This website works best with a newer web browser such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Microsoft Edge. Internet Explorer is not supported by this website.

The 1974 Super Outbreak as seen by ATS-3

The 3-4 April 1974 Super Outbreak (NWS Wilmington OH | Wikipedia | StoryMap | Interacive WebMap | Monthly Weather Review) was one of the largest and most deadly tornado outbreaks on record in the United States. Several images from the ATS-3 satellite are shown below (thanks to the work of SSEC Satellite Data Services and Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences Library staff!). The... Read More

The 3-4 April 1974 Super Outbreak (NWS Wilmington OH | Wikipedia | StoryMap | Interacive WebMap | Monthly Weather Review) was one of the largest and most deadly tornado outbreaks on record in the United States. Several images from the ATS-3 satellite are shown below (thanks to the work of SSEC Satellite Data Services and Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences Library staff!). The University of Wisconsin-Madison Space Science and Engineering Center recently digitized over 66,000 Applications Technology Satellite (ATS)-1 and -3 images from the late 1960s to early 1970s. ATS-1 and -3 were experimental NASA geostationary satellites that carried Verner Suomi’s Spin-Scan Cloud Camera (SSCC). The camera, developed at UW/SSEC, allowed for nearly continuous viewing (usually every 30 minutes) of weather systems. Some of these images have been added to the UW Digital Collections (The “Super Outbreak“). Much work remains to prepare the larger dataset for use, including adding day/time stamps, quality control and navigation correction of the images.

ATS-3 Visible imagery from 1126-2022 UTC on April 3, 1974.

The SSCC on ATS-1 and -3 had only visible spectral bands, hence only provided imagery during the daylight hours.

15-minute Imagery

Normally, the ATS-3 acquired a Full Disk scan approximately every 30 minutes — but during this event two Northern Hemisphere sectors were scanned, providing 15-minute imagery for part of April 3, 1974. Individual images from 1941 UTC to 2307 UTC are displayed below. Large clusters of thunderstorms that produced many of the tornadoes were very apparent, along with a hazy plume of blowing dust that moved across much of North Texas in the wake of a strong cold front (surface analysis).

ATS-3 Visible images, 1941 UTC and 1955 UTC [click to enlarge]
ATS-3 Visible images, 2007 UTC and 2022 UTC [click to enlarge]
ATS-3 Visible images, 2034 UTC and 2049 UTC [click to enlarge]
ATS-3 Visible images, 2100 UTC and 2114 UTC [click to enlarge]
ATS-3 Visible images, 2126 UTC and 2140 UTC [click to enlarge]
ATS-3 Visible images, 2153 UTC and 2207 UTC [click to enlarge]
ATS-3 Visible images, 2219 UTC and 2232 UTC [click to enlarge]
ATS-3 Visible images, 2245 UTC and 2259 UTC [click to enlarge]
ATS-3 Visible image, 2307 UTC [click to enlarge]

View only this post Read Less

Anniversary of the Super Outbreak of 1974

This year will mark the 50th anniversary of the “Super Outbreak” of April 1974. The event was unique for the number of tornado touchdowns, the number of F5 tornadoes, and the conditions that fostered their formation. Also unique is that the University of Wisconsin-Madison Space Science and Engineering Center recently... Read More

This year will mark the 50th anniversary of the “Super Outbreak” of April 1974. The event was unique for the number of tornado touchdowns, the number of F5 tornadoes, and the conditions that fostered their formation. Also unique is that the University of Wisconsin-Madison Space Science and Engineering Center recently digitized over 66,000 Applications Technology Satellite (ATS)-1 and -3 images from the late 1960s to early 1970s. These include ATS-3 visible images from April 3, 1974 that clearly show the development of the squall lines. ATS were experimental NASA geostationary satellites that carried the Spin Scan Cloud Camera. The camera, developed at SSEC, allowed for nearly continuous viewing of weather systems, like the Super Outbreak.

Northern Hemispheric views from the ATS-3 of the Super Outbreak on April 3, 1974.

The 3-4 April 1974 Super Outbreak (NWS Wilmington OH | Wikipedia | Interacive WebMap | Monthly Weather Review) was one of the largest and most deadly tornado outbreaks on record in the United States. Several images from the ATS-3 satellite are shown below (thanks to the work of SSEC Satelite Data Services and Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences Library staff!). Large clusters of thunderstorms that produced the tornadoes are very apparent, along with a hazy plume of blowing dust that moved across much of North Texas.

Northern Hemispheric views from the ATS-3 of the Super Outbreak on April 3, 1974 (Click to play).
ATS-3 Visible images, 1941 UTC and 1955 UTC [click to enlarge]
ATS-3 Visible images, 2007 UTC and 2022 UTC [click to enlarge]
 ATS-3 Visible images, 2034 UTC and 2049 UTC [click to enlarge]
 AS-3ATS-3 Visible images, 2100 UTC and 2114 UTC [click to enlarge]
 ATS-3 Visible images, 2126 UTC and 2140 UTC [click to enlarge]
 ATS-3 Visible images, 2153 UTC and 2207 UTC [click to enlarge]
 ATS-3 Visible images, 2219 UTC and 2232 UTC [click to enlarge]
 ATS-3 Visible images, 2245 UTC and 2259 UTC [click to enlarge]
 ATS-3 Visible images, 2307 UTC [click to enlarge]

HT

This blog post leverages a similar post from 2023.

View only this post Read Less

Widespread outbreak of severe thunderstorms across the Midwest and South

With a strong midlatitude cyclone centered over Iowa on 31 March 2023, the Storm Prediction Center (SPC) outlined 2 areas of relatively rare High Risk for severe weather — and GOES-16 (GOES-East) Total Precipitable Water along with the Lifted Index (LI) and Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE) Derived Stability Indices (above) showed that a corridor of moisture and instability... Read More

GOES-16 Total Precipitable Water, Lifted Index and Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE) derived products [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

With a strong midlatitude cyclone centered over Iowa on 31 March 2023, the Storm Prediction Center (SPC) outlined 2 areas of relatively rare High Risk for severe weather — and GOES-16 (GOES-East) Total Precipitable Water along with the Lifted Index (LI) and Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE) Derived Stability Indices (above) showed that a corridor of moisture and instability was in place along and ahead of the primary cold front (surface analyses).

1-minute Mesoscale Domain Sector GOES-16 “Clean” Infrared Window (10.3 µm) images (below) included plots of time-matched (+/- 3 minutes) SPC Storm Reports during the period from 1615 UTC on 31 March to 1137 UTC on 01 April.

GOES-16 “Clean” Infrared Window (10.3 µm) images, with time-matched SPC Storm Reports plotted in cyan [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

One event of note was the EF3-rated tornado that affected Little Rock, Arkansas — GOES-16 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) and “Clean” Infrared Window (10.3 µm) images (below) included time-matched SPC Storm Reports.

GOES-16 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm, top) and “Clean” Infrared Window (10.3 µm, bottom) images, with time-matched SPC Storm Reports plotted in red/cyan [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

1-minute GOES-16 Visible/Infrared Sandwich RGB images (below) included polygons of Severe Thunderstorm and Tornado Warnings — note that at one point a bold Tornado Emergency was issued.

GOES-16 Visible/Infrared Sandwich RGB images, with polygons of Severe Thunderstorm and Tornado Warnings plotted in yellow/red [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

Farther to the north, 1-minute GOES-16 Visible images (below) showed the widespread severe weather across the Midwest during the daytime hours.

GOES-16 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm, top) images, with time-matched SPC Storm Reports plotted in red [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

1-minute GOES-16 Visible/Infrared Sandwich RGB images (below) included plots of time-matched Local Storm Reports — showing the storm which produced an EF4-rated tornado that moved from Wapello into Johnson County in eastern Iowa (NWS Quad Cities summary).

GOES-16 Visible/Infrared Sandwich RGB images, with time-matched Local Storm Reports plotted in red [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

View only this post Read Less

Predicting lightning initiation with AI

The NOAA/CIMSS ProbSevere LightningCast model uses GOES-R ABI reflectances and brightness temperatures along with artificial intelligence methods to predict next-hour lightning anywhere in the GOES-R field of view. It is particularly adept at nowcasting lightning initiation. A long, potent cold front spawned a number of storms from Iowa to Texas today... Read More

The NOAA/CIMSS ProbSevere LightningCast model uses GOES-R ABI reflectances and brightness temperatures along with artificial intelligence methods to predict next-hour lightning anywhere in the GOES-R field of view. It is particularly adept at nowcasting lightning initiation.

A long, potent cold front spawned a number of storms from Iowa to Texas today (many of which were severe). The GOES-16 mesoscale sectors were providing rapid-scan service to forecasters in the middle of country, providing 1-minute updates of satellite imagery.

In Texas, the cold front is clearly delineated between clear sky to its west and low clouds to its east, in the warm/moist sector. The probabilities of lighting from LightningCast increased rather quickly from <10% to >75% in many regions, prior to the first detection of GLM flashes (Figure 1). Elevated probabilities of lightning were observed from 15 to 35 minutes prior to lightning initiation for most of these storm cells.

Figure 1: GOES-16 mesoscale sector with Day-Cloud-Convection RGB from ABI (background), GOES-16 GLM flash-extent density (blue-to-orange pixels), and LightningCast probabilities of lightning in the next 60 min (blue=10%; cyan=25%; green=50%; magenta=75%).

Further north, along the Kansas / Missouri border, LightningCast accurately highlighted the line of lightning initiation forced by the cold front (Figure 2). Along this part of the front, there is good evidence that the model’s contours of probability are leading the convective regions, anticipating the prevailing motion. While LightningCast currently only uses a single time of data to make predictions, it seems to have learned (to some extent) the motion of storms from patterns in single images of reflectance and brightness temperature data.

LightningCast will be evaluated by forecasters at the 2023 Hazardous Weather Testbed. Forecaster feedback is important to help direct research-and-development and potential transition-to-operations efforts.

Figure 2: GOES-16 5-min sector with Day-Cloud-Convection RGB from ABI (background), GOES-16 GLM flash-extent density (blue-to-orange pixels), and LightningCast probabilities of lightning in the next 60 min (blue=10%; cyan=25%; green=50%; magenta=75%).

View only this post Read Less