Comparison Summary

report produced with glance, version 0.2.6.18
comparison generated Thu Sep 23 06:58:42 2010 by user evas on craackly.ssec.wisc.edu

file A:

path: /home/evas/GRAFIIRtemp/GlanceTesting/rrWithDiffPlatforms/diff-machines-truth/geocatL2.Meteosat-8.2005176.120000.hdf
md5sum for file A: 540a8002a7f6a3f470eb1a269278fa47
last modified: Fri Sep 17 14:13:43 2010

file B:

path: /home/evas/GRAFIIRtemp/GlanceTesting/rrWithDiffPlatforms/diff-machines-test/geocatL2.Meteosat-8.2005176.120000.hdf
md5sum for file B: 7fa7287497627d5acc0383a92e0de160
last modified: Fri Sep 17 13:51:03 2010

A configuration file was used to control the production report.
Please see this copy of the configuration file for details.

latitude: pixel_latitude
longitude: pixel_longitude
longitude/latitude comparison epsilon: 0.01

lon/lat data that is invalid in either file A or file B: 25.39%

Compared Variables

	Variable: Cloud Mask Epsilon used: 0.0 R-squared Correlation Coefficient: 0.9997992521 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 99.9783% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%
	Variable: Cloud Phase Epsilon used: 0.0 R-squared Correlation Coefficient: 0.999955387933 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 99.9952% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%
	Variable: Cloud Top Height Epsilon used: None Epsilon percent (of file A) used: 0.15% R-squared Correlation Coefficient: 0.999936027411 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 77.2811% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 99.9926%
	Variable: Cloud Top Pressure Epsilon used: None Epsilon percent (of file A) used: 0.15% R-squared Correlation Coefficient: 0.99997144364 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 99.9477% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 99.9926%
	Variable: Cloud Top Temperature Epsilon used: None Epsilon percent (of file A) used: 0.15% R-squared Correlation Coefficient: 0.999905077513 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 99.9687% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 99.9926%
	Variable: Cloud Type Epsilon used: 0.0 R-squared Correlation Coefficient: 0.999950237773 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 99.9952% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%
	Variable: Ecosystem Type Epsilon used: 0.0 R-squared Correlation Coefficient: 1.0 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 100% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%
	Variable: Ice Path, Day Epsilon used: None Epsilon percent (of file A) used: 0.15% R-squared Correlation Coefficient: 0.99999817032 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 99.1671% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 99.9981%
	Variable: Latitude Epsilon used: None Epsilon percent (of file A) used: 0.15% R-squared Correlation Coefficient: 1.0 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 50.0176% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%
	Variable: Liquid Water Path, Day Epsilon used: None Epsilon percent (of file A) used: 0.15% R-squared Correlation Coefficient: 0.999999229872 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 99.4429% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 99.9948%
	Variable: Longitude Epsilon used: None Epsilon percent (of file A) used: 0.15% R-squared Correlation Coefficient: 1.0 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 50.0176% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%
	Variable: Optical Depth Visibility, Day Epsilon used: None Epsilon percent (of file A) used: 0.15% R-squared Correlation Coefficient: 0.999999657953 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 99.4091% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 99.9932%
	Variable: Particle Effective Radius, Day Epsilon used: None Epsilon percent (of file A) used: 0.15% R-squared Correlation Coefficient: 0.99995743902 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 99.3962% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 99.9932%
	Variable: Pixel Surface Type Epsilon used: 0.0 R-squared Correlation Coefficient: 1.0 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 100% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%

Shared Variables

The following variables were common to both files:

pixel_relative_azimuth_angle
nwp_y_index
baseline_seviri_day_quality_flags1
pixel_longitude
baseline_cmask_seviri_cloud_mask_packed
pixel_ecosystem_type
nwp_x_index
baseline_seviri_day_cloud_liquid_water_path
baseline_cld_hght_seviri_cloud_top_height
baseline_cld_hght_seviri_quality_flags1
baseline_seviri_day_cloud_particle_effective_radius
baseline_seviri_day_DCOMP_Qf
baseline_seviri_day_cloud_optical_depth_vis
baseline_cld_hght_seviri_cloud_top_temperature
baseline_cld_hght_seviri_cloud_emissivity
baseline_cld_hght_seviri_cloud_top_pressure
pixel_solar_zenith_angle
baseline_ctype_seviri_cloud_phase
baseline_seviri_day_DCOMP_Qpi
pixel_surface_type
baseline_ctype_seviri_Cldphase_Qpi
baseline_cld_hght_seviri_cloud_beta_1112
baseline_ctype_seviri_Cldphase_Qf
baseline_cld_hght_seviri_Cloud_Height_QF
baseline_cmask_seviri_cloud_mask
baseline_seviri_day_cloud_ice_water_path
pixel_latitude
baseline_ctype_seviri_cloud_type
pixel_satellite_zenith_angle