report produced with glance, version 0.2.6.23
comparison generated Wed Sep 29 04:07:24 2010 by user graemem on craackly.ssec.wisc.edu
file A:
path: /data/graemem/crtm_geocat_vs_fwait_20100922/test_data/rtm_output/geocatRTM.Meteosat-9.2008157.120000.hdf
md5sum for file A: bbdd281a6f1ce48ed84f1ab3274e2087
last modified: Wed Sep 22 22:25:04 2010
file B:
path: /data/graemem/crtm_geocat_vs_fwait_20100922/test_data/rtm_output/MSG9_SEVIRI_2008157_1200_00_CRTM.nc
md5sum for file B: ac4ac85a9b873ab7302901a4a9f3d1c3
last modified: Wed Sep 29 03:08:39 2010
A configuration file was used to control the production report.
Please see this copy of the configuration file
for details.
latitude in A: pixel_latitude
latitude in B: Latitude
longitude in A: pixel_longitude
longitude in B: Longitude
WARNING: 10280820 data points
(74.61% of all data)
show possible mismatch in values stored in file a
and file b longitude and latitude values. Depending on the degree of mismatch, some data value comparisons
in this report may be distorted or spatially nonsensical. Please consider re-running this report and including an
examination of your longitude and latitude variables with appropriate epsilons in order to analyze the significance
of the difference.
View mismatching points in A's lon/lat system
View mismatching points in B's lon/lat system
variable name in A: channel_11_brightness_temperature_clear
variable name in B: BtClr11Pixel
epsilon value: None
"missing" data value in A: -32768
"missing" data value in B: -999.0
