{"id":7706,"date":"2011-03-17T21:08:28","date_gmt":"2011-03-17T21:08:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/?p=7706"},"modified":"2011-03-18T16:38:26","modified_gmt":"2011-03-18T16:38:26","slug":"plume-of-unknown-etiology-moving-over-alaska","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/7706","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Plume of unknown etiology&#8221; moving over Alaska"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/110316_g11_vis_ak_plume_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-11 0.65 \u00c2\u00b5m visible channel images (click image to play animation)\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/110316_G11_VIS_AK_PLUME_13.GIF\" alt=\"GOES-11 0.65 \u00c2\u00b5m visible channel images (click image to play animation)\" width=\"480\" height=\"360\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-11 0.65 \u00c2\u00b5m visible channel images (click image to play animation)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>McIDAS images of GOES-11 0.65 \u00c2\u00b5m visible channel data <em><strong>(above; click image to play animation)<\/strong><\/em> showed an interesting &#8220;dark plume&#8221; feature that was moving in an arc from far northeastern Russia, across the East Siberian Sea and Chukchi Sea, and finally over far northwestern Alaska on <strong>16 March &#8211; 17 March 2011<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>When viewed from a more western angle using MTSAT-2 0.73 \u00c2\u00b5m visible channel images <em><strong>(below; click image to play animation),<\/strong><\/em> the plume feature <em>(which can be seen moving over far northwestern Alaska in the upper right portion of the images)<\/em> also exhibited a darker appearance, similar to that seen on the GOES-11 visible imagery. This darker appearance was due to backward scattering of light from the particles within the plume.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/110316_mtsat_vis_ak_plume_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"MTSAT-2 0.73 \u00c2\u00b5m visible channel images (click image to play animation)\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/110316_MTSAT_VIS_AK_PLUME_07.GIF\" alt=\"MTSAT-2 0.73 \u00c2\u00b5m visible channel images (click image to play animation)\" width=\"480\" height=\"428\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">MTSAT-2 0.73 \u00c2\u00b5m visible channel images (click image to play animation)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>AWIPS images of POES AVHRR 0.86 \u00c2\u00b5m visible channel data <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em> provided  more of a  &#8220;direct view from above&#8221;,\u00c2\u00a0 and revealed that the main body of the plume was basically transparent <em>(allowing details of the sea ice to be seen through the plume)<\/em>.\u00c2\u00a0 However, the plume <em>edges<\/em> appeared to have some vertical structure, being thick enough to cast shadows onto the sea ice below.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/110316-17_poes_avhrr_vis_ak_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"POES AVHRR 0.86 \u00c2\u00b5m visible channel images\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/110316-17_poes_avhrr_vis_ak_anim.gif\" alt=\"POES AVHRR 0.86 \u00c2\u00b5m visible channel images\" width=\"480\" height=\"459\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">POES AVHRR 0.86 \u00c2\u00b5m visible channel images<\/p><\/div>\n<p>It is interesting to note that this plume feature did not exhibit any notable signature on POES AVHRR 12.0 \u00c2\u00b5m IR images <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/110316-17_poes_avhrr_ir_ak_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"POES AVHRR 12.0 \u00c2\u00b5m IR images\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/110316-17_poes_avhrr_ir_ak_anim.gif\" alt=\"POES AVHRR 12.0 \u00c2\u00b5m IR images\" width=\"480\" height=\"459\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">POES AVHRR 12.0 \u00c2\u00b5m IR images<\/p><\/div>\n<p>A series of MODIS true color Red\/Green\/Blue (RGB) images (below; courtesy of the <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.gina.alaska.edu\/\">GINA, University of Alaska<\/a><\/strong>) again showed the transparent nature of the main body of the plume feature, except for the thicker edges which\u00c2\u00a0 were casting shadows.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 489px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/110316-17_modis_truecolor_ak_plume_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"MODIS true color Red\/Green\/Blue (RGB) images (courtesy of University of Alaska, GINA)\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/110316-17_modis_truecolor_ak_plume_anim.gif\" alt=\"MODIS true color Red\/Green\/Blue (RGB) images (courtesy of University of Alaska, GINA)\" width=\"479\" height=\"426\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">MODIS true color Red\/Green\/Blue (RGB) images (courtesy of University of Alaska, GINA)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Could this feature have been an aged volcanic plume that was being transported aloft over the Arctic? AWIPS images of the MODIS Volcanic Ash Mass Loading product <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em> did display a few isolated very small patches exhibiting 1-10 tons per square kilometer of loading at 04:44 UTC on 17 March, but there was no temporal continuity when examining the Ash Mass Loading product before or after this particular time.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 491px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/MODIS_ASH_MASS_20110317_0444.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"MODIS Volcanic Ash Mass Loading product\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/MODIS_ASH_MASS_20110317_0444.png\" alt=\"MODIS Volcanic Ash Mass Loading product\" width=\"481\" height=\"460\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">MODIS Volcanic Ash Mass Loading product<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/MODIS_ASH_HGT_20110317_0444.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Volcanic Ash Height product\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/MODIS_ASH_HGT_20110317_0444.png\" alt=\"Volcanic Ash Height product\" width=\"480\" height=\"459\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Volcanic Ash Height product<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The corresponding MODIS Volcanic Ash Height product <em><strong>(above)<\/strong><\/em> indicated that these features were located at an altitude of 3-4 km, while the MODIS Ash Mass Effective Particle Radius product <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em> showed values in the 3-5 \u00c2\u00b5m range.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/MODIS_ASH_EFFR_20110317_0444.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Volcanic Ash Particle Effective Radius product\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/MODIS_ASH_EFFR_20110317_0444.png\" alt=\"Volcanic Ash Particle Effective Radius product\" width=\"480\" height=\"459\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Volcanic Ash Particle Effective Radius product<\/p><\/div>\n<p>However, rather than an aged volcanic ash plume, a more plausible explanation of the feature seen on satellite imagery is the long-range transport of smoke and pollution from industrial sources in northeastern China. A calculation of 96-hour backward trajectories using the NOAA ARL <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/ready.arl.noaa.gov\/HYSPLIT.php\">HYSPLIT<\/a><\/strong> model <strong><em>(below)<\/em><\/strong> indicated that air parcels arriving at 3 points along the plume at an altitude of 6-km  had originated within the boundary layer over northeastern China on 13 March. MODIS images showing the thick haze over that region can be found on the <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/alg.umbc.edu\/usaq\/archives\/004115.html\">US Air Quality &#8220;Smog Blog&#8221;<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/110317_00z_4_6_8km_traj.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"NOAA ARL HYSPLIT back trajectories arriving at  the 4km, 6km, and 8km altitudes\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2011\/03\/110317_00z_4_6_8km_traj.gif\" title=\"NOAA ARL HYSPLIT back trajectories arriving at  the 4km, 6km, and 8km altitudes\" width=\"480\" height=\"520\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">NOAA ARL HYSPLIT back trajectories arriving at  the 4km, 6km, and 8km altitudes<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>McIDAS images of GOES-11 0.65 \u00c2\u00b5m visible channel data (above; click image to play animation) showed an interesting &#8220;dark plume&#8221; feature that was moving in an arc from far northeastern Russia, across the East Siberian Sea and Chukchi Sea, and finally over far northwestern Alaska on 16 March &#8211; 17 March 2011. When viewed from [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[37,22,18,12,20,26,45,38],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7706","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-arctic","category-avhrr","category-goes-11","category-modis","category-mtsat","category-poes","category-redgreenblue-rgb-images","category-what-the-heck-is-this"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7706","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7706"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7706\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7723,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7706\/revisions\/7723"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7706"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7706"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7706"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}