This website works best with a newer web browser such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Microsoft Edge. Internet Explorer is not supported by this website.

Surprise ACCAS

Altocumulus castellanus clouds (ACCAS) unexpectedly developed in southern Wisconsin yesterday morning, producing beautiful cloud features and eventually a severe thunderstorm. ACCAS form due to mid-level instability and manifest in towering billows that can often produce pileus clouds as they burst through a more stable layer.The rooftop cameras of the UW-AOSS building caught... Read More

Altocumulus castellanus clouds (ACCAS) unexpectedly developed in southern Wisconsin yesterday morning, producing beautiful cloud features and eventually a severe thunderstorm. ACCAS form due to mid-level instability and manifest in towering billows that can often produce pileus clouds as they burst through a more stable layer.

The mid-level ACCAS clouds, with convective towers producing pileus, as seen from south UW-Madison campus. Courtesy of Jon Wade, UW Athletics.

The rooftop cameras of the UW-AOSS building caught this development nicely.

West view from rooftop camera
South view from rooftop camera.

A model sounding from the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) did hint at mid-level instability due to an elevated mixed layer atop a temperature inversion. The model shows a mid-level lapse rate of 8.7 C/km and 155 J/kg of most-unstable CAPE (MUCAPE). However, the model did not forecast convection or precipitation.

Sounding plot from southern Wisconsin.
Skew-T / Log-P diagram and associated sounding metrics from the HRRR model, for Madison, Wisconsin.

There is some evidence that frontogenesis at 700mb may have served as a forcing mechanism for the convection, but it remains uncertain.

700 mb height, wind, temperature, and frontogenesis from the Storm Prediction Center mesoanalysis.

The NOAA/CIMSS LightningCast model caught this ACCAS development, and predicted elevated probabilities of lightning 20-45 minutes prior to first flashes (depending on position in the line).

GOES-19 LightningCast contours, ABI true-color imagery, and GLM flash-extent density.

Several cells produced 1″ hail in far southeastern Wisconsin.

SPC preliminary severe hail reports. All reports were for 1″-diameter hailstones.

The ProbSevere v3 models (PSv3) never exceeded 19% on these cells. However, an experimental image-based AI model produced > 50% probability of severe for several time steps (it predicts the probability of any severe hazards within the next 45 minutes and 20 km). The image-based approach may be able to better exploit spatial context and multi-modal signals from meteorological observations than the tree-based PSv3.

The image-based ML model (“PSCNN”) contours, MRMS MergedReflectivity, and NWS severe weather warnings valid at 17:50 UTC.

As a meteorologist, it is not always pleasant to be surprised by unexpected weather, but it is always a delight to behold beauty and wonder in the sky.

View only this post Read Less

Brantley Highway 82 wildfire in southeast Georgia

1-minute Mesoscale Domain Sector GOES-19 (GOES-East) True Color RGB images from the CSPP GeoSphere site (above) highlighted notable smoke plumes from two large wildfires in southeast Georgia (the Pineland Road Fire near the Florida border, and the Brantley Highway 82 Fire farther to the northeast), in addition to another wildfire in northern Florida on 21 April 2026. Those... Read More

1-minute GOES-19 True Color RGB images, from 1259-2049 UTC on 21 April [click to play MP4 animation]

1-minute GOES-19 True Color RGB images, from 1259-2049 UTC on 21 April [click to play MP4 animation]

1-minute Mesoscale Domain Sector GOES-19 (GOES-East) True Color RGB images from the CSPP GeoSphere site (above) highlighted notable smoke plumes from two large wildfires in southeast Georgia (the Pineland Road Fire near the Florida border, and the Brantley Highway 82 Fire farther to the northeast), in addition to another wildfire in northern Florida on 21 April 2026. Those particular wildfires were burning in parts of Georgia and Florida that were experiencing Exceptional Drought conditions.

1-minute GOES-19 GeoColor RGB images with an overlay of Next Generation Fire System (NGFS) Fire Detection polygons (below) provided a close-up view of the smoke plume and thermal signature associated with the Brantley Highway 82 wildfire in southeast Georgia — which was nearly under control at 700 acres in size during the early morning hours on 21 April, but then quickly grew out of control as surface winds abruptly shifted to the northeast then to the east (occasionally gusting to 22-23 mph), with the fast-moving wildfire burning an area of 5000 acres by the end of the day. Numerous evacuation orders were issued, about 87 homes were destroyed and schools throughout Brantley County were closed due to air quality concerns.

1-minute GOES-19 GeoColor RGB images with an overlay of NGFS Fire Detection polygons and plots of Surface Observations, from 1259-2201 UTC on 21 April [click to play MP4 animation]

1-minute GOES-19 GeoColor RGB images with an overlay of NGFS Fire Detection polygons and plots of Surface Observations, from 1259-2201 UTC on 21 April [click to play MP4 animation]

At 1758 UTC, the wildfire first exhibited a 3.9 µm shortwave infrared brightness temperature of 138ºC (below) — which is the saturation temperature of GOES-19 ABI Band 7 detectors. Also of note, at that time the Fire Radiative Power of the thermal signature was a rather high 6594 MW.

GOES-19 GeoColor RGB image at 1758 UTC on 21 April, with a probe of the hottest NGFS Fire Detection polygon [click to enlarge]

Periodic bursts of brighter-white pyrocumulus clouds rose above the hazy gray smoke plume, such as was seen just west of the fire’s thermal anomaly at 2019 UTC (below).

GOES-19 GeoColor RGB image with an overlay of NGFS Fire Detection polygons at 2019 UTC on 21 April [click to enlarge]

GOES-19 GeoColor RGB image with an overlay of NGFS Fire Detection polygons at 2019 UTC on 21 April [click to enlarge]

View only this post Read Less

Standing wave cloud over the north shoreline of Saginaw Bay

5-minute CONUS Sector GOES-19 (GOES-East) imagery (above) revealed the brief development of what appeared to be a standing wave cloud — caused by a vertically-propagating gravity wave — that was anchored near the north coast of Saginaw Bay, Michigan on 20 April 2026. At first glance, this author was reminded of similar-appearing standing... Read More

5-minute GOES-19 Visible images (top left), Infrared images (top right), Mid-level Water Vapor images (bottom left) and Upper-level Water Vapor images (bottom right), from 1951 UTC on 20 April to 0001 UTC on 21 April; hourly surface wind barbs are plotted in white [click to play MP4 animation]

5-minute CONUS Sector GOES-19 (GOES-East) imagery (above) revealed the brief development of what appeared to be a standing wave cloud — caused by a vertically-propagating gravity wave — that was anchored near the north coast of Saginaw Bay, Michigan on 20 April 2026. At first glance, this author was reminded of similar-appearing standing wave clouds that form along the Minnesota coast of Lake Superior.

A toggle between GOES-19 images and Topography (below) seemed to show that the northwestern edge of the cloud feature lined up with the final (subtle) drop in topography near the coast — however, since there was not the strong NW offshore surface wind flow common to the aforementioned Minnesota example, perhaps the onshore (and slightly upslope) lake breeze played a role in vertical gravity wave initiation? Until a sound explanation rooted in science is stumbled upon, this event will fall into the coveted “What the heck is this?” blog post category.

GOES-19 Visible/Infrared/Water Vapor images at 2136 UTC on 20 April, compared with Topography; Surface Wind barbs are plotted in white [click to enlarge]

View only this post Read Less

Lake effect cloud plume produces light snow downwind of the Great Salt Lake

5-minute CONUS Sector GOES-18 (GOES-West) and GOES-19 (GOES-East) Nighttime Microphysics RGB + daytime True Color RGB images from the CSPP GeoSphere site (above) showed a lake effect cloud plume that developed over the southern half of Great Salt Lake on 17 April 2026 — which produced a swath of light snowfall downwind (southeast) of the lake... Read More

5-minute GOES-18 (left) and GOES-19 (right) Nighttime Microphysics RGB + daytime True Color RGB images, from 0401-1556 UTC on 17 April [click to play MP4 animation]

5-minute CONUS Sector GOES-18 (GOES-West) and GOES-19 (GOES-East) Nighttime Microphysics RGB + daytime True Color RGB images from the CSPP GeoSphere site (above) showed a lake effect cloud plume that developed over the southern half of Great Salt Lake on 17 April 2026 — which produced a swath of light snowfall downwind (southeast) of the lake that was apparent in True Color RGB images after sunrise.

Day Snow-Fog RGB images from GOES-18 and GOES-19 created using Geo2Grid (below) were helpful in discriminating between the lake effect clouds (shades of white) and the fresh snow cover (shades of red) immediately downwind of the Great Salt Lake after sunrise. Bare ground appeared as shades of green.

5-minute Day Snow-Fog RGB images from GOES-18 (left) and GOES-19 (right), from 1331-1801 UTC on 17 April [click to play MP4 animation]

A plot of the 24-hour total observed snowfall (below) indicated that amounts were generally 1 inch or less at lower-elevation sites downwind of the Great Salt Lake (with 2 sites near topographical features reporting 3.0 inches).

Plot of 24-hour total observed snowfall ending at 1200 UTC on 17 April [click to enlarge]

Plot of 24-hour total observed snowfall ending at 1200 UTC on 17 April [click to enlarge]

GOES-18 Infrared images (below) depicted cloud-top infrared brightness temperatures within the lake effect cloud plume that were as cold as -35ºC. Note that Salt Lake City International Airport (KSLC) was reporting light snow which reduced the surface visibility to 8 miles at 0454 UTC, as the lake effect cloud was moving over that location.

5-minute GOES-18 Infrared images, from 0401-1201 UTC on 17 April [click to play MP4 animation]

5-minute GOES-18 Infrared images, from 0401-1201 UTC on 17 April [click to play MP4 animation]

According to a plot of 0000 UTC rawinsonde data from Salt Lake City (below), an air temperature of -35ºC occurred at an elevation of 5900 m (19358 ft). Since the water temperature of the lake was around 50ºF or 10ºC that day, the surface temperature of the sounding was modified to match that value.

Plot of rawinsonde data from Salt Lake City at 0000 UTC on 17 April [click to enlarge]

Surface-temperature-modified plot of rawinsonde data from Salt Lake City at 0000 UTC on 17 April [click to enlarge]

View only this post Read Less