{"id":26710,"date":"2018-01-09T23:59:01","date_gmt":"2018-01-09T23:59:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/?p=26710"},"modified":"2018-01-12T23:25:28","modified_gmt":"2018-01-12T23:25:28","slug":"flooding-in-southern-california","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/26710","title":{"rendered":"Flooding in Southern California"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/180108-180109_goes16_infrared_window_surface_weather_SoCal_anim.mp4\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/G16_IR_WXS_SOCAL_08_09JAN2018_960x1280_B13_2018009_180129_0001PANEL_01322.GIF\" alt=\"1-minute GOES-16 Infrared Window (10.3 \u00b5m) images; with hourly reports of surface weather type plotted in yellow [click to play MP4 animation]\" width=\"640\" height=\"480\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">1-minute GOES-16 Infrared Window <em>(10.3 \u00b5m)<\/em> images; with hourly reports of surface weather type plotted in red [click to play MP4 animation]<\/p><\/div>An onshore flow of moisture (<a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/180108_180109_mimic_tpw_epac_anim.gif\"><strong>MIMIC TPW<\/strong><\/a>) in tandem with forcing for ascent with the approach of an <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/180109_15utc_500hPa_analysis.gif\"><strong>upper-level low<\/strong><\/a> and a surface cold\/occluded front brought heavy rainfall and some higher-elevation snowfall (<a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/180109_precipitaion_summary_SoCal.text\"><strong>NWS LOX\/SGX<\/strong><\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/180109_10_wpc_storm_summary.text\"><strong>WPC<\/strong><\/a>) to much of Southern California on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov\/dailywxmap\/index_20180109.html\"><strong>09 January 2018<\/strong><\/a>. To help monitor the event, a GOES-16 <em>(GOES-East)<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/23225\"><strong>Mesoscale Sector<\/strong><\/a> was positioned over the region, providing images at 1-minute intervals. &#8220;Clean&#8221; Infrared Window (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band13.pdf\"><strong>10.3 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) images<em><strong> (above)<\/strong> <\/em>showed the colder clouds associated with periods of moderate to heavy rainfall. Some of this precipitation fell over burn scar areas from wildfires that occurred in December 2017 &#8212; including the <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/?s=Thomas+fire\"><strong>Thomas fire<\/strong><\/a>, which was the largest on record for the state of California &#8212; resulting in numerous mud\/debris slides that caused at least 17 fatalities, destroyed\/damaged hundreds of homes, and closed many streets and highways.<\/p>\n<p>GOES-16 &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band02.pdf\"><strong>0.64 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) images<em><strong> (below)<\/strong><\/em> showed some of the features which helped produce heavier rainfall and snowfall during the daylight hours on 09 January.<\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/180109_goes16_visible_surface_weather_SoCal_anim.mp4\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/G16_VIS_WXS_SOCAL_09JAN2018_960x1280_B2_2018009_180129_0001PANEL_00152.GIF\" alt=\"1-minute GOES-16 \" width=\"640\" height=\"480\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">1-minute GOES-16 &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible<em> (0.64 \u00b5m)<\/em> images; with hourly reports of surface weather type plotted in red [click to play MP4 animation]<\/p><\/div>The circulation of the upper-level low was easily seen on GOES-16 Mid-level Water Vapor (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band09.pdf\"><strong>6.9 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) images <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/180108_09_goes16_water_vapor_surface_weather_Socal_anim.mp4\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/G16_WV_WXS_SOCAL_08_09JAN2018_960x1280_B9_2018009_180129_0001PANEL_01322.GIF\" alt=\"1-minute GOES-16 Water Vapor (6.9 \u00b5m) images; with hourly reports of surface weather type plotted in red [click to play MP4 animation]\" width=\"640\" height=\"480\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">1-minute GOES-16 Water Vapor <em>(6.9 \u00b5m)<\/em> images; with hourly reports of surface weather type plotted in red [click to play MP4 animation]<\/p><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>===== 10 January Update =====<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/180110_2051utc_suomi_npp_viirs_truecolor_falsecolor_SoCal_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/180110_2051utc_suomi_npp_viirs_truecolor_falsecolor_SoCal_anim.gif\" alt=\"Suomi NPP VIIRS True-color and False-color RGB images [click to enlarge]\" width=\"640\" height=\"392\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Suomi NPP VIIRS True-color and False-color RGB images [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div>On the following day, a toggle between Suomi NPP VIIRS True-color and False-color Red-Green-Blue (RGB) images from <a href=\"https:\/\/re.ssec.wisc.edu\/s\/TH2D7\"><strong>RealEarth<\/strong><\/a><em><strong> (above)<\/strong> <\/em>showed <strong>(1)<\/strong> the large burn scar from the Thomas Fire<em> (shades of reddish-brown),<\/em> and <strong>(2)<\/strong> snow cover in the higher terrain <em>(darker shades of cyan)<\/em> on the False-color image. The True-color image revealed sediment from runoff flowing into the nearshore waters from Santa Barbara to Oxnard<em> (shades of brown to light green)<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>A closer look at the Thomas Fire burn scar was provided by 30-meter resolution Landsat-8 False-color RGB imagery<em><strong> (below),<\/strong><\/em> which showed thin filaments of muddy sediment just offshore, as well as fresh snow cover<em> (shades of cyan)<\/em> along or immediately adjacent to the northeastern edge of the burn scar (in the Hines Peak area). On 10 January, the fire was listed as 92% contained (100% containment was declared on <a href=\"https:\/\/inciweb.nwcg.gov\/incident\/article\/5670\/42444\/\"><strong>12 January<\/strong><\/a>).<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 649px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/180110_1834utc_landsat8_falsecolor_Thomas_Fire_CA_burn_scar_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/180110_1834utc_landsat8_falsecolor_Thomas_Fire_CA_burn_scar_anim.gif\" alt=\"Landsat-8 False-color RGB image [click to enlarge]\" width=\"639\" height=\"389\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Landsat-8 False-color RGB image [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>===== 11 January Update =====<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/180110_180111_suomi_npp_viirs_truecolor_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/180110_180111_suomi_npp_viirs_truecolor_anim.gif\" alt=\"Suomi NPP VIIRS True-color images on 10 January and 11 January [click to enlarge]\" width=\"640\" height=\"392\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Suomi NPP VIIRS True-color images on 10 January and 11 January [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div>A comparison of Suomi NPP VIIRS True-color RGB images on 10 January and 11 January<em><strong> (above)<\/strong> <\/em>showed that sediment was flowing farther offshore from the Thomas Fire burn scar area.<\/p>\n<p>Farther to the south, offshore sediment transport was also seen in the San Diego area <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/180111_2030utc_suomi_npp_viirs_truecolor_sgx_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/01\/180111_2030utc_suomi_npp_viirs_truecolor_sgx_anim.gif\" alt=\"Suomi NPP VIIRS True-color image on 11 January [click to enlarge]\" width=\"640\" height=\"392\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Suomi NPP VIIRS True-color image on 11 January [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An onshore flow of moisture (MIMIC TPW) in tandem with forcing for ascent with the approach of an upper-level low and a surface cold\/occluded front brought heavy rainfall and some higher-elevation snowfall (NWS LOX\/SGX | WPC) to much of Southern California on 09 January 2018. To help monitor the event, a GOES-16 (GOES-East) Mesoscale Sector [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":26726,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[74,16,55,53,45,49,48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26710","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-goes-16","category-heavy-rain-flooding","category-landsat","category-real-earth","category-redgreenblue-rgb-images","category-suomi_npp","category-viirs"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26710","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26710"}],"version-history":[{"count":25,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26710\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26744,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26710\/revisions\/26744"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/26726"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26710"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26710"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26710"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}