{"id":39935,"date":"2021-02-16T07:11:09","date_gmt":"2021-02-16T07:11:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/?p=39935"},"modified":"2021-02-18T16:46:08","modified_gmt":"2021-02-18T16:46:08","slug":"using-atms-data-to-observe-lake-ice-coverage-over-the-great-lakes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/39935","title":{"rendered":"Using ATMS data to observe lake ice coverage over the Great Lakes"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

ATMS Ice Concentration over the Great Lakes, from overlapping ascending Suomi-NPP passes on 30 January and 15 February 2021 (Click to enlarge)<\/p><\/div>\n

CIMSS<\/a> produces Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS<\/a>) Lake Ice concentration images in a format that can be inserted into AWIPS.\u00a0 These images are created from data downloaded (available at this ftp site<\/a>;\u00a0 imagery is also available here<\/a>) at the DB antennae at CIMSS, and processed with MIRS algorithms<\/a> (all MIRS products are available at this NOAA Website<\/a>) that are incorporated into CSPP<\/a>.\u00a0 \u00a0This document (from ESA)<\/a> includes a figure<\/a> showing how emissivities of ice and water differ, allowing for discrimination between ice and open water.\u00a0 The differences are especially large at lower frequencies.<\/p>\n

The animation below from NOAA\/NESDIS of ice concentration over the USA (including the Great Lakes) (source)<\/a> shows obvious increases and decreases in ice concentration;\u00a0 given the general very cold conditions over the Great Lakes during this time (especially over Lakes Michigan and Superior), the reduction in ice cover on 14-15 February is inconsistent with the cold weather.<\/p>\n

Ice coverage increases from 10-13 February and then decreases.\u00a0 This change in ice coverage matches view angle changes from the ATMS instrument on Suomi NPP, and those view angle changes affect the spatial resolution of the measurements.\u00a0 There was a near-nadir afternoon pass on 10 February<\/a>, and diagnosed ice in Lake Michigan was at a minimum;\u00a0 ascending pass views of Lake Michigan on 12<\/a> and 13 February<\/a> are near the limb and diagnosed ice over Lake Michigan reached a maximum;\u00a0 the view was near nadir again on 15 February<\/a> when, again, diagnosed lake ice was at a minimum.\u00a0 (Suomi NPP Orbit paths are available here<\/a>).\u00a0 It is important when using Ice Coverage data to know the view angle from the satellite!<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

NPP MIRS Ice Coverage, 4 – 15 February 2021, from Ascending (afternoon) Passes (Click to enlarge)<\/p><\/div>\n

MIRS algorithms to compute Ice Concentration use information from ATMS channels 1, 2, 3, 16 and 17.\u00a0 These 5 channels have footprints ranging from 15 to 75 km (at satellite nadir), as shown in the image below, from this paper<\/a>. Note especially how the footprints increase in size at the limb:\u00a0 channel 17’s footprint ranges from 15×15 km at nadir to 68×30 km at the limb!\u00a0 \u00a0A challenge in using ATMS is that the microwave footprint can easily observe both land and water, in which case the microwave data will not give values representative of the lake coverage.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Scanning geometry for 22 ATMS channels. The figure includes footprint sizes at nadir and at the limb (Click to enlarge)<\/p><\/div>\n

The figure below shows circles with diameters of 15, 50 and 75 km;\u00a0 the smaller circle is the approximate nadir footprint of channel 16 and 17 at ATMS;\u00a0 the larger circle is the approximate nadir footprint of channels 1 and 2.\u00a0 Lake Ice resolution from MIRS might be considered to be of the order of 50 km.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Circles with diameters of 15, 50 and 75 km in Lakes Michigan, Huron and (inset) Erie (click to enlarge)<\/p><\/div>\n

NOAA-20 and Suomi-NPP, the two satellites that carry ATMS as part of their payloads, both have 16-day repeats.\u00a0 That is:\u00a0 the satellite traces out the same path every 16 days;\u00a0 in addition, paths are very similar every 5 or 6 days.\u00a0 See, for example, this toggle of (Suomi NPP) NUCAPS soundings points over the South Pacific ocean<\/a>, on 25 July and 10 August 2019, 16 days apart.\u00a0 The same orbit is traced out on these two days.\u00a0 That is why the ATMS ice concentration plots at the top of this post are from 30 January<\/a> and 15 February<\/a>:\u00a0 16 days apart. The two orbit mappings at the links are identical. The 15 February image of orbits is shown below.<\/p>\n

Interpretation of the Ice Concentration imagery at the top of this blog post requires knowledge about the path of Suomi-NPP shown below.\u00a0 Lake Michigan and western Lake Superior are close to nadir, and there should be some ATMS footprints entirely within those lakes.\u00a0 Lakes Huron, Erie and Ontario are far enough away that a user might not trust 100% the data being presented.\u00a0 The ice coverage change<\/em> between the two days might be useful:\u00a0 there is a general increase in concentration over coastal Lakes Michigan and Superior.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Predicted Suomi-NPP Orbits for 15 February 2021 (Click to enlarge)<\/p><\/div>\n

A morning descending pass of Suomi-NPP moved over eastern Lake Ontario, giving the best resolution over that small Great Lake.\u00a0 The 0659 UTC image from 16 February is shown below.\u00a0 Notice the difference in Lakes Superior and Michigan between this image (for which Lakes Superior and Michigan are near the limb) and the image at top (for which Lakes Superior and Michigan are near nadir).<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Suomi NPP ATMS Estimates of Lake Ice, 0659 UTC on 16 February 2021 (Click to enlarge)<\/p><\/div>\n

The 15 February 2021 analysis (from this page<\/a>) from NOAA’s Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab (GLERL) is shown below.\u00a0 Consider the ATMS imagery as an approximation to the observed field. Care in interpretation of ATMS data is a necessity because of errors that occur when pixels are not entirely over water.\u00a0 That is a frequent occurrence when the satellite is scanning along the limb.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Ice concentration over the Great Lakes, from GLERL, 15 February 2021 (Click to enlarge)<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The toggle below (from this site<\/a>) highlights resolution differences between ATMS Channel 1 (23.8 GHz), with 75-km resolution at nadir, and ATMS Channel 17 ( 165.5 GHz), with 15-km resolution at nadir.\u00a0 Note also the differences in the signals between western Lake Erie (ice covered) and eastern Lake Erie (more open water).<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

ATMS imagery (Channels 1 and 17) derived from Suomi NPP at ~1800 UTC on 17 February 2021 (NPP overflew Buffalo NY on this day) (Click to enlarge)<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

CIMSS produces Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS) Lake Ice concentration images in a format that can be inserted into AWIPS.\u00a0 These images are created from data downloaded (available at this ftp site;\u00a0 imagery is also available here) at the DB antennae at CIMSS, and processed with MIRS algorithms (all MIRS products are available at this […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19,"featured_media":39959,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[89,79,78,39,5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-39935","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-atms","category-microwave","category-noaa-20","category-training","category-winter-weather"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39935","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39935"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39935\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":39994,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39935\/revisions\/39994"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/39959"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39935"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39935"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39935"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}