This website works best with a newer web browser such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Microsoft Edge. Internet Explorer is not supported by this website.

Satellite Images of the Sun (on April 8th)

There are several satellites that routinely image the Sun, to support Space Weather. Due to the recent total solar eclipse, there has been much interest in the Sun. SUVIThe GOES-R series also has a number of space weather instruments, including the SUVI (Solar UV Imager). The above images are via the UW/SSEC ingest... Read More

There are several satellites that routinely image the Sun, to support Space Weather. Due to the recent total solar eclipse, there has been much interest in the Sun.

SUVI

The GOES-R series also has a number of space weather instruments, including the SUVI (Solar UV Imager).

GOES-16 SUVI images (He 303) on April 8, 2024.
GOES-16 SUVI images (Fe 171) on April 8, 2024. (Click to Play)

The above images are via the UW/SSEC ingest of NOAA’s GOES-16 SUVI data via the GOES Re-Broadcast (GRB).

SDO

Images from NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO).

Some of the spectral bands on the SDO on April 8, 2024. (Click to Play)

A similar loop, including RGB composites. “Courtesy of NASA/SDO and the AIA, EVE, and HMI science teams.” More SDO images.

LASCO

The Large Angle and Spectrometric COronagraph (LASCO) is on instrument on the joint NASA/ESA SOHO (Solar and Heliospheric Observatory) spacecraft.

LASCO C2 image from April 8, 2024 at 19 UTC.

“Courtesy of SOHO/LASCO consortium. SOHO is a project of international cooperation between ESA and NASA.” This image was obtained here.

GOES-U will fly a compact coronagraph.

H/T

Thanks to many for this post, including Rick Kohrs (UW/SSEC) and Dr. Ryan French. T. Schmit works for NOAA/NESDIS/STAR and is stationed in Madison, WI.

View only this post Read Less

Great Lakes on Earth Day 2024

NOAA-20 overflew the Great Lakes early on 22 April 2024 (Earth Day) and the lack of cloud cover (except over northeastern Lake Superior) allowed a determination of Lake Surface Temperatures over most of the Great Lakes. As is usually the case, Lake Erie is the warmest lake, with temperatures near... Read More

NOAA-20 Day Night Band visible imagery (0.7) and Derived ACSPO Lake Surface Temperatures, 0756 UTC on 22 April 2024 (Click to enlarge)

NOAA-20 overflew the Great Lakes early on 22 April 2024 (Earth Day) and the lack of cloud cover (except over northeastern Lake Superior) allowed a determination of Lake Surface Temperatures over most of the Great Lakes. As is usually the case, Lake Erie is the warmest lake, with temperatures near 50oF over the western part of the lake (values are closer to 41-42oF just north of Erie PA). How might Erie’s temperatures change in the near future? That’s estimated at this link from GLERL. Temperatures over Erie are warmer than normal — but not so warm as during April of 2012 — as shown here; values for other Great Lakes are here. Temperatures are also near 50oF are in Saginaw Bay, and along the south shore of Lake Michigan. Most of northern Lake Michigan, and all of Lake Huron, have temperatures near 40oF, and Lake Superior shows temperatures in the mid-30s.


AWIPS-ready JPSS Tiles are created from data downloaded at the Direct Broadcast antenna at CIMSS (processed by CSPP software) and are available from an LDM feed at CIMSS. Data are also available as imagery at this ftp site, and here.

View only this post Read Less

PHS model output for severe weather over Missouri and Illinois on 18 April

The Storm Prediction Center storm reports for 18 April, below, show severe weather clustered over Missouri and Illinois within the 2000 UTC Enhanced Risk polygon for that day. SPC’s Mesoscale Discussions Numbers 486 — at 2148 UTC — and 488 — at 2312 UTC — discussed these storms. How did the Fusion modeling system, i.e., a... Read More

The Storm Prediction Center storm reports for 18 April, below, show severe weather clustered over Missouri and Illinois within the 2000 UTC Enhanced Risk polygon for that day. SPC’s Mesoscale Discussions Numbers 486 — at 2148 UTC — and 488 — at 2312 UTC — discussed these storms. How did the Fusion modeling system, i.e., a modeling system that includes assimilated data that has been modified by the inclusion of thermodynamic observations from Polar-Orbiting satellites, perform on this day?

SPC Storm Reports from 18 April 2024 plotted on top of the 2000 UTC Convective Outlook (Click to enlarge)

PHS model output at the website includes 4-km WRF output modified by Polar Hyperspectral Sounding input during a 3-h assimilation cycle and 3-km HRRR data that does not include any direct influence from moisture information from the Polar Hyperspectral Soundings. Consider the Surface Analysis toggle below; the forecast office in St Louis is highlighted — that CWA mapping is from here. There are several differences between these two model simulations. There are stronger northerly surface winds to the west of the convection. The character of the convection is also different: in the WRF simulation with PHS thermodynamics, convection shows up as discrete supercellular-like features vs. the less intense convection spread over a region in the HRRR model without PHS information.

5-h Forecast output from a 3-km HRRR model (without PHS input) and a 4-km WRF model (with PHS input). Both models initialized at 1800 UTC on 18 April 2024 (click to enlarge) The cyan circle highlights the St Louis Forecast Office (WFO LSX)

Differences, especially wind differences, at 700 h-Pa are obvious in the slider shown below. There are much stronger 700-hPa winds within the area of convection in the simulation that benefits from the extra thermodynamic information delivered by Polar Hyperspectral Soundings (PHS model data with WRF, in contrast to HRRR without).

The stronger 700-mb winds are reflected the low-level Bulk Wind Shear, the low-level Helicity and the Significant Hail parameter as shown in individual toggles below. All tell the same story: inclusion of Polar Hyperspectral Sounding data into the model is leading to a simulation that more accurately includes the development of supercellular storms that can drop hail or tornadoes, and the 5-h forecast shows this development close to regions where severe weather was observed.

5-h forecast of 0-1 km shear from the 4-km WRF with PHS data and from the 3-km HRRR without PHS data (Click to enlarge)
5-h forecast of Helicity from the 4-km WRF with PHS data and from the 3-km HRRR without PHS data (Click to enlarge)
5-h forecast of Significant Hail Parameter from the 4-km WRF with PHS data and from the 3-km HRRR without PHS data (Click to enlarge)

PHS model data are being demonstrated this year at the Hazardous Weather Testbed held in May/June at SPC.

View only this post Read Less

Severe thunderstorms produce large hail and damaging winds in parts of North Carolina and South Carolina

1-minute Mesoscale Domain Sector GOES-16 (GOES-East) images showed clusters of severe thunderstorms that developed in the vicinity of the North Carolina / South Carolina border on 20 April 2024 — “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) and “Clean” Infrared Window (10.3 µm) images (above) included time-matched plots of preliminary/filtered SPC Storm Reports for these thunderstorms, which produced wind gusts as high... Read More

1-minute GOES-16 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm, top) and “Clean” Infrared Window (10.3 µm, bottom) images with time-matched (+/- 3 minutes) SPC Storm Report plots, from 1915 UTC to 2137 UTC on 20 April [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

1-minute Mesoscale Domain Sector GOES-16 (GOES-East) images showed clusters of severe thunderstorms that developed in the vicinity of the North Carolina / South Carolina border on 20 April 2024 — “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) and “Clean” Infrared Window (10.3 µm) images (above) included time-matched plots of preliminary/filtered SPC Storm Reports for these thunderstorms, which produced wind gusts as high as 90 mph and hail as large as 4.00 inches in South Carolina, and hail that was possibly as large as 4.50 inches in diameter in Lumberton, North Carolina (KLBT) at or around 2122 UTC (a toggle between the GOES-16 Visible and Infrared images at 2122 UTC is shown below, which portrayed a distinct overshooting top in the vicinity of that hail report). The coldest cloud-top 10.3 µm infrared  brightness temperatures were around -70ºC (darker black enhancement) — according to a plot of 1200 UTC Greensboro NC rawinsonde data, that -70ºC cloud-top infrared brightness temperature represented a small overshoot of the local tropopause (which was -65.5ºC at 185 hPa or 12.5 km).

GOES-16 Visible and Infrared images at 2122 UTC [click to enlarge]

 

1-minute GOES-16 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) images with an overlay of the CAPE and Lifted Index derived stability indices, from 1900-2300 UTC on 20 April [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

1-minute GOES-16 Visible images combined with CAPE and Lifted Index Derived Stability Indices in cloud-free skies (above) indicated that an axis of instability existed in the general vicinity of a diffuse quasi-stationary frontal boundary, which was situated south of the developing thunderstorms. However, these severe thunderstorms were developing within a corridor of enhanced moisture that was located just north of the front, as seen in GOES-16 Visible images combined with the Total Precipitable Water derived product (below).

1-minute GOES-16 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) images with an overlay of the Total Precipitable Water derived product, from 1900-2300 UTC on 20 April [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

1-minute GOES-16 Visible images with/without an overlay of GLM Flash Extent Density (below) showed the lightning activity associated with these thunderstorms, which included periodic brief lightning jumps.

1-minute GOES-16 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) images with/without an overlay of GLM Flash Extent Density, from 1820-2300 UTC on 20 April [click to play animated GIF | MP4]

View only this post Read Less