{"id":22840,"date":"2016-12-22T06:21:10","date_gmt":"2016-12-22T06:21:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/?p=22840"},"modified":"2016-12-25T17:10:05","modified_gmt":"2016-12-25T17:10:05","slug":"eruption-of-alaskas-bogoslof-volcano","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/22840","title":{"rendered":"Eruption of Alaska&#8217;s Bogoslof volcano"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2016\/12\/161222_himarari8_goes15_visible_Bogoslof_eruption_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2016\/12\/161222_HIM08_G15_VIS_BOGOSLOF_06.GIF\" alt=\"Himawari-8 0.64 \u00b5m (left) and GOES-15 0.63 \u00b5m (right) Visible images [click to play animation]\" width=\"640\" height=\"480\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Himawari-8 0.64 \u00b5m (left) and GOES-15 0.63 \u00b5m (right) Visible images [click to play animation]<\/p><\/div>Following a short-lived eruption on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.avo.alaska.edu\/activity\/report.php?type=8&amp;id=349921&amp;mode=hans\"><strong>21 December<\/strong><\/a>, the Bogoslof volcano in the eastern Aleutian Island chain of Alaska erupted again at about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.avo.alaska.edu\/activity\/report.php?type=8&amp;id=350011&amp;mode=hans\"><strong>0110 UTC<\/strong><\/a> on 22 December 2016. The volcanic cloud could be seen moving north\/northeastward away from Bogoslof <em>(denoted by the yellow * symbol)<\/em> on Himawari-8 and GOES-15 Visible images <em><strong>(above)<\/strong><\/em>. The higher spatial and temporal resolution from Himawari-8 (0.5 km at nadir, with images every 10 minutes) provided a more detailed view of the cloud feature compared to GOES-15 (with 1.0 km resolution at nadir, and images every 15 minutes); however, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.goes-r.gov\/spacesegment\/abi.html\"><strong>ABI<\/strong><\/a> instrument on the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.goes-r.gov\/\"><strong>GOES-R<\/strong><\/a> series will have an identical 0.5 km resolution <a href=\"http:\/\/www.goes-r.gov\/education\/docs\/ABI-bands-FS\/ABI%20Fact%20Sheet%20Band%202.pdf\"><strong>Visible band<\/strong><\/a>. Another Himawari-8 Visible image animation is available from <a href=\"http:\/\/rammb.cira.colostate.edu\/ramsdis\/online\/loop.asp?data_folder=loop_of_the_day\/20161222000000&amp;number_of_images_to_display=100&amp;loop_speed_ms=350\"><strong>RAMMB<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Multispectral Red\/Green\/Blue (RGB) images from the NOAA\/CIMSS <a href=\"http:\/\/volcano.ssec.wisc.edu\/\"><strong>Volcanic Cloud Monitoring<\/strong><\/a> site <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em> displayed a signal of the volcanic cloud during the ~2.5 hours following the onset of the eruption &#8212; since this particular RGB combination uses the 3.9 \u00b5m Shortwave Infrared band, the volcanic cloud feature appeared as darker shades of magenta during the first few images while reflected solar illumination was present before sunset.<\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 649px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2016\/12\/161222_himawari8_falsecolor_rgb_1_Bogoslof_AK_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2016\/12\/HIMAWARI-8.AHI.2016-12-22_01-40-00.RGB1112or13um_3911um_11um.Aleutians_East_1_km.png\" alt=\"Himawari-8 false-color RGB images [click to play animation]\" width=\"639\" height=\"525\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Himawari-8 false-color RGB images [click to play animation]<\/p><\/div>Another variant of RGB images<em><strong> (below)<\/strong><\/em> uses the 8.5 \u00b5m &#8220;cloud top phase&#8221; band, which is also sensitive to SO2 absorption; in this case, the appearance of the volcanic cloud feature was dominated by shades of yellow, indicating high levels of SO2.<\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 649px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2016\/12\/161222_himawari8_falsecolor_rgb_2_Bogoslof_AK_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2016\/12\/HIMAWARI-8.AHI.2016-12-22_01-40-00.RGB1112um_8511um_11um.Aleutians_East_1_km.png\" alt=\"Himawari-8 false-color RGB images [click to play animation]\" width=\"639\" height=\"525\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Himawari-8 false-color RGB images [click to play animation]<\/p><\/div>A comparison of the 3 Himawari-8 water vapor bands <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em> showed that a strong signature of the volcanic cloud was seen on the lower-tropospheric 7.3 \u00b5m band; this was due to the fact that the 7.3 \u00b5m band is also sensitive to elevated levels of SO2 loading in the atmosphere (which was also noted at the bottom of this <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/21004\"><strong>Mount Pavlof eruption<\/strong><\/a> blog post). These same 3 water vapor bands (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.goes-r.gov\/education\/docs\/ABI-bands-FS\/ABIBand8UpperLevelWVFINAL.pdf\"><strong>Upper-level<\/strong><\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.goes-r.gov\/education\/docs\/ABI-bands-FS\/ABIBand9_MidLevelWV_IR_FINAL.pdf\"><strong>Mid-level<\/strong><\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.goes-r.gov\/education\/docs\/ABI-bands-FS\/ABIBand10_LowerLevel_WV-IR_FINAL.pdf\"><strong>Lower-level<\/strong><\/a>) will be available from the GOES-R series ABI instrument.<\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a class=\"thumbnail\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2016\/12\/161222_himawari8_water_vapor_Bogoslof_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2016\/12\/320x1280_AHIM08_B8910_HIM08_WV_3PANEL_BOGOSLOF_22DEC2016_2016357_040000_0003PANELS.GIF\" alt=\"Himawari-8 6.2 \u00b5m (top), 6.9 \u00b5m (middle) and 7.3 \u00b5m (bottom) Water Vapor images [click to play animation] \" width=\"640\" height=\"480\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Himawari-8 6.2 \u00b5m (top), 6.9 \u00b5m (middle) and 7.3 \u00b5m (bottom) Water Vapor images [click to play animation]<\/p><\/div>A closer view using Himawari-8 false-color images <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em> includes a magenta polygon surrounding the volcanic cloud soon after the onset of the eruption &#8212; this is an example of an experimental automated volcanic eruption <a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2016\/12\/161222_bogoslov_alert.text\"><strong>alerting system<\/strong><\/a>. According to Michael Pavolonis (NOAA\/NESDIS), &#8220;Using our automated cloud object tracking algorithm, the eruption produced a cloud at 01:30 UTC that was about 19 deg C colder than the background imaged by Himawari-8 at 01:20 UTC.\u00a0 Taking into account the pixel size, background cloud cover, and time interval between successive images, the 19 deg C change is about an 11 standard deviation outlier relative to a very large database of meteorological clouds.\u00a0 The vertical growth anomaly calculation is the basis of one the components of our experimental automated volcanic eruption alerting system&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><div style=\"width: 649px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2016\/12\/bogoslof_alert_anim.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2016\/12\/bogoslof_alert_anim.gif\" alt=\"Himawari-8 false-color images, with a polygon surrounding the volcanic cloud [click to enlarge]\" width=\"639\" height=\"525\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Himawari-8 false-color images, with a polygon surrounding the volcanic cloud [click to enlarge]<\/p><\/div>The creation of RGB images such as those shown above will be possible from the GOES-R series of satellites (beginning with GOES-16), since the ABI instrument has the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.goes-r.gov\/education\/docs\/ABI-bands-FS\/ABI_Band11_Cloud-top_Phase_IR_FINAL.pdf\"><strong>8.4 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.goes-r.gov\/education\/docs\/ABI-bands-FS\/Band_15FS_DIRTY_LW_IR_FINAL.pdf\"><strong>12.3 \u00b5m<\/strong><\/a> bands that are not available from the current generation of GOES <a href=\"http:\/\/noaasis.noaa.gov\/NOAASIS\/ml\/imager.html\"><strong>imager<\/strong><\/a> instruments.<\/p>\n<p>Additional satellite images of this event are available from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.weather.gov\/afc\/Bogoslof\"><strong>NWS Anchorage<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Following a short-lived eruption on 21 December, the Bogoslof volcano in the eastern Aleutian Island chain of Alaska erupted again at about 0110 UTC on 22 December 2016. The volcanic cloud could be seen moving north\/northeastward away from Bogoslof (denoted by the yellow * symbol) on Himawari-8 and GOES-15 Visible images (above). The higher spatial [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":22846,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[43,34,62,45,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22840","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-goes-15","category-goes-r","category-himawari-8","category-redgreenblue-rgb-images","category-volcanic-activity"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22840","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22840"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22840\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22862,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22840\/revisions\/22862"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/22846"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22840"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22840"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22840"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}