{"id":29236,"date":"2018-08-07T21:59:43","date_gmt":"2018-08-07T21:59:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/?p=29236"},"modified":"2018-08-08T21:41:01","modified_gmt":"2018-08-08T21:41:01","slug":"hurricane-john","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/29236","title":{"rendered":"Hurricane John"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><div style=\"width: 651px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/08\/180807_goes16_visible_Hurricane_John_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/08\/20180807140534_-0.10248_0.06944.jpg\" alt=\"GOES-16 \" width=\"641\" height=\"641\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-16 &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible <em>(0.64 \u00b5m)<\/em> images [click to play animation | <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/08\/180807_goes16_visible_Hurricane_John_anim.mp4\"><strong>MP4<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/div>1-minute <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/23225\"><strong>Mesoscale Domain Sector<\/strong><\/a> &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band02.pdf\"><strong>0.64 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) images from the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aos.wisc.edu\/weather\/wx_obs\/GOES16.html\"><strong>AOS<\/strong><\/a> site<em><strong> (above)<\/strong><\/em> showed the circulation of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nhc.noaa.gov\/archive\/2018\/JOHN.shtml?\"><strong>Hurricane John<\/strong><\/a> as it was intensifying from a Category 1 to a Category 2 storm off the west coast of Mexico on 07 August 2018. Several tropical overshooting tops could be seen in the animation.<\/p>\n<p>GOES-16 Upper-level Water Vapor (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band08.pdf\"><strong>6.2 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>), Mid-level Water Vapor (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band09.pdf\"><strong>6.9 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>), Low-level Water Vapor (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band10.pdf\"><strong>7.3 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) and &#8220;Clean&#8221; Infrared Window (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band13.pdf\"><strong>10.3 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) images<em><strong> (below)<\/strong><\/em> revealed an interesting gravity wave that was propagating northward away from the center of John. This wave appeared to perturb the cloud tops &#8212; perhaps via vertical mixing &#8212; leading to a slight <em>warming<\/em> of the colder cloud-top infrared brightness temperatures as the wave passed. The appearance and behavior of this wave was very similar to another observed in Nebraska, Colorado and Kansas on <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/29062\"><strong>22 July<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/08\/180807_goes16_water_vapor_infrared_Hurricane_John_anim.mp4\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/08\/John-20180807_122934.png\" alt=\"GOES-16 Upper-level Water Vapor (6.2 \u00b5m, top left), Mid-level Water Vapor (6.9 \u00b5m, top right), Low-level Water Vapor (7.3 \u00b5m, bottom left) and \" width=\"640\" height=\"368\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-16 Upper-level Water Vapor<em> (6.2 \u00b5m, top left),<\/em> Mid-level Water Vapor<em> (6.9 \u00b5m, top right),<\/em> Low-level Water Vapor <em>(7.3 \u00b5m, bottom left)<\/em> and &#8220;Clean&#8221; Infrared Window<em> (10.3 \u00b5m, bottom right)<\/em> images [click to play MP4 animation]<\/p><\/div>Another item of interest was the circulation of weakening <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nhc.noaa.gov\/archive\/2018\/ILEANA.shtml?\"><strong>Tropical Storm Ileana<\/strong><\/a> being absorbed by the larger circulation of intensifying Hurricane John &#8212; this process was illustrated by 3-hourly 850 hPa <a href=\"http:\/\/tropic.ssec.wisc.edu\/misc\/winds\/info.winds.vor.html\"><strong>relative vorticity<\/strong><\/a> analyses derived from GOES-15 <em>(GOES-West)<\/em> satellite winds <strong><em>(below)<\/em><\/strong>. Similar results were seen at the <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/08\/180807_TS_Ileana_Hurricane_John_700hPa_vorticity_anim.gif\"><strong>700 hPa<\/strong><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/08\/180807_TS_Ileana_Hurricane_John_500hPa_vorticity_anim.gif\"><strong>500 hPa<\/strong><\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/08\/180807_TS_Ileana_Hurricane_John_200hPa_vorticity_anim.gif\"><strong>200 hPa<\/strong><\/a> pressure levels.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 649px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/08\/180807_TS_Ileana_Hurricane_John_850hPa_vorticity_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/08\/180807_TS_Ileana_Hurricane_John_850hPa_vorticity_anim.gif\" alt=\"3-hourly analyses of 850 hPa relative vorticity [click to enlarge]\" width=\"639\" height=\"453\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">3-hourly analyses of 850 hPa relative vorticity [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>===== 08 August Update =====<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 648px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/08\/180808_goes15_goes14_goes17_goes16_visible_Hurricane_John_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/08\/G15_G14_G17_G16_VIS_JOHN_08AUG2017_960x320_B1122_2018220_164500_0004PANELS_00048.GIF\" alt=\"Visible images from GOES-15, GOES-14, GOES-17 and GOES-16 [click to play animation | MP4]\" width=\"638\" height=\"477\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Visible images from GOES-15, GOES-14, GOES-17 and GOES-16 [click to play animation | <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/08\/180808_goes15_goes14_goes17_goes16_visible_Hurricane_John_anim.mp4\"><strong>MP4<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/div>GOES-15 <em>(GOES-West),<\/em> GOES-14, GOES-17 and GOES-16 <em>(GOES-East) <\/em>Visible images <em><strong>(above)<\/strong><\/em> showed 4 views of Hurricane John after it had diminished to a Category 1 storm on 08 August.<\/p>\n<p>Note that the GOES-15 and GOES-14 Visible images do not appear as bright as those from GOES-17 and GOES-16 &#8212; prior to the GOES-R Series of satellites, the performance of visible detectors degraded over time, leading to imagery that appeared more dim as the <a href=\"http:\/\/noaasis.noaa.gov\/NOAASIS\/ml\/imager.html\"><strong>Imager<\/strong><\/a> instrument aged. Visible detectors on the new <a href=\"https:\/\/www.goes-r.gov\/spacesegment\/abi.html\"><strong>ABI<\/strong><\/a> instrument benefit from on-orbit calibration to remedy this type of degradation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>* GOES-17 images shown here preliminary and non-operational *<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>1-minute Mesoscale Domain Sector &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible (0.64 \u00b5m) images from the AOS site (above) showed the circulation of Hurricane John as it was intensifying from a Category 1 to a Category 2 storm off the west coast of Mexico on 07 August 2018. Several tropical overshooting tops could be seen in the animation. GOES-16 Upper-level [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":29239,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[40,43,74,80,25,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29236","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-goes-14","category-goes-15","category-goes-16","category-goes-17","category-satellite-winds","category-tropical-cyclones"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29236","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29236"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29236\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29260,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29236\/revisions\/29260"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29239"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29236"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29236"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29236"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}