{"id":362,"date":"2026-05-21T15:24:09","date_gmt":"2026-05-21T20:24:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/?p=362"},"modified":"2026-05-21T15:24:09","modified_gmt":"2026-05-21T20:24:09","slug":"mid-atlantic-downbursts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/2026\/05\/21\/mid-atlantic-downbursts\/","title":{"rendered":"Mid-Atlantic Downbursts"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>As noted in the SPC discussion, destabilization ahead of a shortwave in the Ohio Valley spawned prolific downburst-producing storms, in an environment characterized by 20-30 kt of shear and strong low-level lapse rates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<pre class=\"wp-block-preformatted has-small-font-size\">...Ohio Valley into the Mid-Atlantic and Southern New England...<br>   On the southern fringe of upper troughing over eastern Canada and<br>   the Great Lakes, a weak\/convectively augmented mid-level shortwave<br>   trough will progress northeastward across the OH Valley and central<br>   Appalachians through the day, eventually reaching the Mid-Atlantic<br>   tonight. Robust daytime heating of a modestly moist low-level<br>   airmass (surface dewpoints generally in the low to mid 60s) ahead of<br>   a surface cold front will aid in the development of moderate<br>   instability by early afternoon. Ongoing convection across OH\/KY this<br>   morning may eventually strengthen as it encounters this<br>   destabilizing airmass, and additional thunderstorms are expected to<br>   develop along\/near the cold front by mid afternoon from the central<br>   Appalachians into portions of the Mid-Atlantic and southern New<br>   England.<br><br>   Stronger flow aloft will tend to lag\/remain north of the cold front,<br>   but modest enhancement to the west-southwesterly mid-level flow<br>   along\/near the front should support around 20-30 kt of deep-layer<br>   shear. This will be sufficient for some updraft organization with<br>   mainly multicells expected, although marginal supercell structures<br>   may occur. Low-level lapse rates are expected to become quite steep<br>   through the day, evidenced by a general lack of clouds on recent<br>   visible satellite imagery from central\/eastern WV into the<br>   Mid-Atlantic. This will likely aid efficient downward momentum<br>   transfer in convective downdrafts, with scattered severe\/damaging<br>   winds possible as multiple clusters spread east-northeastward<br>   through the afternoon\/evening. Isolated hail may also occur with the<br>   stronger cores. A Slight Risk for severe\/damaging winds has been<br>   introduced from parts of WV to southern New England given increased<br>   confidence in multiple clusters traversing a narrow zone along\/ahead<br>   of the front.<\/pre>\n\n\n\n<p>In the animation below, reports are valid <em>for the next 45 minutes<\/em>. Thus, the ProbSevere v4 predictions are matched up with what the model is trying to predict (any severe weather in the next 45 minutes and within 15 km). After playing the animation, you can see that PSv4 does an excellent job predicting the severe downbursts in northern Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. A few reports are missed (at the 25% threshold) in Virginia and New York.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-video\"><video height=\"720\" style=\"aspect-ratio: 1280 \/ 720;\" width=\"1280\" controls src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2026\/05\/ps_t04_20260520.mp4\"><\/video><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">ProbSevere v4 probabilities (contours), NWS severe weather warnings (red and orange boxes), SPC reports valid for <em>the next 45 minutes<\/em>, and MRMS MergedReflectivity.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>At 1840Z, you can see the PSv4 probabilities matching up well with future downburst reports in PA, MD, and VA. The 25% contours cover all of the wind reports. There are no NWS severe thunderstorm warnings in this area at this time, indicating that the NWS was perhaps waiting a longer to gain confidence before issuing severe warnings. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There is also an area in central PA with over 50% probability, but no reports. There were wind reports later downstream of this region (see the animation above), so the PSv4 model was too early in this region. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"677\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2026\/05\/iTerm2.vxRmRQ.PS_20260520-1840-1024x677.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-365\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2026\/05\/iTerm2.vxRmRQ.PS_20260520-1840-1024x677.png 1024w, https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2026\/05\/iTerm2.vxRmRQ.PS_20260520-1840-300x198.png 300w, https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2026\/05\/iTerm2.vxRmRQ.PS_20260520-1840-768x508.png 768w, https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2026\/05\/iTerm2.vxRmRQ.PS_20260520-1840.png 1062w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>At 20:16Z, the \u2265 50% contour has expanded in southeast Pennsylvania and northern Maryland. PSv4 is correctly predicting several clusters of wind reports in southeast PA with high probabilities. In Maryland, all five future wind reports (in the next 45 minutes) are covered by the cyan 25% probability contour, in a regions not currently under a severe thunderstorm warning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"677\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2026\/05\/iTerm2.X4Oswj.PS_20260520-2016-1024x677.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-366\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2026\/05\/iTerm2.X4Oswj.PS_20260520-2016-1024x677.png 1024w, https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2026\/05\/iTerm2.X4Oswj.PS_20260520-2016-300x198.png 300w, https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2026\/05\/iTerm2.X4Oswj.PS_20260520-2016-768x508.png 768w, https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2026\/05\/iTerm2.X4Oswj.PS_20260520-2016.png 1062w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>A common trend I see, especially with linear or pseudo-linear features, is that ProbSevere v4 is out ahead of NWS warnings by a little bit (perhaps indicating the model trying to predict further out that most NWS forecasters), and NWS warnings also are slow to expire\/reduce area on the backend (perhaps because forecasters don&#8217;t have a high incentive to reduce false alarm area or time). We see both of these features in New Jersey and Pennsylvania at 21:48Z.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"677\" src=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2026\/05\/iTerm2.d9IoWm.PS_20260520-2148-1024x677.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-367\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2026\/05\/iTerm2.d9IoWm.PS_20260520-2148-1024x677.png 1024w, https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2026\/05\/iTerm2.d9IoWm.PS_20260520-2148-300x198.png 300w, https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2026\/05\/iTerm2.d9IoWm.PS_20260520-2148-768x508.png 768w, https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2026\/05\/iTerm2.d9IoWm.PS_20260520-2148.png 1062w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As noted in the SPC discussion, destabilization ahead of a shortwave in the Ohio Valley spawned prolific downburst-producing storms, in an environment characterized by 20-30 kt of shear and strong low-level lapse rates. &#8230;Ohio Valley into the Mid-Atlantic and Southern New England&#8230; On the southern fringe of upper troughing over eastern Canada and the Great [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":366,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[6],"class_list":["post-362","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-psv4","tag-psv4"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=362"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":368,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362\/revisions\/368"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/366"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=362"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=362"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimss.ssec.wisc.edu\/probsevere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=362"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}