{"id":2051,"date":"2009-02-26T23:59:39","date_gmt":"2009-02-26T23:59:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/?p=2051"},"modified":"2009-03-03T19:17:52","modified_gmt":"2009-03-03T19:17:52","slug":"gravity-wave-over-the-gulf-of-mexico","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/archives\/2051","title":{"rendered":"Gravity waves over the Gulf of Mexico"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"mceTemp mceIEcenter\">\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/090226_g12_wv_anim.gif\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-12 6.5 \u00c2\u00b5m water vapor images\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/090226_g12_wv_anim.gif\" alt=\"GOES-12 6.5 \u00c2\u00b5m water vapor images\" width=\"480\" height=\"459\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-12 6.5 \u00c2\u00b5m water vapor images<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"mceTemp mceIEcenter\" style=\"text-align: left;\">Kudos once again to David Zaff (<a title=\"NWS Buffalo NY\" href=\"http:\/\/www.erh.noaa.gov\/buf\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>National Weather Service Buffalo NY<\/strong><\/a>) for bringing another interesting feature to our attention. Dave sent an email mentioning a gravity wave that he saw on water vapor imagery propagating westward across the Gulf of Mexico on <a title=\"26 February 2009 daily weather map\" href=\"http:\/\/www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov\/dailywxmap\/index_20090226.html\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>26 February 2009<\/strong><\/a> &#8212; and this wave\u00c2\u00a0 appeared to play a role in setting off some isolated convection north of Buoy 42001 around 17:00 UTC.\u00c2\u00a0 AWIPS images of the GOES-12 6.5 \u00c2\u00b5m water vapor channel <em><strong>(above)<\/strong><\/em> showed the subtle low-altitude gravity wave feature moving from <strong>east to west<\/strong> <em>(in contrast to most of the other high-altitude features moving from <strong>west to east <\/strong>on the imagery)<\/em>.<\/div>\n<div class=\"mceTemp mceIEcenter\" style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p>I&#8217;m usually a fan of color-enhanced water vapor imagery, but in this particular case, the low-altitude wave structure seems to show up a bit better using a simple contrast-stretched gray-scale enhancement. Utilizing the GOES-13 satellite <em>(in orbit at 105\u00c2\u00ba\u00c2\u00a0 West longitude),<\/em> we get a slightly better view of the Gulf of Mexico region <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em> &#8212; and the westward-propagating gravity wave feature is plainly seen <em>(along with a subtle train of waves behind its leading edge)<\/em>. In addition, we can also see that there appeared to be a <strong>second<\/strong> packet of low-altitude gravity waves out ahead of the aforementioned gravity wave <em>(which was moving from southeast to northwest)<\/em>. Convective initiation seems to occur around the time that the primary westward-moving wave intersects the secondary northwestward-moving wave <em>(around 17:00 UTC)<\/em>.<\/div>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/090226_g13_wv_anim.gif\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-13 6.5 \u00c2\u00b5m water vapor images\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/090226_g13_wv_anim.gif\" alt=\"GOES-13 6.5 \u00c2\u00b5m water vapor images\" width=\"480\" height=\"360\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-13 6.5 \u00c2\u00b5m water vapor images<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Looking at GOES-12 3.9 \u00c2\u00b5m shortwave IR imagery <em><strong>(below),<\/strong><\/em> we can see that there was a deck of patchy stratocumulus cloud present over and to the east of the area of convective initiation. The appearance of those clouds changed from <em>light gray<\/em> before sunrise to <em>darker gray<\/em> after sunrise, since the 3.9 \u00c2\u00b5m shortwave IR channel is sensitive to the reflection of solar radiation off the tops of the water droplet clouds<em>.<\/em> Also note how the eastern edge of the stratocumulus cloud deck appears to erode as the westward-propagating gravity wave feature moves through that area &#8212; the passage of the wave apparently acted to mix dryer air aloft downward into the marine boundary layer <em>(a dry layer aloft near 800 hPa was seen on both the <a title=\"Tampa FL rawinsonde data\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/KTBW_20090226_1200.png\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Tampa FL<\/strong><\/a> and <a title=\"New Orleans LA rawinsonde data\" href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/KLIX_20090226_1200.png\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>New Orleans LA<\/strong><\/a> rawinsonde data)<\/em>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/090226_g12_swir_anim.gif\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-12 3.9 \u00c2\u00b5m shortwave IR images\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/090226_g12_swir_anim.gif\" alt=\"GOES-12 3.9 \u00c2\u00b5m shortwave IR images\" width=\"480\" height=\"459\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-12 3.9 \u00c2\u00b5m shortwave IR images<\/p><\/div>\n<p>One curious feature to note on GOES-13 visible imagery <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em> &#8212; which was also seen on the GOES-12 shortwave IR imagery above &#8212; was the fact that a <em>new<\/em> patch of cloudiness appeared to form in the wake of the main gravity wave feature, which exhibited a pronounced <strong>east-northeastward<\/strong> component of motion.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/090226_g13_vis_anim.gif\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-13 visible channel images\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/090226_g13_vis_anim.gif\" alt=\"GOES-13 visible channel images\" width=\"480\" height=\"360\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-13 visible channel images<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/1050mb-900mb_1h_Sat_Winds_20090226_1800.png\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-12 water vapor image + MADIS satellite winds\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/1050mb-900mb_1h_Sat_Winds_20090226_1800.png\" alt=\"GOES-12 water vapor image + MADIS satellite winds\" width=\"480\" height=\"459\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-12 water vapor image + MADIS satellite winds<\/p><\/div>\n<p>A number of satellite-derived wind targets were seen which exhibited an obvious <em>northeasterly<\/em> component: both on GOES MADIS winds around 18:00 UTC <em><strong>(above),<\/strong><\/em> and also on QuikSCAT winds several hours later as the the wave had progressed westward <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/Scat_Winds_-_10m_20090227_0036.png\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"GOES-12 water vapor image + QuikSCAT winds\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/Scat_Winds_-_10m_20090227_0036.png\" alt=\"GOES-12 water vapor image + QuikSCAT winds\" width=\"480\" height=\"461\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">GOES-12 water vapor image + QuikSCAT winds<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/MODIS_SST_20090226_0744.png\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"MODIS Sea Surface Temperature product\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/MODIS_SST_20090226_0744.png\" alt=\"MODIS Sea Surface Temperature product\" width=\"480\" height=\"459\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">MODIS Sea Surface Temperature product<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Two other items are worthy of mentioning, since they may have been a factor in the formation of the isolated convection: (1) a plume of warmer water <em>(due to the Gulf of Mexico Loop Current)<\/em> was evident on the MODIS Sea Surface Temperature product <em><strong>(above),<\/strong><\/em> and (2) the MIMIC Total Precipitable Water product <em><strong>(below)<\/strong><\/em> indicated that a plume of higher TPW was moving northwestward across the Gulf of Mexico, with the highest TPW values <em>(greater than 30 mm, lighter blue colors)<\/em> moving to the north of Buoy 42001 just prior to the time of convective initiation.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/090226_mimic_tpw_anim.gif\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"MIMIC Total Precipitable Water product\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2009\/02\/090226_mimic_tpw_anim.gif\" alt=\"MIMIC Total Precipitable Water product\" width=\"480\" height=\"461\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">MIMIC Total Precipitable Water product<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kudos once again to David Zaff (National Weather Service Buffalo NY) for bringing another interesting feature to our attention. Dave sent an email mentioning a gravity wave that he saw on water vapor imagery propagating westward across the Gulf of Mexico on 26 February 2009 &#8212; and this wave\u00c2\u00a0 appeared to play a role in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[19,11,8,12,25,38],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2051","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-goes-12","category-goes-13","category-marine-weather","category-modis","category-satellite-winds","category-what-the-heck-is-this"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2051","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2051"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2051\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2059,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2051\/revisions\/2059"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2051"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2051"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/satellite-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2051"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}