Short-term predictions of convective development

March 17th, 2009

The 10 February 2009 tornado outbreak was noteworthy for the production of strong supercells in and around metropolitan Oklahoma City at a time of year when climatology argues against their presence. This tornado outbreak has been discussed previously on this blog, which includes visible and infrared satellite animations as well as TPW, LI and ozone products from the GOES sounder. The present blog entry discusses a sequence of multi-layer stability observations and short-range forecasts obtained from GOES sounder precipitable water products.

Convective outlooks issued by the Storm Prediction Center had the highest probability of severe weather in southeast Oklahoma. Storm reports, however, show a region of less concentrated severe weather within the region of moderate risk (centered near Texarkana, AR) as well as a a concentrated region of severe weather outside the initial moderate risk area (but still within the slight risk region). A 1630z update did expand the area of moderate risk to the northwest, to include the region where supercells and tornadoes occurred.

Information from the GOES-12 sounder Water Vapor channels helps to define the regions most susceptible to convection on that day, as shown in the loop above. This technique initializes a trajectory model with RUC winds and with precipitable water at different levels as retrieved from the GOES-12 sounder. The retrieval uses the 3 water vapor channels, channels 10 (7.4 microns), 11 (7.0 microns) and 12 (6.5 microns). (The shorter wavelength energy typically is emitted from higher in the atmosphere. GOES-12 weighting functions from Channel 10 typically peak around 600 or 700 mb; weighting functions from Channel 12 peak closer to 400 mb. (The exact level is, of course, a function of the airmass and the satellite viewing angle)). These three channels can help to define the distribution of water vapor in the atmosphere at different levels: the output of the retrieval that combines the brightness temperatures and initial guess soundings is precipitable water (mm) at different levels. Such a multi-layer description of the atmospheric water vapor is not possible with the single water vapor channel on the GOES imager; the multiple channels of the GOES sounder are required.

This model can predict areas of destabilization (convective potential) if “low” level moisture moves underneath “upper” level drying. The fields are presented as moisture change with height. If a region shows the moisture change with height increasing with time, then that region is becoming more convectively unstable. In the case shown above, observations are shown for the 6 hours before the ‘initial’ model time (17 UTC), and then output from the model — that is, short-range predictions (nearcasts) from a model using RUC winds and GOES Sounder PWs — is shown. Maximum destabilization is clearly indicated over central Oklahoma where supercells and tornadoes occurred. Note that for the 10 February case, the region of most interest aligns favorably with the line of convective development that initiated over central TX and central OK and produced supercell thunderstorms in the metro Oklahoma City area. In addition, the peak instability — as defined by the greatest decrease in precipitable water with height — occurs around 2100 UTC. Here is a radar image from that time. The predictions started from data at 1400 UTC, 1500 UTC, 1600 UTC, 1700 UTC (as above), 1800 UTC, 1900 UTC, 2000 UTC, 2100 UTC and 2200 UTC all show similar patterns. Note also that southeastern OK, also within the moderate risk, is diagnosed with somewhat less destabilization using this technique.

A second technique for discerning convective potential from satellite is discussed here.

Undular bore in Florida

March 17th, 2009
GOES-13 visible images

GOES-13 visible images

GOES-13 visible imagery (above) showed  an undular bore that was propagating southward across the Florida peninsula  on 17 March 2009. This bore feature appeared to play a role in the initiation of a line of convective clouds that developed over central and southern Florida after about 15 UTC (10am local time). The resulting precipitation was farily light, however, with rainfall amounts of 0.10 inch or less.

A MODIS true color image (below, displayed using Google Earth) revealed that there were at least 10 individual cloud bands (also known as “solitons”) associated with this undular bore. The fact that this particular bore feature appeared to help with convective initiation might seem counter-intuitive, given that the propagation of bores requires a stable layer to propagate — but the convection may have fired along the leading edge of the cold frontal boundary (which was likely out ahead of the undular bore).

MODIS true color image

MODIS true color image (viewed using Google Earth)

The photo below shows the leading edge of the undular bore clouds (taken just south of Melbourne, along the coast, around 9:00 am local time).

Photograph of bore clouds (courtesy of , UW-Madison)

Photograph of bore clouds (courtesy of Dan Hartung (UW-Madison/AOS student)

Stratospheric intrusion vorticies

March 16th, 2009
GOES-11 / GOES-12 / GOES-13 waver vapor images

GOES-11 / GOES-12 / GOES-13 waver vapor images

Water vapor imagery from the GOES-11, GOES-12, and GOES-13 satellites (above) showed the spin-up of a well-defined “stratospheric intrusion vortex” over western Kansas on 14 March 2009. The imagery from each of those 3 satellites is displayed in its native projection, which helps to demonstrate the difference that satellite viewing angle has on the depiction of features on the water vapor imagery. Also demonstrated is the fact that imagery from GOES-13 was available through the GOES-11 and GOES-12 “Spring eclipse” periods (when the geostationary satellites are in the Earth’s shadow, and their solar panels cannot generate the power necessary to operate the instruments) — larger batteries on-board the GOES-13 satellite allows operation through the Spring and Fall eclipse periods.

A larger-scale view of AWIPS GOES-12 water vapor imagery (below) shows that there was a string of these vorticies forming during the 14-15 March time period, with a pair of smaller, weaker features seen in Iowa. While these stratospheric intrusion vorticies are seen on water vapor imagery from time to time, they usually do not produce much in the way of “sensible weather” (clouds or precipitation). However, they do seem to be capable of producing areas of mid-tropospheric turbulence, which can be a hazard for aviation. Pilot reports of turbulence (below) did show that there were a few scattered reports of light to moderate turbulence in the general vicinity of the vorticies.

GOES-12 water vapor images + pilot reports of turbulence

GOES-12 water vapor images + pilot reports of turbulence

The GOES-12 sounder Total Column Ozone derived product (below) confirms that these water vapor features were indeed stratospheric intrusion vorticies — the warmer/drier water vapor vortex features  corresponded to ozone values in the 375-400 Dobson Unit range (brighter green to red color enhancement).

GOES sounder Total Column Ozone derived product

GOES sounder Total Column Ozone derived product

The largest and most well-defined vortex (which initially formed over western Kansas on 14 March) was fairly long-lived, and was still evident on water vapor imagery over Illinois 48 hours later on 16 March. Surprisingly, this vortex also spawned some small pockets of convection that even produced a handful of cloud to ground lightning strikes (below).

GOES-12 water vapor images + lightnining strikes

GOES-12 water vapor images + lightnining strikes

A GOES-12 water vapor image with an overlay of NAM40 model fields of 500 hPa height (cyan contours) and PV1.5 pressure (red contours) indicated that there was a Potential Vorticity (PV) anomaly associated with the stratospheric intrusion vortex — the height of the “dynamic tropopause” (taken to be the pressure of the PV1.5 surface) was brought downward to near the 500 hPa pressure level over parts of northern Missouri and central Illinois.

GOES-12 water vapor image (with location of NAM40 cross section line)

GOES-12 water vapor image (with location of NAM40 cross section line)

An AWIPS cross section of the NAM40 model fields (below) allows another way to visualize the lowering of the dynamic tropopause with this PV anomaly (PV is depicted as the multi-colored image feature on the cross section).

Cross section of NAM40 model fields

West-to-east cross section of NAM40 model fields