{"id":25511,"date":"2017-10-03T22:45:13","date_gmt":"2017-10-03T22:45:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/?p=25511"},"modified":"2017-10-04T17:04:32","modified_gmt":"2017-10-04T17:04:32","slug":"diagnosing-snow-depth-over-montana-using-goes-16","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/25511","title":{"rendered":"Diagnosing Snow Depth over Montana using GOES-16"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

GOES-16 Visible Imagery (0.64 \u00b5m), Snow Ice Near Infrared Imagery (1.61 \u00b5m) and Shortwave Infrared Imagery (3.9 \u00b5m) all at 2157 UTC on 3 October 2017 (Click to enlarge)<\/p><\/div>\n

GOES-16 data posted on this page are preliminary, non-operational and are undergoing testing<\/strong><\/p>\n

A modest early-season storm<\/a> has produced a snowfall over north-central Montana and southern Alberta. This image<\/a> (source<\/a>) shows total precipitation, with a minimum axis over northern Montana that has an echo in the Visible Imagery<\/a> above: Whereas most of the snow cover is bright, a region west of Cut Bank MT<\/a> shows a greyer view, suggestive of less snow on the ground.<\/p>\n

GOES-16 includes a channel that senses reflected solar radiation at 1.61 \u00b5m and this is a wavelength at which snow strongly absorbs radiation. Thus, snow-covered grounds (and cirrus clouds) appear dark in the 1.61 \u00b5m Channel<\/a>, but very bright in the Visible (0.64 \u00b5m). Clouds made up of water droplets are bright in both channels during the day. A Toggle between just the Visible and the Snow\/Ice Channel is shown below to highlight regions of snow where clouds are not present over northern Montana and southern Alberta. Note that snow can be inferred in these regions using only the Visible Imagery because rivers — still ice-free in early October — stand out very well in the Visible.\u00a0 Snow is also apparent in the Mountains of northeastern Wyoming:\u00a0 Bright in the visible, Dark in the Snow\/Ice channel.<\/p>\n

Note that the localized minimum in precipitation, that shows up somewhat dark in the visible, is comparatively bright in the Snow\/Ice Channel.\u00a0 In addition, the 3.9\u00a0\u00b5m Infrared Imagery<\/a> at the same time shows a region of relative warmth:\u00a0 above freezing surrounded to the north and south by sub-freezing brightness temperatures.\u00a0 All three channels — the visible, snow\/ice and shortwave IR suggest a relative minimum in snow from Cut Bank westward to the Rocky Mountains.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

GOES-16 Visible Imagery (0.64 \u00b5m), Snow Ice Near Infrared Imagery (1.61 \u00b5m) at 2157 UTC on 3 October 2017 (Click to enlarge)<\/p><\/div>\n

GOES-16 Baseline Products include a Land Surface Temperature Product that is shown below from 2247 UTC. Temperature warmer than Freezing are diagnosed in\/around Cutbank and to th west, with subfreezing temperatures to the north and south. Previous to that time, the Cloud Mask diagnosed clouds over the snowcover and the Land Surface Temperature did not produce a value. This toggle shows the Cloud Mask at 2227 and 2237 UTC<\/a> — clear skies (black) expand over the snow cover in those ten minutes.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

GOES-16 derived Land Surface Temperature, 2247 UTC on 3 October 2017 (Click to enlarge)<\/p><\/div>\n


\n================= Added 4 October 2017 ====================<\/center>The snow on the ground and clear skies allowed for cold temperatures. The Land Surface Temperature Baseline Product from 1047 UTC, below, shows isolated sub-zero values between Cut Bank and Havre. The morning low in Havre, which had a record snowfall from this storm<\/a>, was 8.<\/p>\n
\"\"<\/a>

GOES-16 derived Land Surface Temperature, 1147 UTC on 3 October 2017 (Click to enlarge)<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

GOES-16 data posted on this page are preliminary, non-operational and are undergoing testing A modest early-season storm has produced a snowfall over north-central Montana and southern Alberta. This image (source) shows total precipitation, with a minimum axis over northern Montana that has an echo in the Visible Imagery above: Whereas most of the snow cover […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19,"featured_media":25515,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[74,5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25511","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-goes-16","category-winter-weather"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25511","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25511"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25511\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25535,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25511\/revisions\/25535"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/25515"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25511"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25511"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25511"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}