{"id":36617,"date":"2020-05-07T23:59:36","date_gmt":"2020-05-07T23:59:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/?p=36617"},"modified":"2020-05-13T18:03:21","modified_gmt":"2020-05-13T18:03:21","slug":"hail-producing-supercell-thunderstorm-in-texas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/36617","title":{"rendered":"Hail-producing supercell thunderstorm in Texas"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><div style=\"width: 651px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/05\/200507_goes16_visible_spcStormReports_TX_v2_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/05\/G16_VIS_TX_07MAY2020_B2_2020128_224419_GOES-16_0001PANEL_FRAME00074.GIF\" alt=\"GOES-16 \" width=\"641\" height=\"481\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-16 &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible <em>(0.64 \u00b5m)<\/em> images, with time-matched SPC Storm Reports plotted in red [click to play animation | <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/05\/200507_goes16_visible_spcStormReports_TX_v2_anim.mp4\"><strong>MP4<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/div>As a follow-on to <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/36584\"><strong>this blog post<\/strong><\/a>, we will examine the period following convective initiation and take a closer look at the isolated supercell thunderstorm as it produced a long swath of large hail across far northern Texas on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov\/dailywxmap\/index_20200507.html\"><strong>07 May 2020<\/strong><\/a>. 1-minute <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/23225\"><strong>Mesoscale Domain Sector<\/strong><\/a> GOES-16<em> (GOES-East)<\/em> &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band02.pdf\"><strong>0.64 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) images with plots of time-matched <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spc.noaa.gov\/climo\/reports\/200507_rpts.html\"><strong>SPC Storm Reports<\/strong><\/a> <em><strong>(above)<\/strong><\/em> revealed pulsing overshooting tops as the storm produced hail as large as 3.25 inches in diameter.<\/p>\n<p>In the corresponding GOES-16 &#8220;Clean&#8221; Infrared Window (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band13.pdf\"><strong>10.35 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) images <em><strong>(below)<\/strong>,<\/em> the pulsing overshooting tops exhibited infrared brightness temperatures in the -70 to -80\u00baC range <em>(black to white enhancement)<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 651px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/05\/200507_goes16_infrared_spcStormReports_TX_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/05\/G16_IR_PLAINS_07MAY2020_B13_2020128_224419_GOES-16_0001PANEL_FRAME00074.GIF\" alt=\"GOES-16 &quot;Clean&quot; Infrared Window (10.35 \u00b5m) images, with time-matched SPC Storm Reports plotted in cyan [click to play animation | MP4]\" width=\"641\" height=\"481\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-16 &#8220;Clean&#8221; Infrared Window<em> (10.35 \u00b5m)<\/em> images, with time-matched SPC Storm Reports plotted in cyan [click to play animation | <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/05\/200507_goes16_infrared_spcStormReports_TX_anim.mp4\"><strong>MP4<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/div>In a plot of 00 UTC rawinsonde data from Amarillo, Texas<em><strong> (below)<\/strong><\/em> the tropopause temperature was -61.7\u00baC at the 192 hPa (12.4 km) level &#8212; warming was seen directly above the tropopause, but then air temperatures cooled to the -60 to -70\u00baC range within the 122-100 hPa (15.2-16.3 km) layer. Judging from their infrared brightness temperatures, the overshooting tops likely penetrated into those higher levels.<\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 652px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/05\/200508_00UTC_KAMA_RAOB.GIF\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/05\/200508_00UTC_KAMA_RAOB.GIF\" alt=\"Plot of 00 UTC rawinsonde data from Amarillo, Texas [click to enlarge]\" width=\"642\" height=\"482\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Plot of 00 UTC rawinsonde data from Amarillo, Texas [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div>Slightly longer animations of full-bit-depth GOES-16 Visible and Infrared images from AWIPS <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em> showed the storm-top features in better detail. One low-level feature of interest was the brief formation of inflow feeder bands along the southwest flank of the storm during the 0015-0035 time period (<a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/05\/200507_goes16_visible_inflow_feeder_bands_TX_supercell_anim.gif\"><strong>rocking animation<\/strong><\/a>). The gradual north-northwestward flow of hazy, more humid boundary layer air was also apparent (which likely aided and helped to sustain convective development).<\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 651px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/05\/200507_goes16_visible_infrared_TX_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/05\/tx_ir-20200508_001919.png\" alt=\"GOES-16 &quot;Red&quot; Visible (0.64 \u00b5m) and &quot;Clean&quot; Infrared Window (10.35 \u00b5m) images [click to play animation | MP4]\" width=\"641\" height=\"299\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-16 &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible <em>(0.64 \u00b5m)<\/em> and &#8220;Clean&#8221; Infrared Window <em>(10.35 \u00b5m)<\/em> images [click to play animation | <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/05\/200507_goes16_visible_infrared_TX_anim.mp4\"><strong>MP4<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/div>A prominent and long-lived <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.ametsoc.org\/doi\/abs\/10.1175\/WAF-D-18-0040.1?journalCode=wefo\"><strong>Above-Anvil Cirrus Plume<\/strong><\/a> (AACP) was seen with this severe thunderstorm &#8212; a toggle between GOES-16 Visible and Infrared images at 0105 UTC is shown below. The AACP appeared to exhibit <em>colder<\/em> infrared brightness temperatures, in agreement with the Amarillo rawinsonde profile at the highest altitudes.<\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 652px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/05\/200508_0105utc_goes16_visible_infrared_TX_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/05\/200508_0105utc_goes16_visible_infrared_TX_anim.gif\" alt=\"GOES-16 &quot;Red&quot; Visible (0.64 \u00b5m) and &quot;Clean&quot; Infrared Window (10.35 \u00b5m) images at 0105 UTC [click to enlarge]\" width=\"642\" height=\"300\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-16 &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible <em>(0.64 \u00b5m)<\/em> and &#8220;Clean&#8221; Infrared Window <em>(10.35 \u00b5m)<\/em> images at 0105 UTC [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div>GOES-16 Visible images with and without an overlay of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.goes-r.gov\/spacesegment\/glm.html\"><strong>GLM<\/strong><\/a> Flash Extent Density<em><strong> (below)<\/strong><\/em> showed how electrically active the storm was. The lighting activity began at 2134 UTC, 1 minute after the cloud-top infrared brightness temperature first became -60\u00baC or colder.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 653px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/05\/200507_goes16_visible_glmFlashExtentDensity_TX_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/05\/tx_glm,-20200508_002219.png\" alt=\"GOES-16 &quot;Red&quot; Visible (0.64 \u00b5m) images, with and without an overlay of GLM Flash Extent Density [click to play animation | MP4]\" width=\"643\" height=\"300\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-16 &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible<em> (0.64 \u00b5m)<\/em> images, with and without an overlay of GLM Flash Extent Density [click to play animation | <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/images\/2020\/05\/200507_goes16_visible_glmFlashExtentDensity_TX_anim.mp4\"><strong>MP4<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/div>\n<hr \/>\n<p>GOES-17 also viewed the storm development, albeit at a 10-minute time increment because west Texas sits outside of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ospo.noaa.gov\/Operations\/GOES\/west\/conus-img17.html\">GOES-17&#8217;s &#8216;CONUS&#8217; domain<\/a>. GOES-17&#8217;s more oblique view from the allows the satellite to see more structure on the western flank of the system, particularly beneath the cirrus shield! (Click <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2020\/05\/G17_BAND02_7MAY_8MAY_2019anim.gif\">here <\/a>for a faster animation)<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_36654\" style=\"width: 635px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2020\/05\/G17_BAND02_7MAY_8MAY_2019anim_slower.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-36654\" class=\"wp-image-36654\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2020\/05\/G17_BAND02_7MAY_8MAY_2019anim-1024x768.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"625\" height=\"469\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2020\/05\/G17_BAND02_7MAY_8MAY_2019anim-1024x768.gif 1024w, https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2020\/05\/G17_BAND02_7MAY_8MAY_2019anim-300x225.gif 300w, https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2020\/05\/G17_BAND02_7MAY_8MAY_2019anim-768x576.gif 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 625px) 100vw, 625px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-36654\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-17 Band 2 (0.64 \u00b5m) Visible Imagery, 2000 UTC on 7 May 2020 through 0200 UTC on 8 May 2020 (Click to animate)<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As a follow-on to this blog post, we will examine the period following convective initiation and take a closer look at the isolated supercell thunderstorm as it produced a long swath of large hail across far northern Texas on 07 May 2020. 1-minute Mesoscale Domain Sector GOES-16 (GOES-East) &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible (0.64 \u00b5m) images with plots [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":36619,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[76,74,80,30,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36617","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-glm","category-goes-16","category-goes-17","category-lightning","category-severe-convection"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36617","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36617"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36617\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36656,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36617\/revisions\/36656"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/36619"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36617"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36617"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36617"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}