![\"GOES-16](\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/12\/201214_goes16_visible_shortwaveInfrared_infrared_South_America_solar_eclipse_shadow_anim.gif\")
<\/a>GOES-16 \u201cRed\u201d Visible (0.64 \u00b5m),<\/em> Shortwave Infrared (3.9 \u00b5m)<\/em> and “Clean” Infrared Window (10.35 \u00b5m)<\/em> images [click to play animation | MP4<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/div>1-minute\u00a0Mesoscale Domain Sector<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0GOES-16 (GOES-East)<\/em> \u201cRed\u201d Visible (0.64 \u00b5m), Shortwave Infrared (3.9 \u00b5m) and “Clean” Infrared Window (10.35 \u00b5m) images (above)<\/strong><\/em> showed the passage of a total solar eclipse shadow across parts of Chile and Argentina, along with the land surface thermal response due to the interruption of incoming solar radiation. In areas of Argentina beneath the path of totality, the infrared brightness temperature of the land surface decreased by as much as 20-30\u00baC within the umbral shadow.<\/p>\n A larger-scale view of the path of the eclipse shadow was provided by GOES-16 CIMSS Natural Color RGB images (below)<\/strong><\/em>.<\/p>\n GOES-16 CIMSS Natural Color RGB images [click to play animation | MP4<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/div>GOES-16 Near-Infrared “Vegetaton” (0.86 \u00b5m) images (below)<\/strong> <\/em>highlighted an advantage of that spectral band — namely, brighter surface values over land (due to the higher reflectivity of vegetation at that wavelength), providing more contrast between the land surface and the darker eclipse shadow. The 0.86 \u00b5m band is also used to simulate a “green” component for RGB images such as the CIMSS “Natural Color”<\/strong><\/a> product.<\/p>\n GOES-16 Near-Infrared “Vegetaton” (0.86 \u00b5m)<\/em> images (credit: Tim Schmit, NOAA@CIMSS) [click to play animation | MP4<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/div>A closer look at the eclipse shadow passage using 1-minute 0.86 \u00b5m imagery is shown below (with the corresponding CIMSS Natural Color RGB images here<\/strong><\/a>).<\/p>\n GOES-16 Near-Infrared “Vegetaton” (0.86 \u00b5m)<\/em> images (credit: Tim Schmit, NOAA@CIMSS) [click to play animation | MP4<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/div>In a comparison of GOES-16 “Blue” Visible (0.47 \u00b5m), “Red” Visible (0.64 \u00b5m), Near-infrared “Vegetation” (0.86 \u00b5m), CIMSS “Natural Color” RGB and Rayleigh-corrected “True Color” RGB images (below)<\/strong>,<\/em> it can be seen that the Rayleigh-corrected “True Color” is not optimal for displaying features such as solar eclipse shadows (due to over-saturation).<\/p>\n GOES-16 “Blue” Visible (0.47 \u00b5m), “Red” Visible (0.64 \u00b5m), Near-infrared “Vegetation” (0.86 \u00b5m), CIMSS “Natural Color” RGB and Rayleigh-corrected “True Color” RGB mages (credit: Tim Schmit, NOAAf@CIMSS) [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div>Incidentally, although the path of totality passed to the north, some reduction of incoming sunlight was apparent over the A68a iceberg (located just southwest of South Georgia island) on GOES-16 Visible images created using Geo2Grid<\/strong><\/a> (below)<\/strong><\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a>