{"id":24268,"date":"2017-06-28T18:56:48","date_gmt":"2017-06-28T18:56:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/?p=24268"},"modified":"2017-06-29T17:51:21","modified_gmt":"2017-06-29T17:51:21","slug":"why-a-cirrus-channel-is-useful","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/24268","title":{"rendered":"Why a Cirrus Channel is useful"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

GOES-16 Visible Image (0.64 \u00b5m) at 1557 UTC on 28 June 2017 (Click to enlarge)<\/p><\/div>\n

GOES-16 data posted on this page are preliminary, non-operational data and are undergoing testing<\/strong><\/p>\n

Consider the visible image above. Can you tell where the eastern and southern edge of the cirrus shield is over the eastern United States? When the Sun is not on the horizon, thin cirrus can be very hard to detect in visible imagery because cirrus clouds are not efficient back-scatterers of solar radiation (all clouds forward<\/em>-scatter very effectively, but cirrus are optically thin). In a still image, then, with a high sun angle, cirrus can be hard to discern.\u00a0 There are brightness temperature difference fields that can also be used to infer the presence of cirrus.\u00a0 For example, the Split Window Difference field (10.3\u00a0\u00b5m – 12.3 \u00b5m)<\/a> and the Cloud Phase Difference (8.5 \u00b5m – 11.2 \u00b5m)<\/a>, toggled below, will highlight regions of cloudiness.\u00a0 But do they also capture very thin cirrus?<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Split Window Difference field (10.3 \u00b5m – 12.3 \u00b5m) and the Cloud Phase Difference (8.5 \u00b5m – 11.2 \u00b5m) fields at 1557 UTC on 28 June 2017 (Click to enlarge)<\/p><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

The Cirrus Channel on GOES-16 (1.38 \u00b5m<\/a>), below, better captures the areal extent of the cirrus.\u00a0 This is because it is very sensitive to reflective features such as cirrus clouds, and because it is in a region of the electromagnetic spectrum where water vapor absorption occurs — so surface features that might complicate the interpretation are masked (Note, for example, that cumuliform clouds over Northwestern Pennsylvania are not apparent in the Cirrus Band imagery). Click here<\/a> to toggle between all 4 images.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

GOES-16 “Cirrus Channel” (Band 4, 1.38 \u00b5m) fields at 1557 UTC on 28 June 2017 (Click to enlarge)<\/p><\/div>\n

One of the GOES-16 Baseline Products is a Cloud Mask — this is important because many other Baseline Products use the output from the Cloud Mask in decision trees. The toggle below shows the Cirrus Band (1.38 \u00b5m), the Red Visible (0.64 \u00b5m) and the Cloud Mask for 1557 UTC on 28 June 2017.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

GOES-16 “Cirrus Band” (Band 4, 1.38 \u00b5m), “Red Visible” (0.64 \u00b5m) and Cloud Mask Baseline Product (White=Cloud, Black= Clear) (Click to enlarge)<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

GOES-16 data posted on this page are preliminary, non-operational data and are undergoing testing Consider the visible image above. Can you tell where the eastern and southern edge of the cirrus shield is over the eastern United States? When the Sun is not on the horizon, thin cirrus can be very hard to detect in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19,"featured_media":24277,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,74],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24268","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general-interpretation","category-goes-16"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24268","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24268"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24268\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24290,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24268\/revisions\/24290"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24277"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24268"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}