
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CIMSS Satellite Blog &#187; Synthetic satellite imagery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/category/synthetic-satellite-imagery/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog</link>
	<description>A weblog of meteorological satellite imagery relevant to current weather events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:14:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Long &#8220;tropospheric rivers&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/2489</link>
		<comments>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/2489#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 20:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott.bachmeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AWIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOES sounder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Synthetic satellite imagery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/?p=2489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Note that the surface frontal structure was more closely aligned with the atmospheric rivers seen on the TPW imagery (above), but there was more of a mismatch with the corresponding water vapor image features (below). This is due to the fact that the water vapor imagery is generally sensing a signal from moisture located within [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/090505_mimic_tpw_anim.gif" target="_blank"><img title="MIMIC Total Precipitable Water" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/090505_mimic_tpw_anim.gif" alt="MIMIC Total Precipitable Water" width="480" height="459" /></a>MIMIC Total Precipitable Water</dt>
</dl>
</div>
<p>AWIPS images of the <a title="MIMIC Total Precipitable Water product" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/tpw2/global2/main.html" target="_blank"><strong>MIMIC Total Precipitable Water</strong></a> (TPW) product <em><strong>(above)</strong></em> showed the presence of  long, narrow  filaments of moisture <em>(often described as &#8220;<a title="tropospheric rivers (Monthly Weather Review)" href="http://ams.allenpress.com/perlserv/?request=get-abstract&amp;doi=10.1175%2F1520-0493(1998)126%3C0725%3AAPAFMF%3E2.0.CO%3B2" target="_blank"><strong>tropospheric rivers</strong></a>&#8220;)</em> that were moving across the North Pacific Ocean and the North Atlantic Ocean during the <strong>04 May &#8211; 05 May 2009</strong> period. Studies by Newell and others suggest that these tropospheric rivers can persist for more than 10 days, and are capable of transporting as much water as the Amazon River!</p>
<p>Composite geostationary satellite water vapor imagery <em><strong>(below)</strong></em> showed a similar signature of enhanced clouds and moisture along the axis these two tropospheric rivers &#8212; however, the presentation on the water vapor imagery was a bit different in terms of width and location.</p>
<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter">
<dl class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/090505_wv_anim.gif" target="_blank"><img title="Composite of geostationary satellite water vapor images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/090505_wv_anim.gif" alt="Composite of geostationary satellite water vapor images" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Composite of geostationary satellite water vapor images</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/090505_mimic_tpw_sfc_anim.gif"><img title="MIMIC TPW + surface analysis" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/090505_mimic_tpw_sfc_anim.gif" alt="MIMIC TPW + surface analysis" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MIMIC TPW + surface analysis</p></div>
<p>Note that the surface frontal structure was more closely aligned with the atmospheric rivers seen on the TPW imagery <em><strong>(above),</strong></em> but there was more of a mismatch with the corresponding water vapor image features <em><strong>(below)</strong></em>. This is due to the fact that the water vapor imagery is generally sensing a signal from moisture located within a fairly deep layer aloft in the middle to upper troposphere, at a level <em>above</em> which the bulk of the total column precipitable water is located.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/090505_wv_sfc_anim.gif" target="_blank"><img title="Composite water vapor imagery + surface analysis" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/090505_wv_sfc_anim.gif" alt="Composite water vapor imagery + surface analysis" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Composite water vapor imagery + surface analysis</p></div>
<p>A 4-panel comparison of the MIMIC TPW, the Blended TPW, and the GOES Sounder TPW products <em><strong>(</strong></em><em><strong>below)</strong></em><em><strong> </strong></em>shows that there is good agreement to the general magnitude of the TPW values between the various products. An <em><strong><a title="animation of 4-panel TPW comparison" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/090505_tpw_4panel_anim.gif" target="_blank">animation</a></strong></em> shows the various strengths and weaknesses of each in terms of their utility for tracking atmospheric rivers. The MIMIC and Blended TPW products <em>(top 2 panels)</em><strong> </strong>had better  temporal continuity, while the GOES water vapor imagery and the GOES Sounder TPW product <em>(bottom 2 panels)</em> suffered from gaps in coverage due to either Spring eclipse or the variable GOES Sounder scanning strategy.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/090505_tpw_4panel.jpg" target="_blank"><img title="Comparison of MIMIC TPW, Blended TPW, GOES Sounder TPW, and water vapor imagery" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/090505_tpw_4panel.jpg" alt="Comparison of MIMIC TPW, Blended TPW, GOES Sounder TPW, and water vapor imagery" width="480" height="457" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Comparison of MIMIC TPW, Blended TPW, GOES Sounder TPW, and water vapor imagery</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/2489/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of pineapples and fire hoses</title>
		<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/1748</link>
		<comments>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/1748#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott.bachmeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AWIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOES-11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Synthetic satellite imagery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/?p=1748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AWIPS images of the GOES-11 6.7 µm water vapor channel (above) showed a very long and well-defined plume of moisture streaming northeastward from just north of the Hawaiian Islands to the Pacific Northwest on 07 January &#8211; 08 January 2009. The National Weather Service forecast office in Seattle, Washington said it best:
AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION
NATIONAL WEATHER [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/090107_g11_wv_anim.gif" target="_blank"><img title="GOES-11 6.7 µm water vapor channel images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/090107_g11_wv_anim.gif" alt="GOES-11 6.7 µm water vapor channel images" width="480" height="359" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-11 6.7 µm water vapor channel images</p></div>
<p>AWIPS images of the GOES-11 6.7 µm water vapor channel <em><strong>(above)</strong></em> showed a very long and well-defined plume of moisture streaming northeastward from just north of the Hawaiian Islands to the Pacific Northwest on <strong><a href="http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/dailywxmap/index_20090107.html">07 January</a> &#8211; <a href="http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/dailywxmap/index_20090108.html">08 January 2009</a></strong>. The National Weather Service forecast office in <a title="NWS Seattle, Washington" href="http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/sew/" target="_blank"><strong>Seattle, Washington</strong></a> said it best:</p>
<blockquote><p>AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION<br />
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE SEATTLE WA<br />
340 PM PST WED JAN 7 2009</p>
<p>.SHORT TERM&#8230;HEAVY RAIN AND FLOODING EVENT IS UNDERWAY. A LONG PLUME OF MOISTURE EMANATING FROM WEST OF HAWAII IS CURRENTLY POINTED AT SW WA/NW ORE. THE AXIS OF THE MOISTURE PLUME HAS BEEN SLOWLY SAGGING SOUTH TODAY&#8230;THOUGH EVERYWHERE HAS GOTTEN AT LEAST SOME AMOUNT OF RAIN. <strong><em>SOME PEOPLE REFER TO THIS PATTERN AS THE PINEAPPLE EXPRESS&#8230;WHILE OTHERS CALL IT A METEOROLOGICAL FIRE HOSE</em>.</strong> BOTH TERMS APPLY HERE. 850-700 MB WIND FLOW IS MORE WESTERLY THAN WITH MOST HEAVY RAIN EVENTS (AS OPPOSED TO SOUTHWESTERLY)&#8230;SO RAIN IS FOCUSING A BIT HARDER THAN USUAL ON RIVERS WITH HEADWATERS IN THE CASCADES. THIS FLOODING EVENT COULD HAVE MANY PARALLELS TO THE NOVEMBER 2006 EVENT.</p></blockquote>
<pre class="glossaryProduct"><a onclick="return popup(this, 'notes')" href="http://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=AREA%20FORECAST%20DISCUSSION">
</a></pre>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/090107_blendedTPW_anim.gif" target="_blank"><img title="Blended Total Precipitable Water product" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/090107_blendedTPW_anim.gif" alt="Blended Total Precipitable Water product" width="480" height="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Blended Total Precipitable Water product</p></div>
<p>AWIPS images of both the CIRA <a title="Blended Total Precipitable Water product" href="http://amsu.cira.colostate.edu/TPW/global.htm" target="_blank"><strong>Blended Total Precipitable Water</strong></a> product <em><strong>(above)</strong></em> and the CIMSS  <a title="MIMIC Total Precipitable Water product" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/tpw2/epac/main.html" target="_blank"><strong>MIMIC Total Trecipitable Water</strong></a> product <em><strong>(below)</strong></em> showed that TPW values were generally in the <strong>30-40 mm (1.2-1.6 inches)</strong> range within this moisture plume. With the larger areal coverage of the CIMSS MIMIC TPW product display, you can get a better feel for the fact that this moisture plume had connections to the rich moisture contained within the Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) as it began to surge northeastward on 06 January.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/090107_mimicTPW_anim.gif" target="_blank"><img title="MIMIC Total Precipitable Water product" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/090107_mimicTPW_anim.gif" alt="MIMIC Total Precipitable Water product" width="480" height="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MIMIC Total Precipitable Water product</p></div>
<p>Heavy rainfall amounts included <strong>9.30 inches</strong> at June Lake in Oregon and <strong>9.05 inches</strong> at Wickersham in Washington &#8212; and as a result, there were widespread reports of flooding, mudslides, and avalanches as this plume of moisture moved inland and interacted with the topography of the region <em><strong>(shown below)</strong></em>. In addition, strong winds were reported in parts of the region <em>(with a wind gust of 130 mph at the top of Magic Mile Ski Lift in Timberline, Oregon)</em>.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/090108_00z_topo_awips2.jpg" target="_blank"><img title="AWIPS-2 topography image" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/090108_00z_topo_awips2.jpg" alt="AWIPS-2 topography image" width="480" height="411" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">AWIPS-2 topography image</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/1748/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
