
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CIMSS Satellite Blog &#187; MODIS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/category/modis/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog</link>
	<description>A weblog of meteorological satellite imagery relevant to current weather events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:14:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Using MODIS and AVHRR imagery in AWIPS to interrogate snow cover and cloud features across Idaho and Montana</title>
		<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/3821</link>
		<comments>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/3821#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott.bachmeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AVHRR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOES sounder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MODIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/?p=3821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CIMSS has been distributing MODIS imagery and products in AWIPS (via LDM subscription) since 2006 &#8212; and we are now in the process of testing and evaluating AVHRR imagery and products for distribution to NWS forecast offices via a similar process. Let&#8217;s now utilize a few of these MODIS and AVHRR products to interrogate snow [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/091113_modis_vis_snow_ice_anim.gif"><img title="MODIS visible and near-IR snow/ice channel images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/091113_modis_vis_snow_ice_anim.gif" alt="MODIS visible and near-IR snow/ice channel images" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS visible and near-IR snow/ice channel images</p></div>
<p>CIMSS has been distributing <strong><a href="http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/~jordang/awips-modis/index.html">MODIS imagery and products in AWIPS</a></strong> (via LDM subscription) since 2006 &#8212; and we are now in the process of testing and evaluating AVHRR imagery and products for distribution to NWS forecast offices via a similar process. Let&#8217;s now utilize a few of these MODIS and AVHRR products to interrogate snow cover and cloud features across parts of Idaho and western Montana on <strong><a href="http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/dailywxmap/index_20091113.html">13 November 2009</a></strong>.  A comparison of the 1-km resolution MODIS visible channel and 2.1 µm near-IR &#8220;snow/ice channel&#8221; images <strong><em>(above)</em></strong> showed a broad area of snow cover across the region, which fell during the previous 2 days. Snow cover <em>(in addition to dense tree cover, and water)</em> are strong absorbers at the 2.1 µm wavelength, so these features appear much <strong>darker</strong> on the snow/ice channel image &#8212; therefore,  <em>bright</em> features on the visible image that are also <em>dark</em> on  the snow/ice image are indeed snow. The maximum snow depth at the time was <strong>17 inches</strong> <em>(43 cm)</em> at Bozeman (station identifier KBZN), located near the center of the images.</p>
<p>A comparison of the 1-km resolution MODIS snow/ice channel and the MODIS Land Surface Temperature (LST) product <strong><em>(below)</em></strong> revealed that this  area of snow cover was having an obvious effect on Land Surface Temperatures across the state of Montana: LST values in the bare ground portions of the east were in the <strong>40º to 50º F</strong> range <em>(green to yellow colors),</em> while the areas with deep snow on the ground exhibited LST values in the <strong>+5º to +15º F</strong> range <em>(cyan to blue colors)</em>. The daily high temperatures across the state of Montana on 13 November  ranged from <strong>20º F</strong> at Three Forks in the southwest to <strong>44º F</strong> at Glendive in the far east &#8212; and the coldest morning low was <strong>-14º F</strong> at Wisdom in the far west.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/091113_modis_snow_ice_lst_anim.gif"><img title="MODIS snow/ice channel and Land Surface Temperature product" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/091113_modis_snow_ice_lst_anim.gif" alt="MODIS snow/ice channel and Land Surface Temperature product" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS snow/ice channel and Land Surface Temperature product</p></div>
<p>Now let&#8217;s focus our attention on the cloud features that were over parts of  Idaho and  Montana at that time. A comparison of the 1-km resolution MODIS 11.0 µm &#8220;IR window&#8221; and 3.7 µm &#8220;shortwave IR&#8221; images <strong><em>(below)</em></strong> showed that there were some very cold cloud features that were likely cirrus<em> (brightness temperatures of <strong>-30º to -40º C</strong>, blue to green colors)</em> over northern Idaho and far northwestern Montana on the IR window image &#8212; however, there was a large area of clouds located just to the east of those cirrus clouds that exhibited significantly <strong>warmer</strong> <em>(<strong>+15º to +25º C</strong>, darker gray)</em> appearance on the 3.7 µm shortwave IR image. The shortwave IR channel is very sensitive to the reflection of solar radiation of the tops of supercooled water droplet clouds &#8212; so a quick comparison of the IR window and the shortwave IR channels offers some cursory information on the character and composition of various cloud features. Note that there also appeared to be a few other darker patches of supercooled water droplet clouds located over parts of southwestern Montana and southern Idaho.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/091113_modis_ir_swir_anim.gif"><img title="MODIS 11.0 µm IR window and 3.7 µm shortwave IR images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/091113_modis_ir_swir_anim.gif" alt="MODIS 11.0 µm IR window and 3.7 µm shortwave IR images" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS 11.0 µm IR window and 3.7 µm shortwave IR images</p></div>
<p>The 4-km resolution MODIS Cloud Phase product <strong><em>(below)</em></strong> offered confirmation about the presence of ice crystal cirrus clouds <em>(salmon color enhancement)</em> over northern Idaho and far northwestern Montana, with supercooled water droplet clouds <em>(blue color enhancement)</em> located farther to the east.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/MODIS_CPI_20091113_2003.png"><img title="MODIS Cloud Phase product" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/MODIS_CPI_20091113_2003.png" alt="MODIS Cloud Phase product" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS Cloud Phase product</p></div>
<p>The  1-km resolution AVHRR Cloud Type product <strong><em>(below)</em></strong> supported the MODIS Cloud Phase product, indicating  supercooled water droplet cloud <em>(cyan color enhancement)</em> to the east of the various classifications of ice crystal cloud <em>(yellow, orange, and red color enhancements)</em> over northern Idaho and far northwestern Montana.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/AVHRR_CLD_TYPE_20091113_2032.png"><img title="AVHRR Cloud Type product" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/AVHRR_CLD_TYPE_20091113_2032.png" alt="AVHRR Cloud Type product" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">AVHRR Cloud Type product</p></div>
<p>The 1-km resolution AVHRR Cloud Top Temperature (CTT) product <strong><em>(below)</em></strong> showed that the area of supercooled water droplet cloud exhibited CTT values of <strong>-18º to -20º C</strong> <em>(cyan colors),</em> with the cirrus cloud features farther to the west exhibiting CTT values as cold as <strong>-40º to -50º C</strong> <em>(darker blue colors)</em>.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/AVHRR_CTT_20091113_2032.png"><img title="AVHRR Cloud Top Temperature product" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/AVHRR_CTT_20091113_2032.png" alt="AVHRR Cloud Top Temperature product" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">AVHRR Cloud Top Temperature product</p></div>
<p>The 1-km resolution AVHRR Cloud Top Height product <strong><em>(below)</em></strong> indicated that the tops of the supercooled water droplet clouds over northwestern Montana were around 4 km or 13,000 feet <em>(light yellow color enhancement),</em> with the tops of the cirrus clouds farther to the west at a much higher 8 km or 26,000 feet <em>(darker orange color enhancement)</em>.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/AVHRR_CLD_HGT_20091113_2032.png"><img title="AVHRR Cloud Top Height product" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/AVHRR_CLD_HGT_20091113_2032.png" alt="AVHRR Cloud Top Height product" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">AVHRR Cloud Top Height product</p></div>
<p>The 1-km resolution AVHRR Cloud Particle Effective Radius product <strong><em>(below)</em></strong> indicated that the supercooled water droplet cloud particles in northwestern Montana were generally in the 20-25 micrometer range <em>(cyan colors),</em> with the cirrus cloud ice crystals farther west at a much larger 40-50 micrometers <em>(darker blue colors)</em>.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/AVHRR_CLD_PER_20091113_2032.png"><img title="AVHRR Cloud Particle Effective Radius product" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/AVHRR_CLD_PER_20091113_2032.png" alt="AVHRR Cloud Particle Effective Radius product" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">AVHRR Cloud Particle Effective Radius product</p></div>
<p>For the sake of comparison, let&#8217;s also examine the corresponding  &#8220;10 km&#8221; resolution GOES Sounder Cloud Top Height (CTH) derived product image  <strong><em>(below),</em></strong> which actually has an effective field of view closer to 20 km for large satellite viewing angles over the northern Lower 48 states &#8212; Sounder CTH values ranged from <strong>7,000-12,000 feet</strong> <em>(orange to yellow to green colors)</em> for the supercooled water droplet clouds in northwestern Montana up to <strong>35,000 feet</strong> <em>(lighter cyan colors)</em> for the cirrus clouds located just to the west. </p>
<p>Note that the GOES Sounder Cloud Top Height product <em>(as well as some of the AVHRR cloud products shown above)</em>  indicated a number of &#8220;false cloud features&#8221; in the area of the deep snow cover over southwestern Montana &#8212; the large temperature gradients associated with the edges of such areas of  snow cover can sometimes fool the cloud product algorithms into portraying cloud top height or cloud top temperature data where no clouds actually exist.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><em><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/NA_GOES_Sounder_DPI_CTH_20091113_2000.png"><img title="GOES Sounder Cloud Top Height derived product image" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/NA_GOES_Sounder_DPI_CTH_20091113_2000.png" alt="GOES Sounder Cloud Top Height derived product image" width="480" height="459" /></a></em><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES Sounder Cloud Top Height derived product image</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/3821/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enhanced turbidity of waters along the Gulf Coast</title>
		<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/3829</link>
		<comments>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/3829#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott.bachmeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AWIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy rain / flooding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MODIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/?p=3829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A sequence of three MODIS true color images from the SSEC MODIS Today site (above) showed an increasing level of turbidity of the water along the Gulf Coast &#8212; the 3 images are from 30 September, 01 November, and 10 November 2009. This increase in turbidity can be directly attributed to the runoff of sediment-rich [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/MODIS_sep-nov_anim.gif"><img alt="MODIS true color images (30 September, 01 November, 10 November)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/MODIS_sep-nov_anim.gif" title="MODIS true color images (30 September, 01 November, 10 November)" width="480" height="480" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS true color images (30 September, 01 November, 10 November)</p></div>
<p>A sequence of three MODIS true color images from the <strong><a href="http://ge.ssec.wisc.edu/modis-today/index.php?satellite=a1&#038;product=true_color&#038;date=2009_11_12_316&#038;overlay_sector=false&#038;overlay_state=true&#038;overlay_coastline=true&#038;sector=USA7&#038;resolution=2000m">SSEC MODIS Today</a></strong> site <strong><em>(above)</em></strong> showed an increasing level of turbidity of the water along the Gulf Coast &#8212; the 3 images are from 30 September, 01 November, and 10 November 2009. This increase in turbidity can be directly attributed to the runoff of sediment-rich water due to heavy precipitation across much of the Gulf Coast states from late October into early  November, as shown in the 14-day observed precipitation map <strong><em>(below)</em></strong>. <em>Special thanks to Steve Davis and Jeff Craven at the <a href="http://www.crh.noaa.gov/mkx/">National Weather Service forecast office at Milwaukee/Sullivan</a> for creating/capturing these  images and bringing this case to our attention!</em></p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/14DayPrecipNov122009.PNG.png"><img alt="14-day observed precipitation" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/14DayPrecipNov122009.PNG.png" title="14-day observed precipitation" width="480" height="230" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">14-day observed precipitation</p></div>
<p>AWIPS images of the MODIS Sea Surface Temperature (SST) product <strong><em>(below)</em></strong> showed that the Gulf of Mexico  immediately offshore was significantly colder due to this discharge of sediment-rich water from rivers draining from the Gulf Coast states &#8212; SST values were in the low to mid 60s F <em>(darker green colors)</em> right along the coast, compared to the mid 70s to near 80º F <em>(darker red colors)</em> farther offshore.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/091110-12_modis_sst_anim.gif"><img alt="MODIS Sea Surface Temperature product (November 10 - 12)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/091110-12_modis_sst_anim.gif" title="MODIS Sea Surface Temperature product (November 10 - 12)" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS Sea Surface Temperature product (November 10 - 12)</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/3829/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
