-18 Clean Window Infrared (Band 13, 10.3 µm) imagery overlain with clear-sky-only Lifted Index values and Derived Motion Wind Vectors, 1300-1430 UTC on 21 May 2025 (Click to enlarge)

Legacy Profiles from GOES-18 augment model information with the temperature and moisture information within ABI’s 16 channels. The (clear-sky) locations at 1300 UTC are shown below, and a comparison between a profile in the deep moisture (where convection is not occurring) — at 11.4oS, 170oW — and a profile at the southwest edge of the domain shown — at 16oS, 173oW — shows the differences in moisture/stability (especially the level of the LFC) in the two regions.

GOES-18 Clean Window Infrared (band 13, 10.3 µm) along with GOES-18 Total Precipitable Water (TPW) and Legacy Profile locations, the latter two in clear skies, 1300 UTC on 21 May 2025 (Click to enlarge)
Legacy Profiles at 1300 UTC at the Lat/Lon shown in the figure. There is a significant difference in LFC and EL between the two profiles. (Click to enlarge)

LightningCast Probability fields (available here) give the probability of when a GLM observation of lightning is likely in the next 60 minutes. When the geographic distribution of the probability fields starts to change, that can mean something. The animation below stretches from 1330-1510 UTC on 21 May 2025. The probability contours expand south of American Samoa at 1450 UTC. This suggests development of some kind is happening there. By 1510 UTC, obvious convection is developing there!

For more information on Pago Pago’s weather, refer to the National Weather Service.

View only this post Read Less

Southeast Supercells

A shortwave impulse spawned numerous supercell thunderstorms in a highly unstable and well-sheared environment in the Southeast U.S. ProbSevere v3 readily tracked numerous severe and tornadic storms across the region.One storm in particular produced tornadoes in Madison, Alabama, and prompted a tornado emergency warning. In this example, the ProbTor v3 was much higher... Read More

A shortwave impulse spawned numerous supercell thunderstorms in a highly unstable and well-sheared environment in the Southeast U.S. ProbSevere v3 readily tracked numerous severe and tornadic storms across the region.

Figure 1: ProbSevere contours, MRMS MergedReflectivity, and NWS severe weather warnings (polygons). The inner storm contours are colored by the probability of any severe weather, whereas the outer storm contours are colored by the probability of tornado in the next hour.

One storm in particular produced tornadoes in Madison, Alabama, and prompted a tornado emergency warning. In this example, the ProbTor v3 was much higher than ProbTor v2, due to some unrepresentative environmental data in the RAP (used in ProbTor v2). The 52% value is very high for ProbTor, which uses MRMS, GOES, Earth Networks, and HRRR inputs.

Figure 2: The supercell prompting a tornado emergency for Madison and Huntsville, AL.

Looking at the time series of ProbSevere v2 vs. v3 (Figure 3), we notice a couple things:

  1. ProbSevere v3 was higher early in the storm’s lifetime, which has been a consistent finding. The ML models of v3 are more skillful when combining the environmental and observational parameters in nascent storms.
  2. ProbTor v3 does a much better job maintaining elevated probabilities for the majority of the storm’s lifetime. As implied previously, we believe this is due to more accurate environmental data in the HRRR model.
Figure 3: ProbSevere v2 and ProbSevere v3 probabilities for the supercell in northeast Mississippi and northern Alabama.

The long-lived supercell exhibited several lightning jumps. Shortly before the first tornado report at 23:20 UTC, there was a very large lightning jump (see the yellow bars in the image below). However, the large increase in flash rate was partially due to a storm merger, and not a meteorological intensification in updraft strength.

Figure 4: Time series of Earth Networks total lightning flash rate and lightning-jump-algorithm (LJA) sigma level.

I say partially, because the change in maximum GLM flash-extent density also increased, and before the storm merger at 23:10 UTC. The GLM flash-extent density (yellow line in Figure 5) shows increases around 23:00 UTC. This field is not affected by a storm-object’s boundaries. Therefore, it seems that intensification was already occurring in the tornadic storm when the storm merger happened. The merger did seem to either further intensify the flash rate in our supercell or at least did not impede the intensification that was already occurring.

Figure 5: GLM storm attributes for the tornadic supercell.

Lastly, the meteogram below shows values for some satellite-based storm attributes. The satellite growth rate (blue) is an important predictor for growing storms, and can help boost probabilities before radar predictors are nearing severe thresholds.

Once a storm is nearing or at maturity, the “intense convection probability” from IntenseStormNet provides a fused ABI+GLM-based perspective on the “intensity” of the storm. In this storm, the probability was over 95% for much its lifetime. The probability jumped up 8 minutes prior to the first local storm report at 20:52 UTC.

Figure 6: Time series of the satellite vertical growth rate and satellite-based “intense convection probability”.

These “intense” probabilities can also be plotted on a 2D view (Figure 7). This product works well for many developing and mature supercells, and could be useful on its own in lieu of radar data. Even with good radar coverage, we’ve found that it skillfully contributes to ProbSevere v3 models.

Figure 7: ProbSevere IntenseStormNet probability of “intense convection”, along with GOES-19 ABI C02+C13 sandwich imagery and preliminary local storm reports from NOAA’s Storm Prediction Center.

View only this post Read Less

Blowing dust prompts the issuance of the first Dust Storm Warning on record for the Chicago metro area

1-minute Mesoscale Domain Sector GOES-19 (GOES-East) daytime True Color RGB images created using Geo2Grid (above) showed blowing dust (shades of tan) — lofted by strong southerly thunderstorm outflow winds with gusts as high as 60-70 mph — as it moved northward across northeastern Illinois and northwestern Indiana (and eventually southern Lake Michigan... Read More

1-minute daytime GOES-19 True Color RGB images + nighttime Dust RGB images, from 2130 UTC on 16 May to 0200 UTC on 17 May [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

1-minute Mesoscale Domain Sector GOES-19 (GOES-East) daytime True Color RGB images created using Geo2Grid (above) showed blowing dust (shades of tan) — lofted by strong southerly thunderstorm outflow winds with gusts as high as 60-70 mph — as it moved northward across northeastern Illinois and northwestern Indiana (and eventually southern Lake Michigan and far southwestern Lower Michigan) during the afternoon and early evening hours on 16 May 2025. After sunset, Dust RGB images tracked the airborne dust (brighter shades of magenta) as it continued to move farther northward across southwestern Lower Michigan — surface visibility restrictions over that area after sunset were generally 4-5 miles, briefly dropping to 2.5 miles at Benton Harbor (KBEH) at 0102 UTC on 17 May .

Plots of Wind Barbs and Peak Wind Gusts greater than 50 kts along with Ceiling/Visibility (below) showed the northward progression of strongest winds — which began around 2100-2200 UTC with thunderstorm outflow peak gusts of 60 kts at Champaign (KCMI) at 2104 UTC, 53 kts at Decatur (KDEC) at 2055 UTC and 51 kts at Bloomington/Normal (KBMI) at 2153 UTC — and lower visibility (1/4 mi at KBMI from 2153-2200 UTC, and later dropping to 1/4 mi at Chicago/Midway KMDW from 2340-2345 UTC and then 1/4 mi at South Bend, Indiana KSBN at 0020 UTC).

Hourly plots of Surface Wind Barbs (white) and Ceiling/Visibility (cyan), along with 30-minute Peak Wind Gusts greater than 50 kts (red) [click to play MP4 animation]

Plots of 15-minute METAR Surface Reports along with Dust Storm Warning polygons across the greater Chicago area (below) included the first Dust Storm Warning on record that included the Chicago metro area.

Plots of 15-minute METAR Surface Reports, along with Dust Storm Warning polygons (light beige) and nearshore Gale Warning polygons (magenta) across the greater Chicago area [click to play MP4 animation]

A cursor sample of the Chicago O’Hare (KORD) METAR Surface Report at 0051 UTC on 17 May (below) listed the unusual combination of a thunderstorm with light rain (-TSRA) and blowing dust (BLDU). Plots of GLM Flash Points at 0045 UTC did show an isolated lighting flash just northwest of KORD.

Cursor sample of the Chicago O’Hare (KORD) METAR Surface Report (cyan) at 0051 UTC, along with GLM Flash Points (white) at 0045 UTC on 17 May [click to enlarge]

A Pilot Report east of Chicago Aurora Municipal Airport (KARR) at 0003 UTC on 17 May (below) indicated that the blowing dust was restricting the Flight Visibility to 1 statute mile at an altitude of 2400 ft (and the vertical visibility was 1700 ft during descent to Aurora). In a plot of surface report data from KARR, ceilometer data at 0002 UTC depicted the base of the dense dust layer aloft at an altitude 2300 ft (the surface visibility was 1 mile at that time).

Cursor sample of a Pilot Report (orange) over Illinois at 0003 UTC on 17 May [click to enlarge]

About 1.5 hours later, a Pilot Report over southern Lake Michigan at 0132 UTC (below) indicated that the Flight Visibility was 5 statute miles at an altitude of 4000 ft.

Cursor sample of a Pilot Report (orange) over Lake Michigan at 0132 UTC on 17 May [click to enlarge]

View only this post Read Less