{"id":9307,"date":"2011-12-06T18:00:26","date_gmt":"2011-12-06T18:00:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/?p=9307"},"modified":"2015-06-19T00:36:02","modified_gmt":"2015-06-19T00:36:02","slug":"goes-15-replaces-goes-11-as-the-operational-goes-west-satellite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/9307","title":{"rendered":"GOES-15 replaces GOES-11 as the operational GOES-West satellite"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>At 15:46 UTC on <strong><a title=\"06 December 2011 daily weather map\" href=\"http:\/\/www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov\/dailywxmap\/index_20111206.html\">06 December 2011<\/a><\/strong>, GOES-15 replaced GOES-11 as the operational GOES-West satellite. GOES-11 <em>(launched in 2000, and operational since 2006)<\/em> was one of the older GOES-I\/J\/K\/L\/M series of satellites (GOES-8\/9\/10\/11\/12), while GOES-15 <em>(launched in 2010; <strong><a title=\"GOES-15 Post Launch Test\" href=\"http:\/\/rammb.cira.colostate.edu\/projects\/goes-p\/\">Post Launch Test<\/a><\/strong>)<\/em> is one of the newer GOES-N\/O\/P series of satellites (GOES-13\/14\/15) &#8212; so there are some important differences that users of the new GOES-15 imagery should be aware of:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Improved water vapor channel (Imager channel 3)<\/li>\n<li>Slightly different visible channel (Imager chanel 1)<\/li>\n<li>13.3 \u00c2\u00b5m IR (Imager channel 6) replaces the 12.0 \u00b5m\u00a0 IR (Imager channel 5)<\/li>\n<li>Improved Image Navigation and Registration (INR)<\/li>\n<li>Shorter image outages during Spring and Fall season &#8220;eclipse periods&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>Less noise on many of the Sounder channels<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/12\/111206_goes_west_awips_wv_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-11 vs GOES-15 Imager water vapor channel data as the source for GOES-West\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/12\/111206_goes_west_awips_wv_anim.gif\" alt=\"GOES-11 vs GOES-15 Imager water vapor channel data as the source for GOES-West\" width=\"480\" height=\"459\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-11 vs GOES-15 Imager water vapor channel data as the source for GOES-West<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The improvement made to the GOES-15 Imager instrument water vapor channel is likely the most important change that operational users will notice. In the sequence of AWIPS images above, the first 3 images are using the 8-km resolution GOES-11 6.7 \u00b5m channel as the source for GOES-West water vapor imagery, while the final 3 images use the 4-km resolution GOES-15 6.5 \u00b5m channel. Note the change to slightly warmer\/drier water vapor brightness temperatures <em>(brighter yellow color enhancement)<\/em> after the changeover to GOES-15 &#8212; this in part due to the fact that the <strong><a title=\"Water vapor channel Spectral Response Function plots\" href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/goes12_blog\/watvapg8g12gms5met7.gif\">spectral response function<\/a><\/strong> of the 4-km resolution water vapor channel on GOES-12 and beyond is much wider than that of the 8-km resolution water vapor channel on GOES-8 through GOES-11. In addition, notice that the north-south &#8220;seam&#8221; joining the GOES-West and GOES-East water vapor channel images disappears, since the characteristics of the water vapor channels are now identical on those two satellites.<\/p>\n<p>In the sequence of AWIPS images below, the first 2 images are using the GOES-11 Sounder instrument 6.5 \u00b5m channel as the source for GOES-West water vapor imagery, while the final 2 images use the GOES-15 Sounder 6.5 \u00b5m channel. Note the improvement in noise seen in the Sounder instrument water vapor images after the changeover to GOES-15. Since the 3 GOES Sounder water vapor channels are a component of the GOES Sounder Total Precipitable Water derived product imagery, the quality of that product should also improve.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/12\/111206_goes_west_wv_sounder_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-11 vs GOES-15 Sounder 6.5 \u00c2\u00b5m water vapor channel data as the source for GOES-West\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/12\/111206_goes_west_wv_sounder_anim.gif\" alt=\"GOES-11 vs GOES-15 Sounder 6.5 \u00b5m water vapor channel data as the source for GOES-West\" width=\"480\" height=\"459\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-11 vs GOES-15 Sounder 6.5 \u00b5m water vapor channel data as the source for GOES-West<\/p><\/div>\n<p>In terms of the visible imagery, a comparison using GOES-11 <em>(the first 3 images)<\/em> vs GOES-15 <em>(the final set of 3 images)<\/em> Imager visible channel data is seen below (during a test on 29 November). Immediately obvious is the fact that the GOES-15 visible channel imagery appears &#8220;brighter&#8221; than the GOES-11 visible channel imagery &#8212; this is due to the fact that the performance of the GOES visible detectors degrades over time. The 0.63 \u00b5m visible channel on GOES-15 is also slightly different than the 0.65 \u00b5m visible channel on GOES-11, as is discussed in the &#8220;<strong><a title=\"GOES-13 is now the operational GOES-East satellite\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/5116\">GOES-13 is now the operational GOES-East satellite<\/a><\/strong>&#8221; blog post. GOES-15 is similar to GOES-13, since it is part of the <strong><a title=\"GOES-N\/O\/P series (PDF)\" href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CCEQFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgoes.gsfc.nasa.gov%2Ftext%2Fbrochure%2FGOES_NOP_web.pdf&amp;ei=v0jVTsTCB6j3sQKItOCKDw&amp;usg=AFQjCNFZUYl4bKTAj4GT-Endjn1857tt1A&amp;sig2=U54viGDxg2Tttf3MlwQazQ\">GOES-N\/O\/P<\/a><\/strong> series of spacecraft.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/11\/111129_g11_g15_goes_west_awips_test_vis_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Using GOES-11 vs GOES-15 as the source for GOES-West visible channel images\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/11\/111129_g11_g15_goes_west_awips_test_vis_anim.gif\" alt=\"Using GOES-11 vs GOES-15 as the source for GOES-West visible channel images\" width=\"480\" height=\"459\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Using GOES-11 vs GOES-15 as the source for GOES-West visible channel images<\/p><\/div>\n<p>One of the benefits of GOES-15 is improved Image Navigation and Registration (INR), which leads to less image-to-image &#8220;wobble&#8221; when viewing an animation. The improved GOES-15 INR is quite evident when compared to GOES-11 for this blowing dust case on 27 November <strong><em>(below; click image to play animation)<\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/11\/111127_g11_g15_vis_baja_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" \" title=\"GOES-11 0.65 \u00b5m and GOES-15 0.63 \u00b5m visible images (click image to play animation)\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/11\/111127_G11_G15_VIS_BAJA_20.GIF\" alt=\"GOES-11 0.65 \u00b5m and GOES-15 0.63 \u00b5m visible images (click image to play animation)\" width=\"480\" height=\"360\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-11 0.65 \u00b5m and GOES-15 0.63 \u00b5m visible images (click image to play animation)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>A comparison of the GOES-15 0.63 \u00b5m visible channel, the 10.7 \u00b5m &#8220;IR window&#8221; channel, and the 13.3 \u00b5m &#8220;CO2 absorption&#8221; IR channel <strong><em>(below)<\/em><\/strong> shows that high cloud features will show up with more clarity on the 13.3 \u00b5m images &#8212; by examining the <strong><a title=\"GOES weighting function plots\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/11\/111129_goes_ch04_06_wf_slc.jpg\">weighting function<\/a><\/strong> of the 13.3 \u00b5m IR channel, it can be seen that this CO2 absorption channel samples radiation from a much deeper, much higher altitude than the standard 10.7 \u00b5m IR window channel.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/11\/111123_g15_ch010406_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-15 0.63 \u00b5m visible channel, 10.7 \u00b5m IR channel, and 13.3 \u00b5m IR channel images\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/11\/111123_g15_ch010406_anim.gif\" alt=\"GOES-15 0.63 \u00b5m visible channel, 10.7 \u00b5m IR channel, and 13.3 \u00b5m IR channel images\" width=\"480\" height=\"400\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-15 0.63 \u00b5m visible channel, 10.7 \u00b5m IR channel, and 13.3 \u00b5m IR channel images<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The 13.3 \u00b5m &#8220;CO2 absorption&#8221; IR channel is also used for the creation of derived products such as Cloud Top Pressure. An example of a combined GOES-15 (GOES-West) + GOES-13 (GOES-East) Cloud Top Pressure product is shown below <em>(courtesy of Tony Schreiner, CIMSS)<\/em>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/12\/111208_g15_g13_cloud_top_pressure.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-15 + GOES-13 Cloud Top Pressure product\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/12\/111208_g15_g13_cloud_top_pressure.gif\" alt=\"GOES-15 + GOES-13 Cloud Top Pressure product\" width=\"480\" height=\"360\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-15 + GOES-13 Cloud Top Pressure product<\/p><\/div>\n<p>An example of the value of having larger batteries onboard the GOES-13\/14\/15 spacecraft during eclipse periods can be seen below, as Hurricane Ike was making landfall along the Texas coast in September of 2008. During the approximately 3 hour image outage from GOES-12 during the eclipse period <em>(when the satellite was in the Earth&#8217;s shadow, and the solar panels could not generate the power necessary to operate the GOES imager and GOES sounder instrument packages),<\/em> GOES-13 IR images continued to be available &#8212; and these GOES-13 images showed a strong spiral band that was in the process of intensifying and moving inland along the far northeastern Texas and far southwestern Louisiana coastlines.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2008\/09\/080913_g12_g13_ir_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-12 vs GOES-13 IR images (Hurricane Ike making landfall)\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2008\/09\/080913_g12_g13_ir_anim.gif\" alt=\"GOES-12 vs GOES-13 IR images (Hurricane Ike making landfall)\" width=\"480\" height=\"360\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-12 vs GOES-13 IR images (Hurricane Ike making landfall)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Additional information can be found on the VISIT training lesson &#8220;<strong><a title=\"\" href=\"http:\/\/rammb.cira.colostate.edu\/training\/visit\/training_sessions\/goes-15_becomes_goes-west\/\">GOES-15 Becomes GOES-West<\/a><\/strong>&#8220;.<\/p>\n<p><strong>HISTORICAL NOTE:<\/strong> GOES-15 became GOES-West on the 45th anniversary of the launch of <strong><a title=\"Advanced Technology Satellites (ATS)\" href=\"http:\/\/library.ssec.wisc.edu\/spinscan\/about.php\">ATS-1<\/a><\/strong> on 06 December 1966. ATS-1 was the first meteorological satellite to provide geostationary images &#8212; an example of an early ATS-1 visible image is seen below, and QuickTime movies are available which show <strong><a title=\"QuickTime movies of early ATS-1 satellite images\" href=\"http:\/\/library.ssec.wisc.edu\/SuomiWebsite\/SuomiImages\/ATS_Movies\/quicktime\/TSL_Film_14.mov\">animations of some of the early ATS-1 images<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/12\/11Dec1966_ATS1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"ATS-1 visible image (11 December 1966)\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/12\/11Dec1966_ATS1.jpg\" alt=\"ATS-1 visible image (11 December 1966)\" width=\"480\" height=\"400\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">ATS-1 visible image (11 December 1966)<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At 15:46 UTC on 06 December 2011, GOES-15 replaced GOES-11 as the operational GOES-West satellite. GOES-11 (launched in 2000, and operational since 2006) was one of the older GOES-I\/J\/K\/L\/M series of satellites (GOES-8\/9\/10\/11\/12), while GOES-15 (launched in 2010; Post Launch Test) is one of the newer GOES-N\/O\/P series of satellites (GOES-13\/14\/15) &#8212; so there are [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,18,11,43,41,47,39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9307","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-goes-sounder","category-goes-11","category-goes-13","category-goes-15","category-historical","category-other-satellites","category-training"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9307","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9307"}],"version-history":[{"count":42,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9307\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18681,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9307\/revisions\/18681"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9307"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9307"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9307"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}