{"id":32710,"date":"2019-04-02T23:59:14","date_gmt":"2019-04-02T23:59:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/?p=32710"},"modified":"2019-04-08T14:43:10","modified_gmt":"2019-04-08T14:43:10","slug":"hurricane-force-low-off-the-north-carolina-coast","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/32710","title":{"rendered":"Hurricane Force low off the US East Coast"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><div style=\"width: 651px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/190402_goes16_visible_North_Carolina_coastal_low_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/nc_vis-20190402_210127.png\" alt=\"GOES-16 &quot;Red&quot; Visible (0.64 \u00b5m) images [click to play animation | MP4]\" width=\"641\" height=\"367\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-16 &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible<em> (0.64 \u00b5m)<\/em> images [click to play animation | <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/190402_goes16_visible_North_Carolina_coastal_low_anim.mp4\"><strong>MP4<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/div>1-minute <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/23225\"><strong>Mesoscale Domain Sector<\/strong><\/a> GOES-16 <em>(GOES-East)<\/em> &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band02.pdf\"><strong>0.64 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) images <em><strong>(above)<\/strong><\/em> showed a cluster of deep convection just to the north of the center of a rapidly-intensifying midlatitude cyclone (<a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/190402_surface_analyses_anim.gif\"><strong>surface analyses<\/strong><\/a>) off the coast of North Carolina on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov\/dailywxmap\/index_20190402.html\"><strong>02 April 2019<\/strong><\/a>. In addition, convection was later seen developing along the north-south cloud band marking the leading edge of the cyclone&#8217;s cold front. The rapid deepening of this <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/190402_surface_analyses_opc_anim.gif\"><strong>hurricane force low<\/strong><\/a> easily met the criteria of a <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Explosive_cyclogenesis\"><strong>bomb cyclone<\/strong><\/a> &#8212; its central pressure dropped 20 hPa in just 12 hours (from 1004 hPa at 18 UTC on 02 April to 984 hPa at 06 UTC on 03 April).<\/p>\n<p>The primary convective cluster began to exhibit a large amount of lightning after 1830 UTC, as seen in plots of GOES-16 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.goes-r.gov\/spacesegment\/glm.html\"><strong>GLM<\/strong><\/a> Groups <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em>. To the east of this intensifying convection, one <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/190402_pbof_ship_report.text\">ship report<\/a><\/strong> at <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/G16_VIS_GLM_GROUPS_BOMB_CYCLONE_02APR2019_2019092_183526_GOES-16_0001PANEL.GIF\"><strong>18 UTC<\/strong><\/a> included winds from the east at 50 knots &#8212; in addition, a moderate to heavy shower of hail was being reported and their surface visibility was restricted to 1.25 miles (<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/190402_18z_sfc.png\">18 UTC surface analysis<\/a><\/strong>).<\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/190402_goes16_visible_glmGroups_Bomb_Cyclone_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/G16_VIS_GLM_GROUPS_BOMB_CYCLONE_02APR2019_2019092_213127_GOES-16_0001PANEL.GIF\" alt=\"GOES-16 &quot;Red&quot; Visible (0.64 \u00b5m) images, with GLM Groups and surface wind gusts plotted in red [click to play animation | MP4]\" width=\"640\" height=\"480\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-16 &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible <em>(0.64 \u00b5m)<\/em> images, with GLM Groups and surface wind gusts plotted in red [click to play animation | <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/190402_goes16_visible_glmGroups_Bomb_Cyclone_anim.mp4\"><strong>MP4<\/strong><\/a><\/p><\/div>There were several factors pointing to the development of a sting jet with this storm, as discussed <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.weather.us\/intensifying-noreaster-putting-on-a-dynamical-show-off-the-carolina-coast-this-afternoon\/\"><strong>here<\/strong><\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/1suf9Rcl6x\"><strong>here<\/strong><\/a>. GOES-16 Low-level (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band10.pdf\"><strong>7.3 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>), Mid-level (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band09.pdf\"><strong>6.9 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) and Upper-level (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band08.pdf\"><strong>6.2 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) Water Vapor images<em><strong> (below)<\/strong><\/em> revealed distinct areas of warming\/drying<em> (darker shades of yellow to orange)<\/em> that possibly highlighted rapidly-descending air associated with a sting jet (for example, on the <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/G16_WATER_VAPOR_BOMB_CYCLONE_02APR2019_2019092_194619_GOES-16_0003PANELS_A.gif\"><strong>1946 UTC<\/strong><\/a> images).<\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/190402_goes16_waterVapor_Bomb_Cyclone_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/G16_WATER_VAPOR_BOMB_CYCLONE_02APR2019_2019092_194619_GOES-16_0003PANELS_A.gif\" alt=\"GOES-16 Low-level (7.3 \u00b5m), Mid-level (6.9 \u00b5m) and Upper-level (6.2 \u00b5m) Water Vapor images [click to play animation | MP4]\" width=\"640\" height=\"292\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-16 Low-level <em>(7.3 \u00b5m),<\/em> Mid-level <em>(6.9 \u00b5m)<\/em> and Upper-level <em>(6.2 \u00b5m)<\/em> Water Vapor images [click to play animation | <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/190402_goes16_waterVapor_Bomb_Cyclone_anim.mp4\"><strong>MP4<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/div>After 23 UTC, GOES-16 &#8220;Clean&#8221; Infrared Window (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band13.pdf\"><strong>10.3 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) images<em><strong> (below)<\/strong><\/em> portrayed the formation of a large eye-like feature indicative of a warm seclusion (<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/190403_00z_sfc.png\">00 UTC surface analysis<\/a><\/strong>). Lightning activity remained very high during that time.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/190402_goes16_infrared_North_Carolina_coastal_low_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/nc_ir-20190403_004827.png\" alt=\"GOES-16 &quot;Clean&quot; Infrared Window (10.3 \u00b5m) images [click to play MP4 animation]\" width=\"640\" height=\"370\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-16 &#8220;Clean&#8221; Infrared Window <em>(10.3 \u00b5m)<\/em> images [click to play animation | <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/190402_goes16_infrared_North_Carolina_coastal_low_anim.mp4\"><strong>MP4<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/div>\n<p><center><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-lang=\"en\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">Yesterday&#8217;s top long lasting expansive superbolt lightning flash <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/GOES16?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#GOES16<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/GLM?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#GLM<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/NOAASatellites?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@NOAASatellites<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/r4kP7vORjO\">pic.twitter.com\/r4kP7vORjO<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Michael J. Peterson (@WeatherArchive) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/WeatherArchive\/status\/1113788938076938241?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">April 4, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-lang=\"en\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">As you might imagine, this monster system produced some incredible lightning <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/GLM?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#GLM<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/lightningfromspace?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#lightningfromspace<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/GLMTOE?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#GLMTOE<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/diBKAEOJVG\">pic.twitter.com\/diBKAEOJVG<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Scott Rudlosky (@goesglm) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/goesglm\/status\/1113442750790238208?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">April 3, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p><\/center><br \/>\nA comparison between 1-km resolution Terra MODIS Infrared Window (11.0 \u00b5m) imagery at 0237 UTC with an Aqua MODIS Sea Surface Temperature product at 1755 UTC on the following afternoon<em><strong> (below)<\/strong><\/em> showed that the storm intensified and formed the large eye-like feature over the northern portion of the axis of warmest Gulf Stream water (where SST values were in the 70-76\u00baF range).<\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/190403_modis_infraredWindow_seaSurfaceTemperature_bomb_cyclone_2_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/190403_modis_infraredWindow_seaSurfaceTemperature_bomb_cyclone_2_anim.gif\" alt=\"Terra and Aqua MODIS Infrared Window (11.0 \u00b5m) images from 0237 UTC and 0649 UTC, along with the Aqua MODIS Sea Surface Temperature product at 1755 UTC [click to enlarge]\" width=\"640\" height=\"389\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Terra MODIS Infrared Window (11.0 \u00b5m) image at 0237 UTC, along with the 1755 UTC Aqua MODIS Sea Surface Temperature product [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div>With a nighttime overpass of the NOAA-20 satellite at 0651 UTC, the eye-like feature was apparent in VIIRS Infrared Window (11.45 \u00b5m) and Day\/Night Band (0.7 \u00b5m) images <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em>. Although the Moon was in the Waning Crescent phase (at only 8% of Full), that illumination with the aid of airglow was sufficient to provide a useful &#8220;visible image at night&#8221; using the Day\/Night Band; a streak of bright pixels was due to intense lightning activity within a line of thunderstorms just ahead of the cold front. <em>Note: the NOAA-20 images are incorrectly labeled as Suomi NPP.<\/em><\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/190403_0651utc_noaa20_infraredWindow_dayNightBand_surfaceAnalysis_coastal_low_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/190403_0651utc_noaa20_infraredWindow_dayNightBand_surfaceAnalysis_coastal_low_anim.gif\" alt=\"NOAA-20 VIIRS Infrared Window (11.45 \u00b5\u00b5) and Day\/Night Band (0.7 \u00b5m) images [click to enlarge]\" width=\"640\" height=\"370\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">NOAA-20 VIIRS Infrared Window<em> (11.45 \u00b5m)<\/em> and Day\/Night Band <em>(0.7 \u00b5m)<\/em> images, with an overlay of the 06 UTC surface analysis [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>1-minute Mesoscale Domain Sector GOES-16 (GOES-East) &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible (0.64 \u00b5m) images (above) showed a cluster of deep convection just to the north of the center of a rapidly-intensifying midlatitude cyclone (surface analyses) off the coast of North Carolina on 02 April 2019. In addition, convection was later seen developing along the north-south cloud band marking [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":32715,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[70,76,74,30,12,78,71,48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32710","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-aqua","category-glm","category-goes-16","category-lightning","category-modis","category-noaa-20","category-terra","category-viirs"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32710","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32710"}],"version-history":[{"count":29,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32710\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32771,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32710\/revisions\/32771"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32715"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32710"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32710"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32710"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}