Signatures of the Alaska Range in GOES-17 Water Vapor imagery
![GOES-17 Low-level (7.3 µm), Mid-level (6.9 µm) and Upper-level (6.2 µm) Water Vapor images, with topography [click to play animation | MP4]](https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2019/02/ak_wv10-20190228_181538.png)
GOES-17 Low-level (7.3 µm), Mid-level (6.9 µm) and Upper-level (6.2 µm) Water Vapor images, with topography [click to play animation | MP4]
Plots of GOES-17 Water Vapor weighting functions, calculated using 12 UTC rawinsonde data from Anchorage, are shown below. Even with a very large satellite viewing angle (or zenith angle) of 70.1 degrees — which would tend to shift the Water Vapor weighting functions to higher altitudes — the presence of dry air within the entire mid-upper troposphere brought the weighting function peaks downward to pressure levels corresponding to those of the higher elevations of the Alaska Range.
![GOES-17 Water Vapor weighting functions, calculated using 12 UTC rawinsonde data from Anchorage [click to enlarge]](https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2019/02/190228_12utc_panc_wv_wf.png)
GOES-17 Water Vapor weighting functions, calculated using 12 UTC rawinsonde data from Anchorage [click to enlarge]
![GOES-17 "Red" Visible (0.64 µm) images [click to play animation | MP4]](https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2019/02/ak_vis-20190228_203038.png)
GOES-17 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) images [click to play animation | MP4]
GOES-17 “Red” Visible (0.64 µm) images [click to play animation | MP4]
===== 01 March Update =====
![GOES-17 Low-level (7.3 µm), Mid-level (6.9 µm) and Upper-level (6.2 µm) Water Vapor images, with topography [click to play animation | MP4]](https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2019/03/ak_wv9-20190301_180038.png)
GOES-17 Low-level (7.3 µm), Mid-level (6.9 µm) and Upper-level (6.2 µm) Water Vapor images, with topography [click to play animation | MP4]
However, in this case the Water Vapor weighting functions derived using rawinsonde data from nearby Anchorage were not representative of the pocket of dry air farther east over the mountains. An increase in the moisture profile — especially within the mid/upper troposphere — shifted the weighting functions to higher altitudes, due absorption and re-emission by that higher-altitude (and colder) moisture. Note how the weighting function contributions centered around the 300 hPa pressure level increased during the 24 hours from 12 UTC on 28 February to 12 UTC on 01 March, while the relative contributions decreased within the 500-700 layer (below).
![GOES-17 Water Vapor weighting functions, calculated using rawinsonde data from Anchorage on 28 February (12 UTC) and 01 March (00 and 12 UTC) [click to enllarge]](https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2019/03/190228_190301_panc_wv_wf_anim.gif)
GOES-17 Water Vapor weighting functions, calculated using rawinsonde data from Anchorage on 28 February (12 UTC) and 01 March (00 and 12 UTC) [click to enllarge]
![GOES-17 Upper-level Water Vapor (6.2 µm) image at 2045 UTC, with NUCAPS sounding points at 2049 UTC plotted in green [click to enlarge]](https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2019/03/ak_wv8_nucaps-20190301_204538_M_D.png)
GOES-17 Upper-level Water Vapor (6.2 µm) image at 2045 UTC, with NUCAPS sounding points plotted in green [click to enlarge]