report produced with glance, version 0.2.6.17
comparison generated Thu Apr 15 21:24:40 2010 by user evas on craackly.ssec.wisc.edu
file A:
path: geocatNAV.MTSAT-1R.2009202.033000.hdf
md5sum for file A: 6fec1fabfa21f0125161ee5c9401eb0b
last modified: Wed Apr 14 23:18:30 2010
file B:
path: nav_geocat2.hdf
md5sum for file B: 21a2ee360897c66f77dcb08249f6a3fc
last modified: Wed Apr 14 23:18:47 2010
A configuration file was used to control the production report.
Please see this copy of the configuration file
for details.
Variable: Latitude
Epsilon used: 2e-07
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 35.9622%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 76.4332%Variable: Longitude
Epsilon used: 2e-07
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 3.67118%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 76.4332%
The following variables were common to both files:
pixel_latitude
pixel_longitude
Variables only found in file A:
pixel_sea_surface_temperature
pixel_desert_mask
pixel_land_mask
pixel_coast_mask
pixel_satellite_azimuth_angle
pixel_surface_elevation
pixel_volcano_mask
pixel_ecosystem_type
pixel_surface_type
pixel_space_mask
pixel_satellite_zenith_angle
pixel_snow_mask