{"id":6213,"date":"2010-07-23T23:00:35","date_gmt":"2010-07-23T23:00:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/?p=6213"},"modified":"2018-07-24T15:27:26","modified_gmt":"2018-07-24T15:27:26","slug":"large-hail-in-south-dakota","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/6213","title":{"rendered":"Largest US hailstone on record in central South Dakota"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2010\/07\/100723_g13_g15_ir4_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-13 (top) and GOES-15 (bottom) 10.7 \u00c2\u00b5m IR images\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2010\/07\/100723_g13_g15_ir4_anim.gif\" alt=\"GOES-13 (top) and GOES-15 (bottom) 10.7 \u00c2\u00b5m IR images\" width=\"480\" height=\"360\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-13 (top) and GOES-15 (bottom) 10.7 \u00b5m IR images<\/p><\/div>\n<p>McIDAS images of GOES-13 and GOES-15 10.7 \u00b5m IR images <em><strong>(above)<\/strong><\/em> showed the development of severe thunderstorms that produced very large hail, tornadoes, and damaging surface winds (<a title=\"SPC storm reports (23 July 2010)\" href=\"http:\/\/www.spc.noaa.gov\/climo\/reports\/100723_rpts.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>SPC storm reports<\/strong><\/a>) in central South Dakota on <a title=\"23 July 2010 daily weather map\" href=\"http:\/\/www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov\/dailywxmap\/index_20100723.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>23 July 2010<\/strong><\/a>. This storm produced the largest US hailstone on record: 8 inch diameter, 18.6 inch circumference, 1.9375 pound weight &#8212; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.weather.gov\/abr\/vivianhailstone\"><strong>photos<\/strong><\/a> of the record-setting largest hailstone were taken by staff from the <a title=\"NWS forecast office Aberdeen SD\" href=\"http:\/\/www.crh.noaa.gov\/abr\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Aberdeen, South Dakota NWS forecast office<\/strong><\/a>. The coldest cloud top IR brightness temperatures were <strong>-71\u00ba C<\/strong> <em>(darker black color enhancement)<\/em> at 23:25 and 23:32 UTC. Since the GOES-13 satellite had been placed into Rapid Scan Operations (RSO), images were available as often as every 5-10 minutes <em>(as opposed to every 15 minutes via the routine image scan schedule on GOES-15)<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>The corresponding GOES-13 and GOES-15 0.63 \u00b5m visible channel images <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em> displayed a well-defined storm top anvil with distinct overshooting tops (GOES-13 visible images only: <a title=\"GOES-13 visible images (Animated GIF)\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2010\/07\/100723_g13_vis_rso_anim.gif\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Animated GIF<\/strong><\/a>). Prior to convective development, the appearance of the quasi-stationary low-level parallel cloud bands suggests that there was strong warm air advection into the region from the southwest (<a title=\"HPC surface forecast\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2010\/07\/100723_surface_forecast.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>HPC surface forecast<\/strong><\/a>).<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2010\/07\/100723_g13_g15_vis_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-13 (top) and GOES-15 (bottom) 0.63 \u00c2\u00b5m visible images\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2010\/07\/100723_g13_g15_vis_anim.gif\" alt=\"GOES-13 (top) and GOES-15 (bottom) 0.63 \u00c2\u00b5m visible images\" width=\"480\" height=\"360\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-13 (top) and GOES-15 (bottom) 0.63 \u00b5m visible images<\/p><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>=================================================<\/strong><\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2010\/07\/100723_goes_sounder_tpw_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" \" title=\"GOES-13 Sounder Total Precipitable Water (TPW) product\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2010\/07\/100723_goes_sounder_tpw_anim.gif\" alt=\"GOES-13 Sounder Total Precipitable Water (TPW) product\" width=\"480\" height=\"453\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-13 Sounder Total Precipitable Water (TPW) product<\/p><\/div>\n<p>AWIPS images of the GOES-13 Sounder Total Precipitable Water <em><strong>(above)<\/strong><\/em> and Lifted Index <em><strong>(below) <\/strong><\/em>depicted a broad axis of moisture and instability that extended northwestward into central South Dakota on that day.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2010\/07\/100723_goes_sounder_li_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-13 Sounder Lifted Index (LI) product\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2010\/07\/100723_goes_sounder_li_anim.gif\" alt=\"GOES-13 Sounder Lifted Index (LI) product\" width=\"480\" height=\"453\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-13 Sounder Lifted Index (LI) product<\/p><\/div>\n<p>A comparison of the 1-km resolution GOES-13 0.63 \u00b5m visible image and the 4-km resolution GOES-13 10.7 \u00b5m IR image at 22:45 UTC <em>(around the time of a report of 85 mph surface winds)<\/em> is seen below. The apparent offset between the location of the overshooting top and the location of the surface wind gust is due in part to <a title=\"parallax error\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/217\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>parallax error<\/strong><\/a> <em>(a result of the large viewing angle from the <a title=\"GOES-13\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oso.noaa.gov\/goesstatus\/spacecraftStatusSummary.asp?spacecraft=13\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>GOES-13 satellite<\/strong><\/a>, which is positioned over the Equator at 75\u00ba West longitude)<\/em>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2010\/07\/100723_g13_vis_ir4_G85_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-13 visible and IR images at 22:45 UTC (near the time of a 85 mph wind gust)\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2010\/07\/100723_g13_vis_ir4_G85_anim.gif\" alt=\"GOES-13 visible and IR images at 22:45 UTC (near the time of a 85 mph wind gust)\" width=\"480\" height=\"359\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-13 visible and IR images at 22:45 UTC (near the time of a 85 mph wind gust)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>A comparison of the 1-km resolution 0.63 \u00b5m GOES-13 visible image and the 4-km resolution 10.7 \u00b5m IR image at 23:10 UTC<em> (around the time of a report of &#8220;softball size&#8221; 4.25 inch diameter hail)<\/em> is shown below.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2010\/07\/100723_g13_vis_ir4_A425_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-13 visible and IR images at 23:10 UTC (near the time of 4.25 inch diameter hail)\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2010\/07\/100723_g13_vis_ir4_A425_anim.gif\" alt=\"GOES-13 visible and IR images at 23:10 UTC (near the time of 4.25 inch diameter hail)\" width=\"480\" height=\"359\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-13 visible and IR images at 23:10 UTC (near the time of 4.25 inch diameter hail)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>As noted above, the coldest cloud top IR brightness temperatures observed for this storm were <strong>-71\u00ba C<\/strong> &#8212; according to the rawinsonde profile data from Rapid City, South Dakota <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em> this temperature corresponded to an altitude of around 55,000 feet or 16,800 meters.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2010\/07\/100724_00Z_KRAP_RAOB.GIF\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Rawinsonde profile from Rapid City SD at 00 UTC on 24 July\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2010\/07\/100724_00Z_KRAP_RAOB.GIF\" alt=\"Rawinsonde profile from Rapid City SD at 00 UTC on 24 July\" width=\"480\" height=\"359\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Rawinsonde profile from Rapid City SD at 00 UTC on 24 July<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>McIDAS images of GOES-13 and GOES-15 10.7 \u00b5m IR images (above) showed the development of severe thunderstorms that produced very large hail, tornadoes, and damaging surface winds (SPC storm reports) in central South Dakota on 23 July 2010. This storm produced the largest US hailstone on record: 8 inch diameter, 18.6 inch circumference, 1.9375 pound [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,11,43,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6213","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-goes-sounder","category-goes-13","category-goes-15","category-severe-convection"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6213","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6213"}],"version-history":[{"count":35,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6213\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29088,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6213\/revisions\/29088"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}