{"id":26177,"date":"2017-11-23T23:59:08","date_gmt":"2017-11-23T23:59:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/?p=26177"},"modified":"2017-11-28T23:12:01","modified_gmt":"2017-11-28T23:12:01","slug":"eruption-of-popocatepetl-in-mexico","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/26177","title":{"rendered":"Eruptions of Popocat\u00e9petl in Mexico"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/11\/171123_goes16_visible_infrared_Popocatepetyl_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/11\/960x640_AGOES16_B213_GOES16_VIS_IR_POPO_23NOV2017_2017327_212819_0002PANELS.GIF\" alt=\"GOES-16 Visible (0.64 \u00b5m, left) and Infrared Window (10. \u00b5m, right) images, with plots of hourly surface reports [click to play animation]\" width=\"640\" height=\"479\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-16 Visible (0.64 \u00b5m, left) and Infrared Window (10.3 \u00b5m, right) images, with plots of hourly surface reports [click to play animation]<\/p><\/div><em>* GOES-16 data posted on this page are preliminary, non-operational and are undergoing testing *<\/em><\/p>\n<p>An eruption of Mexico&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Popocat%C3%A9petl\"><strong>Popocat\u00e9petl<\/strong><\/a> volcano &#8212; the <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/CarlosMValdes1\/status\/933800398103736321\"><strong>largest since 2013<\/strong><\/a> &#8212; occurred on 23 November 2017. The volcanic cloud was evident in GOES-16 &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band02.pdf\"><strong>0.64 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) and &#8220;Clean&#8221; Infrared Window (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band13.pdf\"><strong>10.3 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a>) images <em><strong>(above)<\/strong> <\/em>as it drifted southward. However, due to the relatively thin nature of the cloud (a result of low values of ash loading), 10.3 \u00b5m infrared brightness temperatures were quite warm (greater than -20\u00baC), making a height determination from the single-band infrared imagery alone rather difficult.<\/p>\n<p>This example demonstrates the value of using multi-spectral image techniques to derive retrieved products &#8212; available from the <a href=\"http:\/\/volcano.ssec.wisc.edu\/\"><strong>NOAA\/CIMSS Volcanic Cloud Monitoring<\/strong><\/a> site &#8212; such as Ash Height <em><strong>(below). <\/strong><\/em>In this case, the retrieved ash cloud height was 7 km or 24,000 feet<em> <em>(darker green enhancement0,<\/em><\/em> even for portions of the cloud with relatively <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/11\/171123_2123utc_ash_height_ash_loading_Popo_anim.gif\"><strong>low ash loading<\/strong><\/a>.<em><br \/>\n<\/em><\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/11\/171123_goes16_popo_ash_height_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/11\/171123_2123utc_ash_height_Popo.png\" alt=\"Ash Cloud Height product [click to play animation]\" width=\"640\" height=\"525\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Ash Cloud Height product [click to play animation]<\/p><\/div>During the following nighttime hours, another eruption occurred, this time sending ash to a slightly higher altitude of 8 km or 26,000 feet<em><strong> (below)<\/strong><\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/11\/171124_goes16_popo_ash_height_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/11\/haimage_07.png\" alt=\"Ash Cloud Height product [click to play animation]\" width=\"640\" height=\"525\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Ash Cloud Height product [click to play animation]<\/p><\/div>A GOES-16 GeoColor animation can be seen <a href=\"http:\/\/rammb.cira.colostate.edu\/ramsdis\/online\/loop.asp?data_folder=loop_of_the_day\/goes-16\/20171123000000&amp;number_of_images_to_display=100&amp;loop_speed_ms=140\"><strong>here<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p>Two of the channels on GOES-16 detect radiation in parts of the electromagnetic spectrum where sulfur dioxide (SO2) absorbs radiation: Band 10 (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band10.pdf\">7.3 \u00b5m<\/a>, the low-level Water Vapor channel) and Band 11 (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band11.pdf\">8.4 \u00b5m<\/a>, the Infrared Cloud Phase channel, see in particular the figure on the first page of the <a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band11.pdf\">Quick Guide<\/a>). The SO2 Red-Green-Blue (RGB) Composite was designed to highlight volcanic plumes, using the Brightness Temperature Difference between the mid-level and low-level Water Vapor Channels (<a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band09.pdf\">6.9 \u00b5m<\/a> &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/goes\/OCLOFactSheetPDFs\/ABIQuickGuide_Band10.pdf\">7.3 \u00b5m<\/a>) as the Red Component, the Brightness Temperature Difference between the Clean Infrared Window (Band 13, 10.3 \u00b5m) and the Infrared Cloud Phase (Band 11, 8.4 \u00b5m) as the Green Component, and the Clean Infrared Window (Band 13, 10.3 \u00b5m) as the Blue Component.\u00a0 The eruption is obvious in the SO2 RGB imagery, below, with magenta and blue values apparent.\u00a0 The volcanic plume&#8217;s appearance differs markedly from that of the convection along the Pacific coast of Mexico south and west of the eruption.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_26207\" style=\"width: 635px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/11\/SO2RGB_2023_2148_23Nov2017anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-26207\" class=\"wp-image-26207\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/11\/SO2RGB_2143_23Nov2017Label.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"625\" height=\"339\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-26207\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-16 SO2 RGB, 2023 UTC 23 November 2017 &#8211; 2148 UTC 23 November 2017 (Click to animate)<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>* GOES-16 data posted on this page are preliminary, non-operational and are undergoing testing * An eruption of Mexico&#8217;s Popocat\u00e9petl volcano &#8212; the largest since 2013 &#8212; occurred on 23 November 2017. The volcanic cloud was evident in GOES-16 &#8220;Red&#8221; Visible (0.64 \u00b5m) and &#8220;Clean&#8221; Infrared Window (10.3 \u00b5m) images (above) as it drifted southward. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":26181,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[74,45,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26177","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-goes-16","category-redgreenblue-rgb-images","category-volcanic-activity"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26177","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26177"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26177\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26219,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26177\/revisions\/26219"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/26181"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26177"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}