{"id":31584,"date":"2019-02-01T20:59:33","date_gmt":"2019-02-01T20:59:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/?p=31584"},"modified":"2019-02-05T03:32:58","modified_gmt":"2019-02-05T03:32:58","slug":"meteorite-impact-in-cuba","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/31584","title":{"rendered":"Meteorite impact in Cuba"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><div style=\"width: 651px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/190201_goes16_splitCloudTopPhase_splitWindowDifference_cirrus_visible_Cuba_meteorite_plume_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/190201_goes16_splitCloudTopPhase_splitWindowDifference_cirrus_visible_Cuba_meteorite_plume_anim.gif\" alt=\"GOES-16 Split Cloud Top Phase (11.2 - 8.4 \u00b5m), Split Window (10.3 - 12.3 \u00b5m), Near-Infrared \" width=\"641\" height=\"370\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-16 Split Cloud Top Phase <em>(11.2 &#8211; 8.4 \u00b5m),<\/em> Split Window <em>(10.3 &#8211; 12.3 \u00b5m),<\/em> Near-Infrared &#8220;Cirrus&#8221; <em>(1.37 \u00b5m)<\/em> and &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible <em>(0.64 \u00b5m)<\/em> images [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div>A <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amsmeteors.org\/2019\/02\/meteorite-hits-cuba-with-huge-sonic-boom\/\"><strong>meteorite<\/strong><\/a> landed near Vi\u00f1ales, Pinar del R\u00edo in western Cuba (about 58 miles or 93 km northeast of San Julian MUSJ) on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov\/dailywxmap\/index_20190201.html\"><strong>01 February 2019<\/strong><\/a>. GOES-16 <em>(GOES-East)<\/em> Split Cloud Top Phase (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_G16_CloudPhaseBTD.pdf\"><strong>11.2 &#8211; 8.4 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>), Split Window (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_SplitWindowDifference.pdf\"><strong>10.3 &#8211; 12.3 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>), Near-Infrared &#8220;Cirrus&#8221; (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band04.pdf\"><strong>1.37 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) and &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band02.pdf\"><strong>0.64 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) images <em><strong>(above)<\/strong><\/em> revealed signatures of the airborne debris cloud as it drifted northeastward then eastward for about an hour after the impact (which occurred around <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/190201_1817utc_goes16_Cuba_meteorite_anim.gif\"><strong>1817 UTC<\/strong><\/a>) &#8212; during that hour (from 1817 to 1917 UTC) the debris cloud traveled about 40 miles. A brief signature of another (lower-altitude) debris cloud moving southwestward was also seen immediately following impact, which was most apparent in the Split Window and Cirrus images.<\/p>\n<p>The signatures in the <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/190201_goes16_splitCloudTopPhase_Cuba_meteorite_plume_anim.gif\"><strong>Split Cloud Top Phase<\/strong><\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/190201_goes16_splitWindow_Cuba_meteorite_plume_anim.gif\"><strong>Split Window<\/strong><\/a> imagery were due to the presence of mineral dust particles within the debris cloud &#8212; the emissivity properties of dust affects the sensed brightness temperatures differently for various infrared spectral bands. The <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/190201_goes16_cirrus_Cuba_meteorite_plume_anim.gif\"><strong>Cirrus<\/strong><\/a> spectral band is useful for detecting the scattering of light by airborne particles such as ice crystals, volcanic ash, smoke or dust. The debris cloud was also casting a subtle shadow onto the surface, as seen in the <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/190201_goes16_visible_Cuba_meteorite_plume_anim.gif\"><strong>Visible<\/strong><\/a> imagery.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/190201_KKEY_RAOBS.TEXT\"><strong>Rawinsonde data<\/strong><\/a> from Key West, Florida <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em> indicated that the northeastward to eastward drift of the debris cloud at a velocity of about 40 mph (35 knots) would have been occurring at altitudes of 4.9-5.5 km (pressures of 565-522 hPa).<\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/190201_KKEY_RAOBS.GIF\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/190201_KKEY_RAOBS.GIF\" alt=\"Plots of rawinsonde data from Key West, Florida [click to enlarge]\" width=\"640\" height=\"425\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Plots of rawinsonde data from Key West, Florida [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div>The GOES-16 <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.goes-r.gov\/spacesegment\/glm.html\">Geostationary Lightning Mapper<\/a><\/strong> also exhibited a signature around the time of the meteorite impact, as discussed <a href=\"https:\/\/nasasport.wordpress.com\/2019\/02\/01\/glm-sees-apparent-meteor-flash-in-western-cuba\/\"><strong>here<\/strong><\/a>. Looking at GOES-16 Upper-level (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band08.pdf\"><strong>6.2 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>), Mid-level (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band09.pdf\"><strong>6.9 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>), Low-level (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band10.pdf\"><strong>7.3 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) and &#8220;Clean&#8221; Infrared Window (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band13.pdf\"><strong>10.3 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) images with plots of GLM Groups <em><strong>(below)<\/strong>,<\/em> a faint debris cloud signature could best be followed in the 7.3 \u00b5m imagery (<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/190201_goes16_lowLevelWaterVapor_Cuba_meteorite_plume_anim.gif\">AWIPS animation<\/a><\/strong>) after the <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/G16_WV_IR_CUBA_METEORITE_01FEB2019_2019032_181714_GOES-16_0004PANELS.GIF\">1817 UTC<\/a><\/strong> impact &#8212; but for a shorter time period than what was seen with the other GOES-16 examples shown above. While the Water Vapor band <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/190201_kkey_waterVapor_weightingFunctions_anim.gif\">weighting functions<\/a><\/strong> for Key West had peaks at fairly low altitudes for 7.3 \u00b5m and 6.9 \u00b5m, the signature for any low\/mid-tropospheric features would have been masked by absorption and re-radiation from moist layers within the upper troposphere.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/190201_goes16_waterVapor_infraredWindow_glmGroups_Cuba_meteorite_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/G16_WV_IR_CUBA_METEORITE_01FEB2019_2019032_181714_GOES-16_0004PANELS.GIF\" alt=\"GOES-16 Upper-level (6.2 \u00b5m, top left), Mid-level (6.9 \u00b5m, top right), Low-level (7.3 \u00b5m, bottom left) and \" width=\"640\" height=\"481\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-16 Upper-level <em>(6.2 \u00b5m, top left),<\/em> Mid-level <em>(6.9 \u00b5m, top right),<\/em> Low-level <em>(7.3 \u00b5m, bottom left)<\/em> and &#8220;Clean&#8221; Infrared Window <em>(10.3 \u00b5m, bottom right)<\/em> images, with GLM Groups accumulated during the 5-minute period ending at the image time plotted in red [click to play animation | <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/190201_goes16_waterVapor_infraredWindow_glmGroups_Cuba_meteorite_anim.mp4\"><strong>MP4<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>* GOES-17 imagery shown here is preliminary and non-operational *<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The bright signature of the bolide exploding as it entered the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere was also detected by the GLM instrument on GOES-17<em>,<\/em> although the viewing angle was much larger (with a zenith angle of 67 degrees, vs 30 degrees from GOES-16). The GLM Groups detected by both GOES-17 and GOES-16 were plotted with and without the native <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/217\"><strong>parallax<\/strong><\/a> correction <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 651px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/190201_1830utc_goes17_goes16_visible_waterVapor_glm_Cuba_meteorite_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/01\/190201_1830utc_goes17_goes16_visible_waterVapor_glm_Cuba_meteorite_anim.gif\" alt=\"&quot;Red&quot; Visible (0.64 \u00b5m) and Low-level Water Vapor (7.3 \u00b5m) images from GOES-17 (left) and GOES-16 (right), with GLM Groups accumulated during the 15-minute period ending at 1830 UTC plotted in red [click to enlarge]\" width=\"641\" height=\"482\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">&#8220;Red&#8221; Visible <em>(0.64 \u00b5m)<\/em> and Low-level Water Vapor <em>(7.3 \u00b5m)<\/em> images from GOES-17 <em>(left)<\/em> and GOES-16<em> (right),<\/em> with GLM Groups accumulated during the 15-minute period ending at 1830 UTC plotted in red [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div><br \/>\n<center><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-lang=\"en\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">The GOES-16 Lightning Mapper (GLM) may have caught the flash from the <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Cuba?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Cuba<\/a> meteorite this aftn. This 4-panel shows an extensive \u201cflash\u201d occurring in a mostly sunny scene. Day Cloud Phase RGB (UL), 10.35um Clean IR (UR), .64um VIS (LL), regional radar (LR) <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/atrtXjzOSf\">pic.twitter.com\/atrtXjzOSf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Steve Cobb (@imnotycobb) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/imnotycobb\/status\/1091454816805666816?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">February 1, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-lang=\"en\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/NWSKeyWest?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@NWSKeyWest<\/a> radar may have detected the meteor that affected western Cuba earlier today. At 121 pm, a signature was detected near Vi\u00f1ales, Cuba, at a height of over 26,000 ft above ground level. <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/flwx?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#flwx<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/KeyWest?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#KeyWest<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/FloridaKeys?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#FloridaKeys<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/meteor?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#meteor<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/R2JIlVwpsS\">pic.twitter.com\/R2JIlVwpsS<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 NWS Key West (@NWSKeyWest) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/NWSKeyWest\/status\/1091469022925852673?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">February 1, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><br \/>\n<\/center><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A meteorite landed near Vi\u00f1ales, Pinar del R\u00edo in western Cuba (about 58 miles or 93 km northeast of San Julian MUSJ) on 01 February 2019. GOES-16 (GOES-East) Split Cloud Top Phase (11.2 &#8211; 8.4 \u00b5m), Split Window (10.3 &#8211; 12.3 \u00b5m), Near-Infrared &#8220;Cirrus&#8221; (1.37 \u00b5m) and &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible (0.64 \u00b5m) images (above) revealed signatures [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":31614,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[74,80,30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31584","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-goes-16","category-goes-17","category-lightning"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31584"}],"version-history":[{"count":51,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31584\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31642,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31584\/revisions\/31642"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/31614"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31584"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}