
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CIMSS Satellite Blog &#187; Volcanic activity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/category/volcanic-activity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog</link>
	<description>A weblog of meteorological satellite imagery relevant to current weather events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Volcanic plume over the Great Lakes region?</title>
		<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/2963</link>
		<comments>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/2963#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott.bachmeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AWIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MODIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volcanic activity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/?p=2963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A comparison of  GOES-11 and GOES-12 visible channel images (above) revealed an aerosol plume aloft that was oriented northwest-to-southeast over the western Great Lakes region on 13 July 2009. This  example shows the value of  forward scattering to help in the identification these kinds of aerosol plumes &#8212; note how the plume [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090713_g11_g12_vis_anim.gif"><img alt="GOES-11 and GOES-12 visible images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090713_g11_g12_vis_anim.gif" title="GOES-11 and GOES-12 visible images" width="480" height="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-11 and GOES-12 visible images</p></div>
<p>A comparison of  GOES-11 and GOES-12 visible channel images <strong><em>(above)</em></strong> revealed an aerosol plume aloft that was oriented northwest-to-southeast over the western Great Lakes region on <strong><a href="http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/dailywxmap/index_20090713.html">13 July 2009</a></strong>. This  example shows the value of  forward scattering to help in the identification these kinds of aerosol plumes &#8212; note how the plume is much brighter on the GOES-11 image than the GOES-12 image, due to the morning sun&#8217;s position in relation to GOES-11 <em>(located at 135º West longitude)</em> versus GOES-12 <em>(located at 75º West longitude)</em>. Also note how the hazy aerosol plume tended to &#8220;disappear&#8221; on both the GOES-11 and the GOES-12 visible images as the sun angle increased during the morning hours.</p>
<p>Later in the day, this aerosol plume was easily seen on AWIPS images of the MODIS near-IR 1.3 µm &#8220;cirrus detection&#8221; channel <strong><em>(below)</em></strong>. The so-called &#8220;cirrus detection&#8221; channel helps to identify features that are <em>effective scatters of light</em> &#8212; which includes cirrus ice crystals as well as airborne aerosols (such as dust, haze, volcanic ash, or volcanic sulfates).</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090713_modis_cirrus_anim.gif"><img alt="MODIS near-IR cirrus detection images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090713_modis_cirrus_anim.gif" title="MODIS near-IR cirrus detection images" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS near-IR &quot;cirrus detection&quot; images</p></div>
<p>This  aerosol plume exhibited no obvious signal on any of the other conventional MODIS channels, such as the visible, IR window, and water vapor channels <strong><em>(below)</em></strong>. So was this aerosol feature due to smoke aloft from fires in Canada or Alaska, or was it a high-altitude volcanic sulfate plume (likely from the <strong><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/2729">Sarychev Peak eruptions</a></strong> earlier in the Summer)?</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090713_modis_anim.gif"><img alt="MODIS cirrus, visible, IR window, and water vapor channel images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090713_modis_anim.gif" title="MODIS visible, cirrus, IR window, and water vapor images" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS cirrus, visible, IR window, and water vapor channel images</p></div><br />
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090713_pm_iasi_so2.jpg"><img alt="IASI SO2 image (courtesy of Université Libre de Bruxelles)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090713_pm_iasi_so2.jpg" title="IASI SO2 image" width="480" height="464" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">IASI SO2 image (courtesy of Université Libre de Bruxelles)</p></div><br />
As it turns out, this plume was identified as an &#8220;SO2 alert&#8221; on the IASI SO2 product <strong><em>(above, courtesy of <a href="http://cpm-ws4.ulb.ac.be/Alerts/index.php">Université Libre de Bruxelles</a>)</em></strong>. This feature also exhibited SO2 concentrations of about 6-12 Dobson Units on the Aura OMI SO2 product <strong><em>(below, courtesy of <a href="http://satepsanone.nesdis.noaa.gov/pub/OMI/OMISO2/index.html">NOAA/NESDIS</a>)</em></strong>.</p>
<p><div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090713_omi_so2.jpg"><img alt="OMI SO2 image (courtesy of NOAA/NESDIS)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090713_omi_so2.jpg" title="OMI SO2 image" width="480" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">OMI SO2 image (courtesy of NOAA/NESDIS)</p></div>
<p>NOAA ARL <strong><a href="http://www.ready.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html">HYSPLIT</a></strong> backward trajectories <strong><em>(below)</em></strong> suggest that the aerosol plume had spent some time over the Arctic region during the previous week or so, where we had seen similar evidence of high-altitude aerosol plumes on the <strong><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090703_g11_vis_ak_yukon_anim.gif">GOES-11 visible images</a></strong> in early July.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090713_12z_12_14_16km_back_trajectory.jpg"><img alt="NOAA ARL backward trajectories" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090713_12z_12_14_16km_back_trajectory.jpg" title="NOAA ARL backward trajectories" width="480" height="480" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">NOAA ARL backward trajectories</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/2963/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wildfires in Alaska</title>
		<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/2883</link>
		<comments>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/2883#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott.bachmeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AVHRR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fire detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fog detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOES-11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volcanic activity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/?p=2883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2009 wildfire season roared to life in Alaska on 02 July &#8211; 03 July 2009, with a number of very large and very intense fires breaking out across interior portions of the state. A ridge of high pressure was in place over the region, allowing Fairbanks to experience a high temperature above 80º F [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090702_g11_vis_anim.gif"><img alt="GOES-11 visible images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090702_g11_vis_anim.gif" title="GOES-11 visible images" width="480" height="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-11 visible images</p></div>
<p>The 2009 wildfire season roared to life in Alaska on <strong>02 July &#8211; 03 July 2009</strong>, with a number of very large and very intense fires breaking out across interior portions of the state. A <strong><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/NA_IR_Sat_20090703_1245.png">ridge of high pressure</a></strong> was in place over the region, allowing Fairbanks to experience a high temperature above 80º F (27º C) on both days. GOES-11 visible images <strong><em>(above)</em></strong> showed some impressive smoke plumes developing on 02 July, especially from the fire located to the east-southeast of Fort Yukon <em>(station identifier PFYU)</em> &#8212; note the pulses of &#8220;pyrocumulus&#8221; that emanated from this >19,000 acre &#8220;Little Black One&#8221; fire complex:  </p>
<blockquote><p>PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT<br />
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FAIRBANKS AK<br />
1033 AM AKDT FRI JUL 3 2009</p>
<p>&#8230;WILDFIRES BRING SMOKE TO INTERIOR&#8230;</p>
<p>THE MAJORITY OF THE SMOKE IS COMING FROM A WILDFIRE KNOW AS LITTLE BLACK ONE. THIS FIRE IS LOCATED NORTHEAST OF CIRCLE IN THE YUKON FLATS. AS OF 230 PM YESTERDAY THIS FIRE WAS OVER 19000 ACRES. CURRENT SATELLITE IMAGERY SHOWS THIS FIRE TO BE CONTINUING TO INCREASE IN AREA.</p>
<p>OTHER SMALLER FIRES ARE ALSO BURNING ACROSS THE AREA. WINDS ARE CURRENTLY BLOWING THE SMOKE FROM NORTHEAST TO SOUTHWEST ON THE FIRES.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The large and dense smoke plume originating east of Fort Yukon continued to drift southwestward overnight, and had moved over the Anchorage area <em>(station identifier PANC)</em> by the morning hours on 03 July. </p>
<p>Also, in spite of the very large satellite viewing angle, another feature that could be followed on the GOES-11 visible imagery was the southwestward movement of fog and stratus from the Arctic Ocean into interior portions of the North Slope region of Alaska after about 06:00 UTC on 03 July. The visibility dropped to less than 1/2 mile at Kuparuk <em>(station identifier PAKU)</em> at 06:00 UTC, with an air temperature at that time of 34º F (+1º C).</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090703_G11_VIS_LARGE_07_A.GIF"><img alt="GOES-11 visible image" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090703_G11_VIS_LARGE_07_A.GIF" title="GOES-11 visible image" width="480" height="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-11 visible image</p></div>
<p>It is interesting to note the presence of a thin volcanic plume <em>(likely from an earlier eruption of the <strong><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/2729">Sarychev Peak</a></strong> volcano  in the Kuril Islands)</em> farther to the east, located over the Alaska/Yukon border region <strong><em>(above)</em></strong> &#8212; this very high altitude volcanic plume feature is illuminated early in the day <em>(when the sun angle was low, and forward scattering was the highest),</em> but then &#8220;disappears&#8221; on the visible imagery as the sun angle increases and forward scattering diminishes. In contrast, the low-altitude smoke features become brighter as the sun angle increases during the day, allowing more solar reflection to better illuminate the top of the thick smoke <strong><em>(below)</em></strong>.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090703_g11_vis_ak_yukon_anim.gif"><img alt="GOES-11 visible images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090703_g11_vis_ak_yukon_anim.gif" title="GOES-11 visible images" width="480" height="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-11 visible images</p></div>
<p>GOES-11 3.9 µm shortwave IR images <strong><em>(below)</em></strong> revealed a number of very hot fire pixels <em>(black to red color enhancement)</em> &#8212; the hottest pixels  in the &#8220;Little Black One&#8221; fire exhibited an IR brightness temperature of <strong>341.0 K</strong> <em>(the saturation temperature of the GOES-11 shortwave IR detectors)</em> at 06:30 UTC. The fire located to the west-northwest of Nenana <em>(station identifier PANN)</em> exhibited  IR pixels as hot as <strong>340.0 K</strong> at 02:30 UTC. The large area of saturated <em>(red)</em> pixels across the Arctic Slope region at 09:00 UTC was due to sun glint <em>(which also caused the very bright pixels to appear at 09:00 UTC on the visible imagery)</em>.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090702_g11_ir2_anim.gif"><img alt="GOES-11 3.9 µm shortwave IR images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090702_g11_ir2_anim.gif" title="GOES-11 3.9 µm shortwave IR images" width="480" height="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-11 3.9 µm shortwave IR images</p></div>
<p>A comparison of the 1-km resolution NOAA-16 AVHRR 3.7 µm and the 4-km resolution GOES-11 3.9 m shortwave IR images <strong><em>(below)</em></strong> demonstrates the importance of better spatial resolution for detecting hot fire pixels. The hottest IR pixels in both the NOAA-16 and the GOES-11 images were <strong>330.0º K</strong> <em>(darker red color)</em> &#8212; but note that the large fire located southeast of Fort Yukon (PFYU) was only as hot as <strong>307.0º K</strong> <em>(darker black color)</em> on the GOES-11 shortwave IR image.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090703_n16_g11_swir_anim.gif"><img alt="GOES-11 3.9 µm + NOAA-16 3.7 µm shortwave IR images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090703_n16_g11_swir_anim.gif" title="GOES-11 3.9 µm + NOAA-16 3.7 µm shortwave IR images" width="480" height="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-11 3.9 µm + NOAA-16 3.7 µm shortwave IR images</p></div>
<p>The GOES-11 <strong><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/burn/">Wildfire Automated Biomass Burning Algorithm</a></strong> (ABBA) product <strong><em>(below)</em></strong> analyzed the first fire pixels east of the Fort Yukon region around 19:30 UTC on 02 July, several hours before the large smoke plume began to form.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090702_g11_wfabba_anim.gif"><img alt="GOES-11 Wildfire ABBA product" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090702_g11_wfabba_anim.gif" title="GOES-11 Wildfire ABBA product" width="480" height="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-11 Wildfire ABBA product</p></div><br />
<a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Fire_legend.gif"><img alt="Wildfire ABBA legend" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Fire_legend.gif" title="Wildfire ABBA legend" width="480" height="70" /></a>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/2883/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
