This website works best with a newer web browser such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Microsoft Edge. Internet Explorer is not supported by this website.

Numerous wildfires in Oklahoma, and widespread blowing dust across the southern Plains

Aided by strong southwesterly winds gusting as high as 72 knots (83 mph) behind a cold front, more than 130 wildfires rapidly developed and spread across 44 counties in Oklahoma on 14 March 2025. 1-minute Mesoscale Domain Sector GOES-16 (GOES-East) Visible images (above) included overlays of 1-minute GOES-16 Fire Mask derived product (a component... Read More

1-minute GOES-16 Visible images with overlays of 1-minute GOES-16 Fire Mask derived product and 30-minute Peak Wind Gusts, from 1501 UTC on 14 March to 0000 UTC on 15 March [click to play MP4 animation]

Aided by strong southwesterly winds gusting as high as 72 knots (83 mph) behind a cold front, more than 130 wildfires rapidly developed and spread across 44 counties in Oklahoma on 14 March 2025. 1-minute Mesoscale Domain Sector GOES-16 (GOES-East) Visible images (above) included overlays of 1-minute GOES-16 Fire Mask derived product (a component of the Fire Detection and Characterization Algorithm, FDCA) and 30-minute Peak Wind Gusts —  which showed a marked increase in wildfire thermal signatures after about 1900 UTC. Notable wildfires affected the Oklahoma City (KOKC) area (and nearby Norman), in addition to Guthrie (KGOK) and Stillwater (KSWO) — prompting the issuance of Fire Warnings and evacuation notices for those (and many other) locations.  NGFS detections for some of these fires are shown in this blog post.

Incidentally, the wildfire just southwest of Stillwater (KSWO) burned through an Oklahoma Mesonet site from 2041-2045 UTC (2043 UTC GOES-16 image):

The strong winds responsible for the wildfires were also lofting large amounts of blowing dust across the Southern Plains. 5-minute CONUS Sector GOES-16 True Color RGB images from the CSPP GeoSphere site (below) displayed the broad swath of dense blowing dust (shades of tan) originating from New Mexico/Texas — as well as another plume of blowing dust moving south-southeastward from eastern Colorado to southwestern Kansas and northwestern Oklahoma (on the back side of a deep low pressure center). In addition, 2 large smoke plumes (pale shades of white) originating in Oklahoma were rising above the blowing dust as they eventually moved eastward and northeastward.

5-minute GOES-16 True Color RGB images, from 1501-2336 UTC on 14 March [click to play MP4 animation]

1-minute GOES-16 Visible images that included plots of Ceiling/Visibility (below) showed how the blowing dust and smoke restricted surface visibility at many locations across Oklahoma, down to values as low as 1/4 mile at times.

1-minute GOES-16 Visible images with overlays of 1-minute GOES-16 Fire Mask derived product and hourly plots of Ceiling/Visibility, from 1501 UTC on 14 March to 0000 UTC on 15 March [click to play MP4 animation]

===== 15 March Update =====

5-minute GOES-16 daytime True Color RGB + Nighttime Microphysics RGB images, from 1646 UTC on 14 March to 1646 UTC on 15 March [click to play MP4 animation]

A 24-hour animation of GOES-16 daytime True Color RGB + Nighttime Microphysics RGB images (above) showed the long-range transport of airborne dust from New Mexico/Texas to the western Great Lakes. Dust exhibited brighter shades of magenta in the Nighttime Microphysics RGB imagery.

A longer 36-hour animation of GOES-19 (Preliminary/Non-operational) Dust RGB images created using Geo2Grid (below) also highlighted the blowing dust as brighter shades of magenta. However, toward the end of the day on 15 March the magenta signature of the airborne dust became more muted as it moved northward from Wisconsin and Michigan toward far southern Ontario.

GOES-19 Dust RGB images, from 1201 UTC on 14 March to 2356 UTC on 15 March [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

View only this post Read Less

GOES-16 views the SpaceX Launch

Imagery from CSPP Geosphere (direct link), above, shows the condensation trail produced by the launch of the SpaceX rocket. Only routine CONUS 5-minute scanning was available to view the launch; very active weather over the southern Plains caused the GOES-16 mesoscale sectors to be positioned north and west of Florida. The 2303 UTC launch (news link), shortly before... Read More

Annotated CSPP Geosphere True Color/Night Microphysics RGB imagery over Cape Canaveral FL, 2301 – 2321 UTC on 14 March 2025 (Click to enlarge)

Imagery from CSPP Geosphere (direct link), above, shows the condensation trail produced by the launch of the SpaceX rocket. Only routine CONUS 5-minute scanning was available to view the launch; very active weather over the southern Plains caused the GOES-16 mesoscale sectors to be positioned north and west of Florida. The 2303 UTC launch (news link), shortly before sunset, created a crescent-shaped condensation trail at 2306 UTC as denoted by the arrow in the animation above. After sunset, Night Microphysics RGB imagery highlights the plume (also highlighted by the arrow) because of its different temperature compared to its surroundings. The rocket is destined for the Space Station and a crew exchange (News article).

__________

A special Mesoscale Domain Sector from GOES-19 (Preliminary/Non-operational data) provided imagery at 30-second intervals — and Rocket Plume RGB images created using Geo2Grid (below) revealed thermal signatures of the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket’s Stage 1 booster engines during the first 4 minutes after launch. The “boost-back burn” (to initiate the Stage 1 booster’s return to the launch site) signature was particularly notable at 23:06:55 UTC.

30-second GOES-19 Rocket Plume RGB images, from 23:03:25 UTC to 23:07:55 UTC on 14 March (courtesy Scott Bachmeier, CIMSS) [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

A closer view using 30-second GOES-19 Near-Infrared (1.38 µm / Band 4, 1.61 µm / Band 5 and 2.24 µm / Band 6) and Shortwave Infrared (3.9 µm / Band 7) images (below) displayed thermal signatures of the Stage 1 booster engines as the Falcon 9 rocket rapidly ascended northeast away from Cape Canaveral during the initial 2 minutes post-launch. In its wake, a more subtle signature of the rocket condensation cloud (that was highlighted above in GOES-16 RGB imagery) could be seen in the GOES-19 Band 4/5/6 images.

30-second GOES-19 Near-Infrared (1.38 µm, top left / 1.61 µm, top right / 2.24 µm, bottom left) and Shortwave Infrared (3.9 µm, bottom right) images (courtesy Scott Bachmeier, CIMSS) [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

View only this post Read Less

Early morning rumblers

I awoke to thunderstorms in Madison, Wisconsin this morning. The elevated storms were riding a warm front at 850 mb, fueled by moderate-to-strong warm-air advection.This was a good opportunity to look at ProbSevere LightningCast version 2, which includes Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) Reflectivity -10C as a predictor, along with several visible, near-infrared,... Read More

I awoke to thunderstorms in Madison, Wisconsin this morning. The elevated storms were riding a warm front at 850 mb, fueled by moderate-to-strong warm-air advection.

Figure 1: 850 mb winds, heights, and temperate advection, from 09Z to 11Z, as analyzed by the Storm Prediction Center’s mesoanalysis page. Note the warm-air advection over Wisconsin.

This was a good opportunity to look at ProbSevere LightningCast version 2, which includes Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) Reflectivity -10C as a predictor, along with several visible, near-infrared, and longwave-infrared bands from the GOES-R Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI). In the animation below, the contours in the left images were produced by LightningCast v1 (ABI-only predictors), whereas the contours in the right images were produced by LightningCast v2 (ABI + MRMS predictors). The background imagery is the GOES-16 IR-only cloud phase RGB and the blue foreground pixels are observed flash-extent density from the GOES-16 Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM).

The LightningCast v1 probabilities were lower for the storms in southern Wisconsin compared to LightningCast v2, which had elevated probabilities before lightning initiation. There are likely a couple of reasons that v1 probabilities are lower: 1) the short-wave reflective bands are not contributing at this time, and 2) overlapping mid- and high-level clouds may be obscuring the convective signal for the long-wave infrared predictors.

Overall, we’ve found that LightningCast v2 is very similar to v1, but outperforms v1 in important situations such as in new convective development under thick ice (e.g., anvil clouds), for convective decay, and sometimes in nocturnal convection. We have not seen significant degradation in regions without MRMS coverage or drops in lead time to lightning initiation when applying LightningCast v2.

This new version of LightningCast will be evaluated at the NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed in May and June of this year.

Figure 2: Left: LightningCast v1 probabilities (contours). Right: LightningCat v2 probabilities. The higher probabilities correspond with GLM observations of lightning, highlighting better performance for the v2 model in this case.

View only this post Read Less

Lunar Eclipse effects on the Day Night Band

Imagery from the VIIRS Today website, shown below, shows the stark effects of the Lunar Eclipse on Day Night Band imagery. Suomi NPP and NOAA-20 passes over the east coast (shown below; it happened with NOAA-21 too!) lack the reflected moonlight that was available over the central/western United States after the lunar eclipse... Read More

Imagery from the VIIRS Today website, shown below, shows the stark effects of the Lunar Eclipse on Day Night Band imagery. Suomi NPP and NOAA-20 passes over the east coast (shown below; it happened with NOAA-21 too!) lack the reflected moonlight that was available over the central/western United States after the lunar eclipse had ended. This will happen again on September 7th this year. Mark your calendars.

Suomi-NPP Day Night Band visible (0.7 µm) imagery, 14 March 2025 (Click to enlarge)
NOAA-20 Day Night Band visible (0.7 µm) imagery, 14 March 2025 (Click to enlarge)

Suomi-NPP overflew the eastern USA around 0720 UTC; NOAA-20 overflew around 0745 UTC; NOAA-21 overflew around 0700 UTC.

Contrast, below, NOAA-21 overpasses (imagery taken from the CIMSS VIIRS Viewer) at 0651 and 0831 UTC. With no reflected lunar illumination in the earlier overpass, aurora over northern Canada are far easier to view (Note also the lightning streaks over the ocean). It’s a bit harder to see the full extent of the aurora in the more illuminated overpass at 0831 UTC.

NOAA-21 Day Night Band visible (0.7 µm) imagery along the east coast ca. 0651 UTC (mostly dark), and over the central USA ca. 0831 UTC (illuminated) on 15 March 2025 (Click to enlarge)

Bob Carp, SSEC, created the following animation using McIDAS-V. It shows swaths from Suomi-NPP, NOAA-20 and NOAA-21. You’ll see that DNB imagery is starting to dim at 0507 UTC and starts to brighten up by 0832 UTC. This website gives times when the effects of the eclipse were expected: The penumbral part of the eclipse was from 0357 UTC to 1000 UTC; a partial eclipse was from 0509 UTC to 0847 UTC; totality was from 0626 UTC to 0731 UTC.


In addition, shown below is a similar animation (created using AWIPS) that steps through Day/Night Band images from Suomi-NPP + NOAA-21 (white labels) and NOAA-20 (cyan labels).

VIIRS Day/Night Band images from Suomi-NPP + NOAA-21 (white labels) and NOAA-20 (cyan labels) [courtesy Scott Bachmeier, CIMSS; click to enlarge]

View only this post Read Less