{"id":31422,"date":"2019-01-19T23:59:53","date_gmt":"2019-01-19T23:59:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/?p=31422"},"modified":"2019-01-22T04:41:39","modified_gmt":"2019-01-22T04:41:39","slug":"goes-17-water-vapor-imagery-sensing-the-surface-in-alaska","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/31422","title":{"rendered":"Surface features seen in GOES Water Vapor imagery"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"GOES-17<\/a>

GOES-17 Low-level Water Vapor (7.3 \u00b5m)<\/em> images, plus topography [click to play animation | MP4<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/div>\n

* GOES-17 images shown here are preliminary and non-operational *<\/em><\/p>\n

A comparison of GOES-17 Low-level Water Vapor (7.3 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) images with topography (above)<\/strong><\/em> revealed that radiation being emitted by the higher elevations of the Brooks Range<\/strong><\/a> in northern Alaska was able to be sensed by the 7.3 \u00b5m detectors — in spite of the very large satellite viewing angle (or zenith angle) of around 75 degrees.<\/p>\n

The GOES-17 ABI<\/strong><\/a> Water Vapor band weighting functions<\/strong><\/a> calculated using 12 UTC rawinsonde data<\/strong><\/a> from Fairbanks, Alaska (below)<\/strong><\/em> showed that the presence of cold, dry air within the middle to upper troposphere had shifted the peak pressure of the 7.3 \u00b5m weighting function downward to 753.63 hPa (corresponding to an altitude of 7053 feet) — which was at or below the elevation of much of the higher terrain of the Brooks Range. There was very little absorption of upwelling surface radiation by the small amount of water vapor that was present within the middle\/upper troposphere, allowing the cold thermal signature of the higher terrain to be observed on the Water Vapor imagery.<\/p>\n

\"GOES-17<\/a>

GOES-17 Water Vapor weighting functions calculated using rawinsonde data from Fairbanks, Alaska [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div>On the following day (19 January<\/strong><\/a>), a very cold\/dry arctic air mass was moving southward across the Upper Midwest and Great Lakes — the coldest temperature in the US that morning (including Alaska) was -42\u00baF at Kabetogama, Minnesota — and the outline of Lake Superior was very apparent in GOES-16 (GOES-East)<\/em> Low-level (7.3 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) and Mid-level (6.9 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) Water Vapor imagery; in fact, a portion of the northwestern shoreline was even faintly visible in Upper-level (6.2 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) Water Vapor images (below)<\/strong><\/em>.<\/p>\n

\"GOES-16<\/a>

GOES-16 Low-level (7.3 \u00b5m)<\/em>, and Mid-level (6.9 \u00b5m)<\/em> and Upper-level (6.2 \u00b5m)<\/em> Water Vapor images [click to play animation | MP4<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/div>Plots of the GOES-16 Water Vapor band weighting functions calculated using 00 UTC rawinsonde data<\/strong><\/a> from International Falls, Minnesota (below)<\/strong><\/em> showed some radiation contribution coming from near or just above the surface. As a result, a signature of the strong surface thermal contrast — between a relatively warm Lake Superior (water surface temperatures in the 30s F)<\/em> and the adjacent cold land surface temperatures<\/strong><\/a> (generally -10 to -20\u00baF)<\/em> — was able to reach the satellite with minimal absorption by water vapor aloft.<\/p>\n

\"GOES-16<\/a>

GOES-16 Water Vapor weighting functions, calculated using rawinsonde data from International Falls, Minnesota [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div>\n

===== 21 January Update =====<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"GOES-16<\/a>

GOES-16 Low-level (7.3 \u00b5m)<\/em> and Mid-level (6.9 \u00b5m)<\/em> Water Vapor images, with rawinsonde sites plotted in cyan [click to play animation | MP4<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/div>In the wake of a large winter storm<\/strong><\/a>, arctic air spread across the eastern US on 21 January (minimum temperatures<\/strong><\/a>,– and the outline of the coasts of Maryland, Virginia and North Carolina could clearly be seen on GOES-16 Low-level (7.3 \u00b5m) Water Vapor images (above)<\/strong><\/em>. In addition, the coast of the Albemarle-Pamlico Sound\u00a0 and the Outer Banks of central North Carolina could even be seen for a short time on Mid-level (6.9 \u00b5m) Water Vapor imagery (for example, at 1502 UTC<\/strong><\/a>).<\/p>\n

This cold\/dry air mass set new daily records for lowest rawinsonde-measured Total Precipitable Water at Greensboro<\/strong><\/a> in central North Carolina (0.04 inch), Roanoke\/Blacksburg<\/strong><\/a> in western Virginia (0.02 inch) and Wallops Island<\/strong><\/a> on the Eastern Shore of Virginia (0.05 inch). GOES-16 Total Precipitable Water product showed values in the 0.01 to 0.09 inch range in the vicinity of Roanoke<\/strong><\/a> and Greensboro<\/strong><\/a>. In plots of the GOES-16 water vapor weighting functions for those 3 rawinsonde sites (below)<\/strong>,<\/em> note the very strong contributions of radiation directly from or just above the surface for the 7.3 \u00b5m and 6.9 \u00b5m spectral bands.<\/p>\n

\"GOES-16<\/a>

GOES-16 water vapor weighting functions, calculated using 12 UTC rawinsonde data from Greensboro, North Carolina [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div>

\"GOES-16<\/a>

GOES-16 water vapor weighting functions, calculated using 12 UTC rawinsonde data from Roanoke\/Blacksburg, Virginia [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div>

\"GOES-16<\/a>

GOES-16 water vapor weighting functions, calculated using 12 UTC rawinsonde data from Wallops Island, Virginia [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

* GOES-17 images shown here are preliminary and non-operational * A comparison of GOES-17 Low-level Water Vapor (7.3 \u00b5m) images with topography (above) revealed that radiation being emitted by the higher elevations of the Brooks Range in northern Alaska was able to be sensed by the 7.3 \u00b5m detectors — in spite of the very […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":31430,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[37,74,80],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31422","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-arctic","category-goes-16","category-goes-17"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31422","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31422"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31422\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31435,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31422\/revisions\/31435"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/31430"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31422"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31422"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31422"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}