
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CIMSS Satellite Blog &#187; MODIS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/category/modis/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog</link>
	<description>A weblog of meteorological satellite imagery relevant to current weather events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:08:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Freezing fog in the Upper Midwest region</title>
		<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9729</link>
		<comments>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9729#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott.bachmeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AVHRR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fog detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOES-13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOES-R]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MODIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/?p=9729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AWIPS images of the 4-km resolution GOES-13 10.7 µm &#8211; 3.9 µm &#8220;fog/stratus product&#8221; (above; click image to play animation) showed a large area of fog and/or stratus (yellow to orange color enhancement) that was increasing in areal coverage during the pre-dawn hours on 06 February 2012. Although the fog/stratus product is useful for locating [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a class="thumbnail" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120206_g13_fog_anim.gif"><img class=" " title="GOES-13 fog/stratus product (click image to play animation)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Reg_11-3.9_Sat_20120206_0815.png" alt="GOES-13 fog/stratus product (click image to play animation)" width="480" height="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-13 fog/stratus product (click image to play animation)</p></div>
<p>AWIPS images of the 4-km resolution GOES-13 10.7 µm &#8211; 3.9 µm &#8220;fog/stratus product&#8221; <strong><em>(above; click image to play animation)</em></strong> showed a large area of fog and/or stratus <em>(yellow to orange color enhancement)</em> that was increasing in areal coverage during the pre-dawn hours on <strong>06 February 2012</strong>. Although the fog/stratus product is useful for locating the presence and temporal trends of such features, it does not offer any reliable indication of whether it is fog on the ground or stratus cloud aloft.</p>
<p>One product that attempts to give the forecaster some quantitative information is the GOES Low CLoud Base (LCB) prodcut <strong><em>(below; click image to play animation),</em></strong> which attempts to blend surface observations with satellite data to indicate whether the cloud base is above or below the threshold of 1000 feet.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a class="thumbnail" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120206_g13_lcb_anim.gif"><img class=" " title="GOES-13 Low Cloud Base product (click image o play animation)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/NA_GOES_DPI_LCB_20120206_0815.png" alt="GOES-13 Low Cloud Base product (click image o play animation)" width="480" height="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-13 Low Cloud Base product (click image o play animation)</p></div>
<p>With 1-km resolution data, the MODIS instrument aboard the polar-orbiting Terra and Aqua satellites offers a similar &#8220;fog/stratus product&#8221; <strong><em>(below)</em></strong> that provides  better clarity, especially regarding the exact location of the edges of the fog and/or stratus.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120206_modis_fog_anim.gif"><img title="MODIS fog/stratus product images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120206_modis_fog_anim.gif" alt="MODIS fog/stratus product images" width="480" height="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS fog/stratus product images</p></div>
<p>In this particular case, a number of locations beneath the western and southern edge of the fog/stratus feature were expereincing freezing fog <strong><em>(below)</em></strong> and visibilities of 1/4 mile or less, which was creating hazardous road conditions and prompting the issuance of Freezing Fog Advisories.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/METAR_Plot_20120206_0800.png"><img title="MODIS fog/stratus product with METAR surface reports" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/METAR_Plot_20120206_0800.png" alt="MODIS fog/stratus product with METAR surface reports" width="480" height="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS fog/stratus product with METAR surface reports</p></div>
<p>As part of CIMSS participation in <strong><a title="GOES-R Proving Ground" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes_r/proving-ground.html">GOES-R Proving Ground</a></strong> activities, products are being developed which can provide more quantitative information about such parameters as Fog Depth and the Probability of Marginal Visual Flight Rules (MVFR) or Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) conditions <strong><em>(below)</em></strong>. In this case, across the southwestern part of Iowa <em>(where widespread freezing fog was being reported),</em> the fog depth was as high as 1400-1500 feet, with probabilities of MVFR and IFR conditions as high as 75-90% and 60-75%, respectively.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120206_modis_fog_depth_mvfr_ifr_prob_anim.gif"><img title="MODIS Fog Depth, MVFR Probability, and IFR Probability products" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120206_modis_fog_depth_mvfr_ifr_prob_anim.gif" alt="MODIS Fog Depth, MVFR Probability, and IFR Probability products" width="480" height="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS Fog Depth, MVFR Probability, and IFR Probability products</p></div>
<p>Shortly after sunrise, it is interesting to note that a comparison of 1-km resolution POES AVHRR 0.63 µm visible channel, 3.74 µm &#8220;shortwave IR&#8221; channel, and 10.8 µm channel &#8220;IR window&#8221; channel images <strong><em>(below)</em></strong> revealed that part of the swath of fresh snow cover <em>(as deep as 4-6 inches)</em> across western Iowa could be seen through the translucent western edge of the fog/stratus deck that was beginning to burn off during the morning hours. The fog/stratus deck appears <strong>warmer</strong> <em>(darker gray enhancement)</em> om the 3.74 µm image, due to the sensitivity of that channel to the reflection of solar radiation off the tops of supercooled water droplet clouds.</p>
<p>Farther to the south, note the presence of narrow fingers of valley fog in the Ozark Mountains and surrounding regions in Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Missouri.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120206_poes_avhrr_vis_swir_ir_anim.gif"><img title="POES AVHRR 0.63 µm visible, 3.74 µm &quot;shortwave IR&quot;, and 10.8 µm &quot;IR window&quot; images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120206_poes_avhrr_vis_swir_ir_anim.gif" alt="POES AVHRR 0.63 µm visible, 3.74 µm &quot;shortwave IR&quot;, and 10.8 µm &quot;IR window&quot; images" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">POES AVHRR 0.63 µm visible, 3.74 µm &quot;shortwave IR&quot;, and 10.8 µm &quot;IR window&quot; images</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9729/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Large central US storm: record snowfall in Colorado, heavy rain in Texas and Kansas</title>
		<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9706</link>
		<comments>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9706#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott.bachmeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AVHRR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOES-13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy rain / flooding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MODIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red/Green/Blue (RGB) images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suomi NPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIIRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/?p=9706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AWIPS images of 4-km resolution GOES-13 6.5 µm water vapor channel data (above; click image to play animation) showed the middle-tropospheric circulation and cloud features associated with the large storm system which brought heavy snow, heavy rainfall, and severe thunderstorms to much of the central US on 03 February &#8211; 04 February 2012. Snowfall amounts included [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a class="thumbnail" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120203-04_g13_wv_anim.gif"><img class="  " title="GOES-13 6.5 µm water vapor channel images (click image to play animation)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/US_Water_Vapor_20120203_0800.png" alt="GOES-13 6.5 µm water vapor channel images (click image to play animation)" width="480" height="381" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-13 6.5 µm water vapor channel images (click image to play animation)</p></div>
<p>AWIPS images of 4-km resolution GOES-13 6.5 µm water vapor channel data <strong><em>(above; click image to play animation)</em></strong> showed the middle-tropospheric circulation and cloud features associated with the large storm system which brought heavy snow, heavy rainfall, and severe thunderstorms to much of the central US on <strong><a title="03 February 2012 daily weather map" href="http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/dailywxmap/index_20120203.html">03 February</a> &#8211; <a title="04 February 2012 daily weather map" href="http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/dailywxmap/index_20120204.html">04 February 2012</a></strong>. Snowfall amounts included 51.1 inches at Pinecliffe, Colorado, 26.0 inches at Laramie, Wyoming, 17.0 inches at Tyron, Nebraska, and 11.5 inches at Cumberland, Iowa.</p>
<p>Denver received <strong>15.9</strong> inches of snow during 02/03/04 February, setting a new 3-day record accumulation for the month of February. Boulder also set a new single-storm snowfall record, with <strong>22.7</strong> inches of snowfall (<a title="NWS Denver/Boulder CO storm summary" href="http://www.crh.noaa.gov/news/display_cmsstory.php?wfo=bou&amp;storyid=78669&amp;source=0"><strong>NWS Denver/Boulder CO storm summary</strong></a>).</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120204_poes_avhrr_vis_swir_anim.gif"><img title="POES AVHRR 0.63 µm visible channel + 3.74 µm shortwave IR channel images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120204_poes_avhrr_vis_swir_anim.gif" alt="POES AVHRR 0.63 µm visible channel + 3.74 µm shortwave IR channel images" width="480" height="381" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">POES AVHRR 0.63 µm visible channel + 3.74 µm shortwave IR channel images</p></div>
<p>As the storm departed, a comparison of AWIPS images of 1-km resolution POES AVHRR 0.63 µm visible channel and 3.74 µm shortwave IR data <strong><em>(above)</em></strong> at 15:06 UTC <em>(8:06 am local time)</em> on 04 February showed that some low clouds persisted across much of northeastern Colorado, backed up against the highest terrain of the Continental Divide in some places. The low clouds showed up as <strong>darker gray</strong> features on the shortwave IR image, due to the sensitivity of reflection of solar radiation off of cloud top supercooled water droplets at the 3.74 µm wavelength.</p>
<p>At 17:47 UTC <em>(10:47 am local time),</em> a comparison of AWIPS images of 1-km resolution MODIS 0.65 µm visible channel data with the corresponding MODIS false-color Red/Green/Blue (RGB) image <em>(created using MODIS channel 01/07/07 as the red/green/blue components of the image)</em> indicated that most of the low clouds <em>(which appeared as varying shades of white on the false-color image)</em> had dissipated, revealing a good deal of the snow cover <em>(which appeared as darker shades of red on the false-color image)</em>. A few streaks of high-level cirrus clouds could also be seen over the snow cover. Bare ground appeared cyan on the false-color image.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120204_modis_vis_rgb_co_anim.gif"><img title="MODIS 0.65 µm visible channel + False-color Red/Green/Blue (RGB) images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120204_modis_vis_rgb_co_anim.gif" alt="MODIS 0.65 µm visible channel + False-color Red/Green/Blue (RGB) images" width="480" height="381" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS 0.65 µm visible channel + False-color Red/Green/Blue (RGB) images</p></div>
<p>About 2 hours later, a more detailed example of using false color images to discriminate between snow cover and supercooled water droplet clouds can be seen with a 375-meter resolution Suomi NPP VIIRS Red/Green/Blue (RGB) image <em><strong>(below),</strong></em> created using Band I1 <em>(0.64 micrometer visible)</em> as the red component and Band I3<em> (1.61 micrometer near-IR)</em> as the green and blue components of the image.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120204_SUOMI_NPP_VIIRS_I1I3I3_RGB.JPG"><img title="Suomi NPP VIIRS false color RGB image" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120204_SUOMI_NPP_VIIRS_I1I3I3_RGB.JPG" alt="Suomi NPP VIIRS false color RGB image" width="480" height="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Suomi NPP VIIRS false color RGB image</p></div>
<p>Farther to the east and south, heavy rainfall amounts included 9.30 inches at Romayer, Texas, 5.69 inches at Alexandria, Louisiana, and 4.34 inches at Medicine Lodge, Kansas. Wichita, Kansas received 2.86 inches of rain &#8212; the wettest February day on record at that location. Severe thunderstorms produced one tornado and hail up to 2.0 inches in diameter in Texas (<strong><a title="SPC storm reports" href="http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/120203_rpts.html">SPC storm reports</a></strong>). A McIDAS image of 375-meter resolution Suomi NPP VIIRS 11.45 µm IR channel data <strong><em>(below)</em></strong> showed very intricate detail to the cloud top IR brightess temperature structure associated with strong thunderstorms producing heavy rainfall and flash flooding across the Interstate 35 corridor in the Austin/San Antonio, Texas region during the pre-dawn hours on 04 February. VIIRS IR brightness temperatures were as cold as -81º C with the far southwestern storm &#8212; and rare &#8220;warm trench&#8221; signatures <em>(a ring of warmer cloud top temperatures surrounding a well-defined cold overshootng top)</em> were seen associated with the 2 storms located near Austin-Bergstrom International airport (KAUS) and Houston County Airport (KDKR).</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120204_suomi_npp_viirs_ir_tx_anim.gif"><img title="Suomi NPP VIIRS 11.45 µm IR image + Station locations and Interstate highways" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120204_suomi_npp_viirs_ir_tx_anim.gif" alt="Suomi NPP VIIRS 11.45 µm IR image + Station locations and Interstate highways" width="480" height="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Suomi NPP VIIRS 11.45 µm IR image + Station locations and Interstate highways</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>===== 05 February Update =====</strong></p>
<p>A large portion of the resulting swath of snow on the ground across parts of Wyoming, Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas could be seen on a 250-meter resolution MODIS true color RGB image from the <strong><a title="SSEC MODIS Today site" href="http://ge.ssec.wisc.edu/modis-today/index.php?satellite=a1&amp;product=true_color&amp;date=2012_02_05_036&amp;overlay_sector=false&amp;overlay_state=true&amp;overlay_coastline=true">SSEC MODIS Today</a></strong> site <em><strong>(below, viewed using Google Earth)</strong></em> at 20:17 UTC on 05 February 2012.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120205_modis_truecolor_snow_swath.jpg"><img title="MODIS true color image (viewed using Google Earth)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/120205_modis_truecolor_snow_swath.jpg" alt="MODIS true color image (viewed using Google Earth)" width="480" height="308" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS true color image (viewed using Google Earth)</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9706/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Record cold continues across interior Alaska</title>
		<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9672</link>
		<comments>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9672#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott.bachmeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arctic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVHRR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MODIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suomi NPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIIRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/?p=9672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Record cold continued across the interior of Alaska, with Fairbanks reaching a minimum temperature of -50º F on 28 January 2012 and -51º F on 29 January 2012. These were the first -50º F temperatures at Fairbanks since 2006 (NWS Fairbanks public information statements). The coldest temperature reported was -65º F at Galena and by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120128-29_avhrr_modis_ir_metars_ak_anim.gif"><img alt="POES AVHRR 12.0 µm and MODIS 11.0 µm IR images (with METAR surface reports)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120128-29_avhrr_modis_ir_metars_ak_anim.gif" title="POES AVHRR 12.0 µm and MODIS 11.0 µm IR images (with METAR surface reports)" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">POES AVHRR 12.0 µm and MODIS 11.0 µm IR images (with METAR surface reports)</p></div>
<p>Record cold continued across the interior of Alaska, with Fairbanks reaching a minimum temperature of -50º F on <strong>28 January 2012</strong> and -51º F on <strong>29 January 2012</strong>. These were the first -50º F temperatures at Fairbanks since 2006 (<strong><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120228_pafg_pns.text" title="NWS Fairbanks public information statements">NWS Fairbanks public information statements</a></strong>). The coldest temperature reported was <strong>-65º F</strong> at Galena and by a coopertive observer at Fort Yukon (<strong><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120229_pafa_rtp.text" title="Fairbanks regional temperature and precipitation data">Fairbanks region temperature and precipitation data</a></strong>).</p>
<p>A sequence of AWIPS images of 1-km resolution POES <strong><a href="http://noaasis.noaa.gov/NOAASIS/ml/avhrr.html" title="AVHRR instrument">AVHRR</a></strong> 12.0 µm IR and <strong><a href="http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/" title="MODIS instrument">MODIS</a></strong> 11.0 µm IR data <strong><em>(above)</em></strong> revealed the expansion of surface IR brightness temperatures of -50º C or colder <em>(violet to white color enhancement)</em> during the early morning hours on 28 and 29 January. The coldest surface air temperatures at the times of the IR images included -50º F at Fairbanks <em>(station identifier PAFA)</em> and -60º F at Fort Yukon <em>(station identifier PFYU)</em> and Tanana <em>(station identifier PATA)</em>. The signature of cold air drainage into lower elevation terrain <em>(such as the relatively narrow river valleys along the south side of the <strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooks_Range" title="Brooks Range (Wikipedia)">Brooks Range</a></strong>, and also the broad <strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yukon_Flats" title="Yukon Flats (Wikipedia)">Yukon Flats</a></strong>)</em> could be seen on the 1-km resolution IR images.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120128_SUOMI_NPP_VIIRS_IR_AK_1.GIF"><img alt="Suomi NPP VIIRS 11.450 µm (Band I5) IR image" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120128_SUOMI_NPP_VIIRS_IR_AK_1.GIF" title="Suomi NPP VIIRS 11.450 µm (Band I5) IR image" width="480" height="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Suomi NPP VIIRS 11.450 µm (Band I5) IR image</p></div>
<p>The pattern of cold air drainage into lower elevations could be seen in even greater detail using McIDAS images of 375-meter resolution <strong><a href="http://npp.gsfc.nasa.gov/" title="Suomi NPP satellite">Suomi NPP</a></strong> <strong><a href="http://npp.gsfc.nasa.gov/viirs.html" title="VIIRS instrument">VIIRS</a></strong> 10.450 µm IR data at 12:06 UTC on 28 January, over northwestern Alaska and the Yukon Territory of Canada <strong><em>(above),</em></strong> and also just to the southwest over the eastern interior of Alaska <em><strong>(below)</em></strong>. These 2 VIIRS images use a different color enhancement, where the coldest surface IR brightness temperatures are darker blue.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, there was no surface air temperature report for Arctic Village <em>(station identifier PARC)</em> at this time, but the coldest surface IR brightness temperatures within some of the deeper valleys near that site was -58.4º C (-73.1º F). </p>
<p>To the south, a broad area of very cold <em>(dark blue)</em> surface IR brightness temperatures was seen across the <strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yukon_Flats" title="Yukon Flats (Wikipedia)">Yukon Flats</a></strong>, with a minimum value of -58.3º C (-72.9º F). The hourly surface air temperature at the Fort Yukon (PFYU) reporting station close to the time of the satellite image was -56º F, while the surface IR brightness temperature at that location was -54º F. Although there is not always a direct 1:1 correspondence between satellite-sensed IR surface temperature values and the actual air temperature measured within an instrument shelter at a height of 5 feet above ground level, the IR satellite imagery can be used to located areas that might have the coldest surface air temperatures.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120128_SUOMI_NPP_VIIRS_IR_AK_2.GIF"><img alt="Suomi NPP VIIRS 11.450 µm (Band I5) IR image" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120128_SUOMI_NPP_VIIRS_IR_AK_2.GIF" title="Suomi NPP VIIRS 11.450 µm (Band I5) IR image" width="480" height="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Suomi NPP VIIRS 11.450 µm (Band I5) IR image</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9672/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rain-cooled ground across much of Texas and Oklahoma</title>
		<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9670</link>
		<comments>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9670#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott.bachmeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy rain / flooding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MODIS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/?p=9670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maps of the 1-day total precipitation for 25 January and 26 January 2012 (above) showed that much of Texas and Oklahoma received several inches of rainfall during that 48 hour period. AWIPS images of the MODIS 0.65 µm visible channel and the corresponding  MODIS Land Surface Temperature (LST) product (below) revealed a large swath of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120125-26_precip_anim.gif"><img title="1-day observed precipitation for 25 and 26 January 2012" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120125-26_precip_anim.gif" alt="1-day observed precipitation for 25 and 26 January 2012" width="480" height="448" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">1-day observed precipitation for 25 and 26 January 2012</p></div>
<p>Maps of the 1-day total precipitation for <a title="25 January 2012 daily weather map" href="http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/dailywxmap/index_20120125.html"><strong>25 January</strong></a> and <a title="26 January 2012 daily weather map" href="http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/dailywxmap/index_20120126.html"><strong>26 January 2012</strong></a> <em><strong>(above)</strong></em> showed that much of Texas and Oklahoma received several inches of rainfall during that 48 hour period.</p>
<p>AWIPS images of the MODIS 0.65 µm visible channel and the corresponding  MODIS Land Surface Temperature (LST) product <em><strong>(below)</strong></em> revealed a large swath of rain-cooled ground across much of that region. LST values where heavy rain fell were in the 60s F <em>(yellow to light orange color enhancement),</em> in contrast to LST values in the 70s and 80s F <em>(darker orange to red color enhancement)</em> to the north and the to the south of the rain-cooled areas.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120126_modis_vis_lst_anim.gif"><img title="MODIS 0.65 µm visible chanel image + MODIS Land Surface Temperature product" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120126_modis_vis_lst_anim.gif" alt="MODIS 0.65 µm visible chanel image + MODIS Land Surface Temperature product" width="480" height="346" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS 0.65 µm visible chanel image + MODIS Land Surface Temperature product</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9670/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Detection of thin fog/stratus features: MODIS vs VIIRS</title>
		<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9661</link>
		<comments>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9661#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott.bachmeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arctic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fog detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MODIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suomi NPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIIRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/?p=9661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A comparison of AWIPS images of 1-km resolution Aqua MODIS 11.0 µm &#8220;IR Window&#8221; channel data (both grayscale, and color-enhanced) and the corresponding MODIS &#8220;Fog/stratus product&#8221; (above) showed some areas of fog and/or stratus cloud over the eastern half of Hudson Bay, Canada on 26 January 2012. On the fog/stratus product, low clouds and/or fog [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 491px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120126_modis_ir_fog_anim.gif"><img class="    " title="Aqua MODIS: 11.0 µm IR images (grayscale, and color-enhanced) +  &quot;Fog/stratus product&quot;" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120126_modis_ir_fog_anim.gif" alt="Aqua MODIS: 11.0 µm IR images (grayscale, and color-enhanced) +  &quot;Fog/stratus product&quot;" width="481" height="402" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Aqua MODIS: 11.0 µm IR images (grayscale, and color-enhanced) + &quot;Fog/stratus product&quot;</p></div>
<p>A comparison of AWIPS images of 1-km resolution <a title="Aqua" href="http://aqua.nasa.gov/"><strong>Aqua</strong></a> <a title="MODIS" href="http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/"><strong>MODIS</strong></a> 11.0 µm &#8220;IR Window&#8221; channel data <em>(both grayscale, and color-enhanced)</em> and the corresponding MODIS &#8220;Fog/stratus product&#8221; <em><strong>(above)</strong></em> showed some areas of fog and/or stratus cloud over the eastern half of Hudson Bay, Canada on <strong>26 January 2012</strong>. On the fog/stratus product, low clouds and/or fog appear as the yellow-to-red enhanced features, while cirrus cloud features appear darker black.</p>
<p>The primary feature of interest here is the very thin &#8211; almost &#8220;translucent&#8221; &#8211; patch of fog/stratus located in the upper center portion of the image, to the west of Akulivik <em>(station identifier CYKO)</em> and Povungnituq <em>(station identifier CYPX)</em>. The exact edges of this feature were difficult to identify in either the grayscale or the color-enhanced IR images &#8212; but the conventional &#8220;Fog/stratus product&#8221; <em>(simply the difference in IR brightness temperature between the 11.0 µm and 3.7 µm channel data)</em> allowed unambiguous identification of the edges.</p>
<p>About 45 minutes earlier, a similar comparison using McIDAS images of of 375-meter resolution <a title="Suomi NPP" href="http://npp.gsfc.nasa.gov/"><strong>Suomi NPP</strong></a> <a title="VIIRS" href="http://npp.gsfc.nasa.gov/viirs.html"><strong>VIIRS</strong></a> 11.450 µm IR data <em>(both grayscale, and color-enhanced)</em> and the corresponding VIIRS &#8220;Fog/stratus product&#8221; <em><strong>(below)</strong></em> showed much more detail associated with this particular thin fog/stratus feature. The higher spatial resolution allowed many more of the  ice leads to be seen &#8212; even some of the larger ones that were located below the thin fog/stratus feature.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120126_suomi_npp_viirs_ir_fog_hudson_bay_anim.gif"><img class=" " title="Suomi NPP VIIRS: 11.450 µm IR (grayscale, and color-enhanced) + &quot;Fog/stratus product&quot;" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120126_suomi_npp_viirs_ir_fog_hudson_bay_anim.gif" alt="Suomi NPP VIIRS: 11.450 µm IR (grayscale, and color-enhanced) + &quot;Fog/stratus product&quot;" width="480" height="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Suomi NPP VIIRS: 11.450 µm IR (grayscale, and color-enhanced) + &quot;Fog/stratus product&quot;</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9661/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Severe weather outbreak across the southeastern US</title>
		<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9615</link>
		<comments>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9615#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott.bachmeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AVHRR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOES-13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MODIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Severe convection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What the heck is this?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/?p=9615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A major outbreak of severe thunderstorms along a strong cold frontal boundary swept eastward across much of the southeastern US on 22 January &#8211; 23 January 2012, producing widespread damaging winds, large hail, and tornadoes (SPC storm reports). Two tornadoes produced EF-3 damage in Alabama. AWIPS images of 4-km resolution GOES-13 10.7 µm IR channel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a class="thumbnail" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120122-23_g13_ir_reports_large_anim.gif"><img class=" " title="GOES-13 10.7 µm IR channel images + severe weather reports (click image to play animation)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/US_IR_Sat_20120123_0132.png" alt="GOES-13 10.7 µm IR channel images + severe weather reports (click image to play animation)" width="480" height="454" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-13 10.7 µm IR channel images + severe weather reports (click image to play animation)</p></div>
<p>A major outbreak of severe thunderstorms along a strong cold frontal boundary swept eastward across much of the southeastern US on <a title="22 January 2012 daily weather map" href="http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/dailywxmap/index_20120122.html"><strong>22 January</strong></a> &#8211; <a title="23 January 2012 daily weather map" href="http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/dailywxmap/index_20120123.html"><strong>23 January 2012</strong></a>, producing widespread damaging winds, large hail, and tornadoes (<a title="SPC storm reports" href="http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/120122_rpts.html"><strong>SPC storm reports</strong></a>). Two tornadoes produced EF-3 damage in Alabama. AWIPS images of 4-km resolution GOES-13 10.7 µm IR channel data with overlays of severe weather reports <em><strong>(above; click image to play animation)</strong></em> showed the cold cloud top IR brightness temperatures of -60 to -70 C <em>(red to black color enhancement)</em> associated with some of the strongest storms. For more information, see summaries from the National Weather Service forecast offices at <a title="NWS Little Rock AR" href="http://www.srh.noaa.gov/lzk/?n=svr0112.htm"><strong>Litttle Rock AR</strong></a>, <a title="NWS Jackson MS" href="http://www.srh.noaa.gov/jan/?n=2012_01_22_severe"><strong>Jackson MS</strong></a>, and <a title="NWS Birmingham AL" href="http://www.srh.noaa.gov/graphicast.php?site=bmx&amp;gc=1"><strong>Birmingham AL</strong></a>.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120123_avhrr_modis_ir_anim.gif"><img title="POES AVHRR 12.0 µm and MODIS 11.0 µm IR images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120123_avhrr_modis_ir_anim.gif" alt="POES AVHRR 12.0 µm and MODIS 11.0 µm IR images" width="480" height="454" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">POES AVHRR 12.0 µm and MODIS 11.0 µm IR images</p></div>
<p>A sequence of 1-km resolution POES AVHRR 12.0 µm IR and MODIS 11.0 µm IR images <em><strong>(above)</strong></em> displayed greater detail in the storm top thermal structures, with a number of  -70 to -80 C <em>(black to light gray color enhancement)</em> IR brightness temperature values seen on the higher resolution imagery.</p>
<p>Of particular interest was what appeared to be some sort of &#8220;cloud trench&#8221; oriented from north to south across Tennessee around 08:00 UTC, which exhibited significantly warmer MODIS 11.0 µm IR brightness temperatures and a warmer/drier signal on the corresponding MODIS 6.7 µm water vapor image<em><strong> (below)</strong></em>. This feature was also apparent on a few of the 4-km resolution GOES-13 IR images around that time. The etiology of this satellite signature is unclear at this time.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 489px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120123_modis_ir_wv_zoom_anim.gif"><img title="MODIS 11.0 µm IR channel and 6.7 µm water vapor channel images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120123_modis_ir_wv_zoom_anim.gif" alt="MODIS 11.0 µm IR channel and 6.7 µm water vapor channel images" width="479" height="354" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS 11.0 µm IR channel and 6.7 µm water vapor channel images</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9615/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blowing dust in New Mexico, Texas, and Oklahoma</title>
		<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9601</link>
		<comments>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9601#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott.bachmeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fire detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOES-13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOES-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MODIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red/Green/Blue (RGB) images]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/?p=9601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A large outbreak of blowing dust developed in the wake of a cold frontal passage across parts of New Mexico, Texas, and Oklahoma on 22 January 2012. At Lubbock, Texas winds gusted to 60 mph, and surface visibility was reduced to 0.5 mile. The strongest wind gust was 77 mph, farther to the north in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a class="thumbnail" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120122_g15_vis_tx_anim.gif"><img class=" " title="GOES-15 0.63 µm visible channel images (click image to play animation)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120122_G15_VIS_TX_09.GIF" alt="GOES-15 0.63 µm visible channel images (click image to play animation)" width="480" height="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-15 0.63 µm visible channel images (click image to play animation)</p></div>
<p>A large outbreak of blowing dust developed in the wake of a cold frontal passage across parts of New Mexico, Texas, and Oklahoma on <strong>22 January 2012</strong>. At Lubbock, Texas winds gusted to 60 mph, and surface visibility was reduced to 0.5 mile. The strongest wind gust was 77 mph, farther to the north in the Texas panhandle region (<strong><a title="NWS Lubbock TX summary" href="http://www.srh.noaa.gov/lub/?n=events-2012-20120122-wind">NWS Lubbock summary</a></strong>). Early in the day, the consolidation of numerous smaller blowing dust plumes into a single large blowing dust &#8220;cloud&#8221; could be seen on 1-km resolution GOES-15 (GOES-West) 0.63 µm visible channel images <strong><em>(above; click image to play animation)</em></strong>.</p>
<p>Later in the day, due to a more favorable forward scattering angle, the areal extent of the airborne blowing dust could be better seen on 1-km resolution 0.63 µm visible channel images from the GOES-13 (GOES-East) satellite <strong><em>(below; click image to play animation)</em></strong>. The leading edge of the primary large dust plume began to move northeastward over Oklahoma, while a number of smaller dust plumes could be seen moving southeastward across the Oklahoma and Texas panhandle regions behind a secondary cold front. Note that the GOES-13 satellite had been placed into Rapid Scan Operations (RSO) mode, providing images as frequently as every 5-10 minutes.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a class="thumbnail" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120122_g13_vis_tx_dust_anim.gif"><img class=" " title="GOES-13 0.63 µm visible channel images (click image to play animation)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120122_G13_VIS_TX_DUST_26.GIF" alt="GOES-13 0.63 µm visible channel images (click image to play animation)" width="480" height="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-13 0.63 µm visible channel images (click image to play animation)</p></div>
<p>A 250-meter resolution MODIS <strong><a title="true color RGB imagery" href="http://lance.nasa.gov/imagery/rapid-response/frequently-asked-questions/#faq04">true color</a></strong> Red/Green/Blue (RGB) image from the <strong><a title="SSEC MODIS Today site" href="http://ge.ssec.wisc.edu/modis-today/index.php?satellite=a1&amp;product=true_color&amp;date=2012_01_22_022&amp;overlay_sector=false&amp;overlay_state=true&amp;overlay_coastline=true">SSEC MODIS Today</a></strong> site <strong><em>(below, viewed using Google Earth)</em></strong> displayed even greater detail in the structure of the blowig dust plume at 20:02 UTC.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120122_aqua_modis_treuclor_google.jpg"><img title="Aqua MODIS true color Red/Green/Blue (RGB) image (displayed using Google Earth)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120122_aqua_modis_treuclor_google.jpg" alt="Aqua MODIS true color Red/Green/Blue (RGB) image (displayed using Google Earth)" width="480" height="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Aqua MODIS true color Red/Green/Blue (RGB) image (displayed using Google Earth)</p></div>
<p>There was also a bit of smoke mixed in with the blowing dust, due to a few small wildfires that were burning across the region. Three small wildfire &#8220;hot spots&#8221; <em>(dark black to yellow pixels)</em> could be seen on an AWIPS image of 1-km resolution MODIS 3.7 µm shortwave IR data at 20:00 UTC <strong><em>(below)</em></strong>.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/MODIS_4_MICRON_20120122_2000.png"><img title="MODIS 3.7 µm shortwave IR image" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/MODIS_4_MICRON_20120122_2000.png" alt="MODIS 3.7 µm shortwave IR image" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS 3.7 µm shortwave IR image</p></div>
<p>Over southern Oklahoma at 21:23 UTC a pilot reported that at an altitude of 9000 feet the flight level visibility was zero due to blowing dust <strong><em>(below)</em></strong>.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120122_2140_g13_vis_pirep_ok.jpg"><img title="GOES-13 0.63 µm visible channel image + Aircraft pilot report" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120122_2140_g13_vis_pirep_ok.jpg" alt="GOES-13 0.63 µm visible channel image + Aircraft pilot report" width="480" height="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-13 0.63 µm visible channel image + Aircraft pilot report</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9601/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A comparison of GOES, AVHRR, MODIS, and VIIRS IR images</title>
		<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9590</link>
		<comments>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9590#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott.bachmeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AVHRR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOES-13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MODIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suomi NPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIIRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/?p=9590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AWIPS images of 4-km resolution GOES-13 10.7 µm IR data (above; click image to play animation) showed a variety of cloud features across the central and southern US between 07:01 UTC and 09:30 UTC on 19 January 2012. In particular, note (1) the darker gray (warmer) low clouds streaming northward from the Gulf of Mexico [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a class="thumbnail" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120119_g13_ir_anim.gif"><img class="  " title="GOES-13 10.7 µm IR images + surface frontal analysis (click image to play animation)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/US_IR_Sat_20120119_0831.png" alt="GOES-13 10.7 µm IR images + surface frontal analysis (click image to play animation)" width="480" height="355" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-13 10.7 µm IR images + surface frontal analysis (click image to play animation)</p></div>
<p>AWIPS images of 4-km resolution GOES-13 10.7 µm IR data <em><strong>(above; click image to play animation)</strong></em> showed a variety of cloud features across the central and southern US between 07:01 UTC and 09:30 UTC on <strong>19 January 2012</strong>. In particular, note <strong>(1)</strong> the darker gray <em>(warmer)</em> low clouds streaming northward from the Gulf of Mexico into Texas, signalling a northward return flow of low-level moisture (<a title="Blended Total Precipitable Water product" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Blended_TPW_20120119_0828.png"><strong>Total Precipitable Water values of 15-25 mm</strong></a>); <strong>(2)</strong> a large lighter gray <em>(colder)</em> banner cloud extending downwind of the Rocky Mountains, due to <a title="NAM 500 hPa winds" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/NAM80_500MB_Wind_20120119_0600F006.png"><strong>northwesterly flow aloft</strong></a> interacting with the high terrain; and  <strong>(3)</strong> a long lighter gray <em>(colder)</em> cloud band exhibiting some transverse banding, associated with a strong <a title="NAM Maximum wind speeds" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/NAM80_MaxWind_Windspeed_20120119_0600F006.png"><strong>165-knot core jet stream</strong></a> flowing southeastward from Nebraska to Tennessee.</p>
<p>Below are corresponding examples of 1-km resolution IR images from polar-orbiting satellites from the 08:22 to 08:43 UTC time period. The oldest &#8220;legacy&#8221; instrument is the <a title="AVHRR" href="http://noaasis.noaa.gov/NOAASIS/ml/avhrr.html"><strong>AVHRR</strong></a>, carried on the constellation of NOAA <a title="POES" href="http://www.oso.noaa.gov/poes/"><strong>POES</strong></a> satellites. A newer instrument is the <a title="MODIS" href="http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/"><strong>MODIS</strong></a>, carried on the NASA <a title="Aqua" href="http://aqua.nasa.gov/"><strong>Aqua</strong></a> and <a title="Terra" href="http://terra.nasa.gov/"><strong>Terra</strong></a> satellites. The most recently-launched satellite is the NASA <a title="NPP" href="http://npp.gsfc.nasa.gov/"><strong>NPP</strong></a>, which carries the <a title="VIIRS" href="http://npp.gsfc.nasa.gov/viirs.html"><strong>VIIRS</strong></a> instrument.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/AVHRR_VOL_IR_20120119_0848.png"><img title="POES AVHRR 12.0 µm IR image" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/AVHRR_VOL_IR_20120119_0848.png" alt="POES AVHRR 12.0 µm IR image" width="480" height="355" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">POES AVHRR 12.0 µm IR image</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/MODIS_IR_20120119_0822_gray.png"><img class=" " title="Aqua MODIS 11.0 µm IR image" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/MODIS_IR_20120119_0822_gray.png" alt="Aqua MODIS 11.0 µm IR image" width="480" height="355" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Aqua MODIS 11.0 µm IR image</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/viirs_ir_20120119_t08.jpg"><img title="NPP VIIRS M15 10.763 µm IR image" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/viirs_ir_20120119_t08.jpg" alt="NPP VIIRS M15 10.763 µm IR image" width="480" height="447" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">NPP VIIRS M15 10.763 µm IR image</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120119_0825z_viirs_m15_ir_us.jpg"><img title="NPP VIIRS 10.763 µm IR image (viewed using Google Earth)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120119_0825z_viirs_m15_ir_us.jpg" alt="NPP VIIRS 10.763 µm IR image (viewed using Google Earth)" width="480" height="309" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">NPP VIIRS 10.763 µm IR image (viewed using Google Earth)</p></div>
<p>Images such as these from polar-orbiting satellites are available less frequently that those from <a title="GOES" href="http://www.oso.noaa.gov/goes/"><strong>GOES</strong></a>, but they offer a more detailed view of cloud features due to improved spatial resolution. The more modern instruments such as MODIS and VIIRS also contain many more channels (or spectral bands) than are available from the current generation of GOES satellites. These additional bands allow the creation of a variety of quantitative satellite products.</p>
<p>For example, if we focus our attention on the low cloud features in Texas, using MODIS data we can be more descriptive in terms of the<a title="Cloud Type product" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/MODIS_CLD_TYPE_20120119_0824.png"> <strong>Cloud Type</strong></a> <em>(water),</em> <a title="Fog Depth product" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/MODIS_FOG_DEPTH_20120119_0824.png"><strong>Fog Depth</strong></a> <em>(as deep as 1300 feet),</em> and <a title="Probability of MVFR product" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/MODIS_MVFR_PROB_20120119_0824.png"><strong>Probability of Marginal Visual Flight Rules MVFR</strong></a> <em>(as high as 70-80%)</em> or <a title="Probability of IFR product" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/MODIS_IFR_PROB_20120119_0824.png"><strong>Probability of Instrument Flight Rules IFR</strong></a> <em>(as high as 50-60%)</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9590/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strong cold front and a lee-side frontal gravity wave</title>
		<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9582</link>
		<comments>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9582#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott.bachmeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOES-13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MODIS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/?p=9582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A strong cold front moved southward across the south-central US on 17 January 2012, dropping temperatures as much as 20 degrees F in 1-2 hours with wind gusts of 30-40 knots. The cold air behind the front (lighter gray enhancement) was clearly evident on AWIPS images of 4-km resolution GOES-13 10.7 µm IR channel data [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a class="thumbnail" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120117_g13_ir_cold_front_anim.gif"><img class=" " title="GOES-13 10.7 µm IR channel images (click image to play animation)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/US_IR_Sat_20120117_1010.png" alt="GOES-13 10.7 µm IR channel images (click image to play animation)" width="480" height="450" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-13 10.7 µm IR channel images (click image to play animation)</p></div>
<p>A strong cold front moved southward across the south-central US on <a title="17 January 2012 daily weather map" href="http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/dailywxmap/index_20120117.html"><strong>17 January 2012</strong></a>, dropping temperatures as much as 20 degrees F in 1-2 hours with wind gusts of 30-40 knots. The cold air behind the front <em>(lighter gray enhancement)</em> was clearly evident on AWIPS images of 4-km resolution GOES-13 10.7 µm IR channel data <em><strong>(above; click image to play animation)</strong></em>.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a class="thumbnail" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120117_g13_wv_cold_front_anim.gif"><img class=" " title="GOES-13 6.5 µm water vapor channel images (click image to play animation)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/US_Water_Vapor_20120117_1010.png" alt="GOES-13 6.5 µm water vapor channel images (click image to play animation)" width="480" height="450" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-13 6.5 µm water vapor channel images (click image to play animation)</p></div>
<p>As the <a title="Cold frontal surface analysis overlaid on GOES-13 water vapor images" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120117_g13_wv_fronts_anim.gif"><strong>cold front moved southward</strong></a>, a <em>lee-side cold frontal gravity wave</em> was seen along its leading edge on 4-km resolution GOES-13 6.5 µm water vapor channel images <em><strong>(above; click image to play animation)</strong></em>. Note the very complex wave structure that was displayed on a 1-km resolution MODIS 6.7 µm water vapor channel image at 08:34 UTC <em><strong>(below)</strong></em>. In addition, the MODIS water vapor image showed great detail in the mountain waves across parts of New Mexico and far southwestern Texas, as strong westerly flow was interacting with the terrain in that region.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120117_modis_wv_cold_front_anim.gif"><img title="MODIS 6.7 µm water vapor channel image + Surface frontal analysis" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120117_modis_wv_cold_front_anim.gif" alt="MODIS 6.7 µm water vapor channel image + Surface frontal analysis" width="480" height="450" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS 6.7 µm water vapor channel image + Surface frontal analysis</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120117_jayton_profiler_anim.gif"><img title="Jayton, Texas NOAA Wind Profiler time series" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120117_jayton_profiler_anim.gif" alt="Jayton, Texas NOAA Wind Profiler time series" width="480" height="450" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Jayton, Texas NOAA Wind Profiler time series</p></div>
<p>As the cold front passed the Jayton, Texas NOAA wind profiler site (<a title="NOAA wind profiler site locations" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120117_g13_wv_fronts_anim.gif"><strong>station identifier JTNT2</strong></a>) after about 12 UTC, the transition to a northeasterly flow of cold air was evident <em><strong>(above)</strong></em>. Even though the depth of the cold air was not more than about 1.5 km, the lee-side cold frontal gravity wave was able to be seen on the water vapor imagery due to the fact that the cold, dry air mass shifted the peak of the GOES-13 water vapor <a title="GOES weighting function site" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/wf/"><strong>weighting function</strong></a> down to within the 700-500 hPa pressure level &#8212; much lower than the height of the water vapor weighting function of the US Standard Atmosphere air mass <em><strong>(below)</strong></em>.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120117_kama_ussa_wv_wf_anim.gif"><img title="Amarillo, Texas water vapor weighting function vs US Standard Atmosphere water vapor weighting function" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120117_kama_ussa_wv_wf_anim.gif" alt="Amarillo, Texas water vapor weighting function vs US Standard Atmosphere water vapor weighting function" width="480" height="284" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Amarillo, Texas water vapor weighting function vs US Standard Atmosphere water vapor weighting function</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9582/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snow cover across west Texas and southeast New Mexico</title>
		<link>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9536</link>
		<comments>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9536#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott.bachmeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GOES-13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOES-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MODIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red/Green/Blue (RGB) images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/?p=9536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Snowfall amounts as high as 10-15 inches fell across parts of west Texas and southeast New Mexico on 09 January 2012 as a strong upper level disturbance moved across that region (NWS Lubbock TX storm summary). On the following morning, a comparison of GOES-15 (GOES-West) and GOES-13 (GOES-East) 0.63 µm visible channel images (above; click [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a class="thumbnail" href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120110_g15_g13_vis_tx_snow_anim.gif"><img class=" " title="GOES-15 (GOES-West) and GOES-13 (GOES-East) 0.63 µm visible images (click image to play animation)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120110_G15_G13_VIS_TX_SNOW_06.GIF" alt="GOES-15 (GOES-West) and GOES-13 (GOES-East) 0.63 µm visible images (click image to play animation)" width="480" height="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GOES-15 (GOES-West) and GOES-13 (GOES-East) 0.63 µm visible images (click image to play animation)</p></div>
<p>Snowfall amounts as high as 10-15 inches fell across parts of west Texas and southeast New Mexico on <a title="09 January 2012 daily weather map" href="http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/dailywxmap/index_20120109.html"><strong>09 January 2012</strong></a> as a strong upper level disturbance moved across that region (<strong><a href="http://www.srh.noaa.gov/lub/?n=events-2012-20120109-snow" title="NWS Lubbock TX storm summary">NWS Lubbock TX storm summary</a></strong>). On the following morning, a comparison of GOES-15 (GOES-West) and GOES-13 (GOES-East) 0.63 µm visible channel images <em><strong>(above; click image to play animation)</strong></em> showed the areal coverage of the snow cover that remained on the ground. Note how the patch of snow began to melt from the outer edges inward as the full day of sunshine warmed the ground surface. Also note the curious &#8220;donut hole&#8221; of bare ground on the northern end of the main snow cover &#8212; this feature rapidly disappeared, as the snow depth associated with this feature was not very high.</p>
<p>A comparison of 250-meter resolution MODIS true color and false color Red/Green/Blue (RGB) images from the <a title="SSEC MODIS Today site" href="http://ge.ssec.wisc.edu/modis-today/index.php?satellite=t1&amp;product=true_color&amp;date=2012_01_10_010&amp;overlay_sector=false&amp;overlay_state=true&amp;overlay_coastline=true"><strong>SSEC MODIS Today</strong></a> site <em><strong>(below)</strong></em> showed greater detail in the snow cover <em>(snow on the ground appears as darker shades of cyan on the false color image)</em> at 18:02 UTC.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120110_modis_truecolor_falsecolor_tx_snow_anim.gif"><img title="MODIS true color and false color Red/Green/Blue (RGB) images" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120110_modis_truecolor_falsecolor_tx_snow_anim.gif" alt="MODIS true color and false color Red/Green/Blue (RGB) images" width="480" height="292" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS true color and false color Red/Green/Blue (RGB) images</p></div>
<p>A comparison of AWIPS images of MODIS 0.65 µm visible channel data and the corresponding false color RGB image <em><strong>(below)</strong></em> offered another tool that can be used to discriminate between snow cover <em>(which in this example appears as darker shades of red on the false color image)</em> and supercooled water droplet clouds <em>(which appeared as varying shades of white)</em>.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120110_modis_vis_rgb_anim.gif"><img title="MODIS 0.65 µm visible image + MODIS false color RGB image" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120110_modis_vis_rgb_anim.gif" alt="MODIS 0.65 µm visible image + MODIS false color RGB image" width="480" height="450" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS 0.65 µm visible image + MODIS false color RGB image</p></div>
<p>A comparison of the MODIS 0.65 µm visible image with the corresponding MODIS Land Surface Temperature (LST) product <em><strong>(below)</strong></em> revealed how the deep snow cover was helping to keep surface air temperatures significantly colder than adjacent regions with bare ground. MODIS LST values were in the low to middle 30s F across the deeper snow cover, in the upper 40s to low 50s F in the &#8220;donut hole&#8221; region where the snow had just melted, and in the 60s F to the north over bare ground. Also note how the urban areas of Midland and Odessa stand out in the LST image, with LST values in the low to middle 40s F.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120110_modis_vis_lst_anim.gif"><img title="MODIS 0.65 µm visible image + MODIS Land Surface Temperature product" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120110_modis_vis_lst_anim.gif" alt="MODIS 0.65 µm visible image + MODIS Land Surface Temperature product" width="480" height="450" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS 0.65 µm visible image + MODIS Land Surface Temperature product</p></div>
<p>The mechanism for the creation of the &#8220;donut hole&#8221; snow cover feature is unclear at this point. A comparison the MODIS Land Surface Temperature product with the regional topography <em><strong>(below)</strong></em> seems to suggest that this feature was not topographically-driven.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120110_modis_lst_topo_anim.gif"><img class=" " title="MODIS Land Surface Temperature product + Topography" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120110_modis_lst_topo_anim.gif" alt="MODIS Land Surface Temperature product + Topography" width="480" height="451" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS Land Surface Temperature product + Topography</p></div>
<p>The MODIS true color image viewed using Google Earth <em><strong>(below)</strong></em> showed that the community of Brownfield <em>(which did received about an inch of snowfall the previous day)</em> was aptly named, being located within the brown-colored snow-free region at 18:02 UTC.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120110_modis_truecolor_google.jpg"><img title="MODIS true color image (viewed using Google Earth)" src="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/120110_modis_truecolor_google.jpg" alt="MODIS true color image (viewed using Google Earth)" width="480" height="291" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MODIS true color image (viewed using Google Earth)</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/9536/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

