This website works best with a newer web browser such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Microsoft Edge. Internet Explorer is not supported by this website.

The moving shadow of Denali

Clear skies over much of Alaska on 12 March meant that GOES-17 had a clear view of Denali.  The animation above, of GOES-17 CIMSS True Color imagery, shows the shadow of Denali (near the center of the imagery, due north of Cook Inlet) moving during the day.A higher-resolution animation, below,... Read More

GOES-17 CIMSS True Color Imagery, 1650 UTC 12 March – 0230 UTC 13 March 2021 (Click to enlarge)

Clear skies over much of Alaska on 12 March meant that GOES-17 had a clear view of Denali.  The animation above, of GOES-17 CIMSS True Color imagery, shows the shadow of Denali (near the center of the imagery, due north of Cook Inlet) moving during the day.

A higher-resolution animation, below, using only the 0.64 µm visible imagery, from 1610 UTC on 12 March to 0240 UTC on 13 March 2021, also shows the changing of the shadow during the day.

GOES-17 Visible (0.64 µm) Imagery, 1610 UTC 12 March – 0240 UTC 13 March 2021 (Click to enlarge)

View only this post Read Less

Using NUCAPS data to judge model performance before a storm

A potent winter storm is on tap for eastern Colorado (and surroundings) over the weekend.  As with any system bringing heavy snow, knowing the storm path is crucial.  From a recent Boulder WFO Forecast Discussion, available here:   “Recent models runs in the GFS and ECMWF have trended more to the... Read More

NUCAPS representation of tropopause height (10:26 UTC, in millibars) and Rapid Refresh model estimate of tropopause height (1000 UTC). Click to enlarge)

A potent winter storm is on tap for eastern Colorado (and surroundings) over the weekend.  As with any system bringing heavy snow, knowing the storm path is crucial.  From a recent Boulder WFO Forecast Discussion, available here:   “Recent models runs in the GFS and ECMWF have trended more to the north while the Canadian stays to the south.”  The toggles above and below compare NUCAPS satellite-based observations of tropopause pressure (NUCAPS at 1023 UTC above, at 0843 UTC below) with 40-km Rapid Refresh model estimates (1000 UTC above, 0900 UTC below) of the tropopause pressure.  Can you use the NUCAPS depiction of the tropopause to convince yourself that the model — the Rapid Refresh in this case — has the proper initialization/evolution of the impulse that will generate the snowfall?  (Note that the colormaps for all images are the same).

NUCAPS representation of tropopause height (08:44 UTC, in millibars) and Rapid Refresh model estimate of tropopause height (0900 UTC, in millibars). Click to enlarge)

A challenge with this storm at this time is that the neither of the NOAA-20 NUCAPS fields available in AWIPS themselves sample the entirety of the tropopause fold.  One might use the 0844 UTC imagery above to conclude that the Rapid Refresh is too slow in the eastward progress of the storm.  It’s difficult to make the same conclusion from the 1026 UTC image, however, at top.  Ozone anomalies (shown below) from the NASA SPoRT gridded NUCAPS site (link) include the Suomi-NPP pass (in between the two NOAA-20 passes above) that does more completely sample the tropopause fold at one time;  however, those data are not available in the baseline AWIPS.  Perhaps the afternoon pass from NOAA-20 will offer better coverage.  (Update, below:  It did!)

Gridded NUCAPS estimates of ozone anomaly at 0840 (NOAA-20), 0931 (Suomi NPP) and 1023 (NOAA-20) UTC (click to enlarge)

Gridded Tropopause height fields and gridded ozone fields, shown below, do agree very well; use them interchangeably to identify tropopause folds.  The two fields are derived from different CrIS channels in NUCAPS.

Ozone concentrations and Tropopause pressure from NUCAPS, 0844 UTC on 12 March 2021 (Click to enlarge)


The 2000 UTC NOAA-20 overpass more completely sampled the upper tropospheric feature.  See below.  The placement of the feature in the Rapid Refresh looks approximately correct over the southwestern United States (that is, NUCAPS observations seem to overlap Rapid Refresh features);  there are some dissimilarities in features over the Dakotas:  farther north in NUCAPS, farther south in the Rapid Refresh.

NUCAPS representation of tropopause height (20:05 UTC, in millibars) and Rapid Refresh model estimate of tropopause height (2000 UTC, in millibars). Click to enlarge)

View only this post Read Less

Cyclone Habana in the South Indian Ocean

US Space Force EWS-G1 Infrared Window (10.7 µm) images (above) displayed the well-defined eye and eyewall structure of Cyclone Habana in the South Indian Ocean on 10 March 2021. This was the second period of Category 4 intensity (ADT | SATCON) during the life cycle of Habana.Meteosat-8 Infrared images with... Read More

US Space Force EWS-G1 Infrared Window (10.7 µm) images [click to play animation | MP4]

US Space Force EWS-G1 Infrared Window (10.7 µm) images [click to play animation | MP4]

US Space Force EWS-G1 Infrared Window (10.7 µm) images (above) displayed the well-defined eye and eyewall structure of Cyclone Habana in the South Indian Ocean on 10 March 2021. This was the second period of Category 4 intensity (ADT | SATCON) during the life cycle of Habana.

Meteosat-8 Infrared images with contours of deep-layer wind shear from the CIMSS Tropical Cyclones site (below) showed that Habana was moving through an environment of relatively low shear.

Meteosat-8 Infrared images, with contours of deep-layer wind shear [click to enlarge]

Meteosat-8 Infrared images, with contours of deep-layer wind shear [click to enlarge]

Meteosat-8 Infrared images with an overlay of 1505 UTC Metop ASCAT winds (below) depicted a fairly uniform distribution of winds within the eyewall region, as Habana developed an annular structure.

Meteosat-8 Infrared images, with a plot of Metop ASCAT winds [click to enlarge]

Meteosat-8 Infrared images, with a plot of Metop ASCAT winds [click to enlarge]

SSMIS Microwave (85 GHz) images from DMSP-16 at 1139 UTC and DMSP-18 at 2327 UTC are shown below.

DMSP-16 SSMIS Microwave (85 GHz) image at 1139 UTC [click to enlarge]

DMSP-16 SSMIS Microwave (85 GHz) image at 1139 UTC [click to enlarge]

DMSP-18 SSMIS Microwave (85 GHz) image at 2327 UTC [click to enlarge]

DMSP-18 SSMIS Microwave (85 GHz) image at 2327 UTC [click to enlarge]

 

View only this post Read Less

Satellite-based detection of rain amounts

The system that produced the high-impact flooding event on Maui (discussed here) also  caused flooding rains on Oahu on the 9th.   (A Flash Flood Emergency was declared at 348 HST on 9 March:  Link)  How well did quantitative satellite estimates of this event perform?  Hydroestimator values, above, from the 24... Read More

Hydroestimator rainfall values for the 24 hours ending 1200 UTC on 9 March 2021 (Click to enlarge)

The system that produced the high-impact flooding event on Maui (discussed here) also  caused flooding rains on Oahu on the 9th.   (A Flash Flood Emergency was declared at 348 HST on 9 March:  Link)  How well did quantitative satellite estimates of this event perform?  Hydroestimator values, above, from the 24 hours ending 1200 UTC on 9 March (from this website) show isolated maxima over northern Oahu for and over eastern Maui. Daily totals for the 24 hours ending 1200 UTC on 10 March are shown below.  Again, heavy rain is diagnosed on Maui with lesser amounts over Oahu, where 48-hour  totals  were between  150  and  200  mm.

Hydroestimator rainfall values for the 24 hours ending 1200 UTC on 10 March 2021 (Click to enlarge)

GSMAP rain totals for the 24 hours ending 0000 UTC on 10 March 2021 (click to enlarge)

24-hour totals from JAXA’s GsMAP website, above, show large values mostly north of Oahu, and also just north of Maui.  Values are between 100-150 mm.  24-hour CMORPH-2 values (from RealEarth), below, ending 0000 UTC on 10 March, show values between 50 and 100 mm.  Values over Maui are less than 50 mm.

CMORPH-2 24-h precipitation ending 0000 UTC on 10 March 2021 (Click to enlarge)

The GOES-17 Enterprise algorithm totals, below (courtesy Bob Kuligowski, NOAA) , show values close to 50 mm over Oahu, and over 50 mm on Maui.

24-hour rain totals from the GOES-17 algorithm, 1200 UTC on 10 March 2021 (Click to enlarge)

None of these rain totals captured the exceptional nature (writeup is here;  some totals are here) of this orographically enhanced rainfall. The widespread nature of the rain was captured however.  All methods detected heaviest rain north of the Island chain.

GOES-17 animations, both visible and infrared, combined with situational awareness driven by animations of total precipitable water, such as that below (from this site) will help a forecaster anticipate heavy rains however — when they might start, and when they might end.

10-day rocking animation, 0000 UTC 28 February 2021 to 2300 UTC 10 March 2021 (and back) (Click to enlarge)

View only this post Read Less