{"id":2451,"date":"2009-04-28T23:59:35","date_gmt":"2009-04-28T23:59:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/?p=2451"},"modified":"2009-04-30T22:05:43","modified_gmt":"2009-04-30T22:05:43","slug":"the-complex-structure-and-evolution-of-the-gulf-stream","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/2451","title":{"rendered":"The complex structure and evolution of the Gulf Stream"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/04\/MODIS_SST_20090428_1821.png\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"MODIS Sea Surface Temperature product\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/04\/MODIS_SST_20090428_1821.png\" alt=\"MODIS Sea Surface Temperature product\" width=\"480\" height=\"459\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">MODIS Sea Surface Temperature product<\/p><\/div>\n<p>An AWIPS image of the MODIS Sea Surface Temperature (SST) product <em><strong>(above)<\/strong><\/em> showed the complex structure of the <a title=\"Gulf Stream (Wikipedia)\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gulf_stream\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Gulf Stream<\/strong><\/a> off the east coast of the US on <a title=\"28 April 2009 daily weather map\" href=\"http:\/\/www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov\/dailywxmap\/index_20090428.html\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>28 April 2009<\/strong><\/a>. The SST values were as high as upper 70s F <em>(darker red colors)<\/em> in one of the warm eddies along the southern edge of the Gulf Stream, while water temperatures were as cold as the upper 30s to low 40s F <em>(darker blue colors)<\/em> closer to the mainland. Note the appearance of a number of warm and cold &#8220;meanders&#8221; and &#8220;eddies&#8221; along both sides of the Gulf Stream axis &#8212; these warm and cold water eddy features can reach to depths of almost 4000 m, and the water temperature within these eddies can have an influence on the productivity of fishing areas.<\/p>\n<p>A comparison of the MODIS SST product with sea surface temperature data from the <a title=\"RTG_SST model\" href=\"http:\/\/polar.ncep.noaa.gov\/sst\/oper\/Welcome.html\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>RTG_SST<\/strong><\/a> and the RTG_SST High-Resolution analyses <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em> showed that both the RTG_SST and the RTG_SST_HR\u00c2\u00a0 had a difficult time properly depicting some of the more subtle meanders and eddies along either side of the Gulf Stream axis. At some locations, differences between the MODIS SST value and the RTG_SST\/RTG_SST_HR analyzed SST values were as large as 4-6 degrees F.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/04\/090428_modis_sst_anim.gif\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"MODIS SST + &quot;RTG_SST&quot; and &quot;RTG_SST High Resolution&quot; model temperature fields\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/04\/090428_modis_sst_anim.gif\" alt=\"MODIS SST + RTGSST and HR-RTGSST model temperature fields\" width=\"480\" height=\"459\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">MODIS SST + &quot;RTG_SST&quot; and &quot;RTG_SST High-Resolution&quot; model temperature fields<\/p><\/div>\n<p>A comparison of the 1-km resolution MODIS SST product with the corresponding 4-km resolution GOES-12 10.7 \u00c2\u00b5m IR image <strong>(below)<\/strong> demonstrated the obvious advantage of better spatial resolution for detecting the smaller-scale meanders and eddies. Some of the darker green features seen on the GOES-12 IR image to the east of the Gulf Stream\u00c2\u00a0 were clouds <em>(which were &#8220;blacked out&#8221; by the cloud mask algorithm on the MODIS SST image)<\/em>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/04\/090428_sst_ir_anim.gif\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"1-km resolution MODIS SST product + 4-km resolution GOES-12 10.7 \u00c2\u00b5m IR image\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/04\/090428_sst_ir_anim.gif\" alt=\"1-km reslution MODIS SST product + 4-km resolution GOES-12 10.7 \u00c2\u00b5m IR image\" width=\"480\" height=\"458\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">1-km resolution MODIS SST product + 4-km resolution GOES-12 10.7 \u00c2\u00b5m IR image<\/p><\/div>\n<p>However, the clear advantage of GOES is the higher temporal resolution of the data &#8212; with images available more frequently, one can actually see the evolution and motion of the Gulf Stream itself, as well as some of the meanders and eddies along the periphery of the Gulf Stream during the 28-29 April period <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em>. The maximum speed of the Gulf Stream at the ocean surface is usually about 2.5\u00c2\u00a0meters per second <em>(5.6\u00c2\u00a0miles per hour).<\/em><\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/04\/090428-29_g12_ir_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-12 10.7 \u00c2\u00b5m IR images\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/04\/090428-29_g12_ir_anim.gif\" alt=\"GOES-12 10.7 \u00c2\u00b5m IR images\" width=\"480\" height=\"459\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-12 10.7 \u00c2\u00b5m IR images<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An AWIPS image of the MODIS Sea Surface Temperature (SST) product (above) showed the complex structure of the Gulf Stream off the east coast of the US on 28 April 2009. The SST values were as high as upper 70s F (darker red colors) in one of the warm eddies along the southern edge of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[19,8,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2451","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-goes-12","category-marine-weather","category-modis"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2451","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2451"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2451\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2455,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2451\/revisions\/2455"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2451"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2451"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2451"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}