Comparison Summary

report produced with glance, version 0.2.6.13
comparison generated Fri Oct 23 18:34:36 2009 by user evas on craackly.ssec.wisc.edu

file A:

path: /tmp/graemem/geocatNAV.Meteosat-8.2006237.120000.updated_terms.hdf
md5sum for file A: ee03be65dcdb4557743300fc31230a02
last modified: Fri Oct 23 16:46:20 2009

file B:

path: /home/rayg/Data/seviri_nav/eumetsat_f90_float32_geocatcoords.hdf
md5sum for file B: 8b8672fc258acbc20a8818223b7c5dd5
last modified: Thu Oct 22 23:57:05 2009

latitude: pixel_latitude
longitude: pixel_longitude
longitude/latitude comparison epsilon: 0.1


File A has 12 valid data points not present in File B.
File A has a total of 25.39% invalid longitude/latitude data.

lon/lat data that is invalid in either file A or file B: 25.39%

Compared Variables

Variable: pixel_latitude
Epsilon used: 2e-05
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 49.0491%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%
Variable: pixel_longitude
Epsilon used: 2e-05
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 33.9215%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%

Shared Variables

The following variables were common to both files:

pixel_latitude
pixel_longitude

Unique Variables

Variables only found in file A:

pixel_sea_surface_temperature
pixel_desert_mask
pixel_land_mask
pixel_coast_mask
pixel_satellite_azimuth_angle
pixel_surface_elevation
pixel_volcano_mask
pixel_ecosystem_type
pixel_surface_type
pixel_space_mask
pixel_satellite_zenith_angle
pixel_snow_mask