Sensitivity of
the CLAVR-x Cloud Amount/Type Products to the Seasonal Cycle
The goal of this pages to present evidence of how
the CLAVR-x cloud amount and cloud type products respond to seasonal cycle.
In the analysis, we are only using data from July and January. We
have chosen one July and one January month from several of the afternoon
polar orbiters and selected months with the same equator crossing time
to avoid issues concerned with satellite orbit drift. The effective
equator crossing for all data is within 30 minutes of 3:00 PM. The
equator crossing times are shown below with times of the months used in
this analysis plotted as triangles. The July data are taken from 1982,
1986, 1991, and 1998. The January data are taken from 1983, 1987, 1992, and
1999.
This analysis focuses on the performance of frontend
CLAVR-x processor that runs the pixel level cloud mask and cloud typing algorithms.
The sensitivity to the seasonal cycle within the other CLAVR-x suite
of cloud properties will also be analyzed.
- 0 - clear
- 1 - partly clear
- 2 - warm water cloud
- 3 - super cooled water cloud
- 4 - opaque ice cloud
- 5 - non overlapped cirrus cloud
- 6 - overlapped cirrus cloud
Global Fields from CLAVR-x for mean July and January (1982-3, 1986-7, 1991-2, 1998-9) Ascending Data from the Afternoon Satellites (NOAA-7,9,11 &14)
| July mean |
July Std. Dev. |
January mean |
January Std. Dev. |
July-January mean |
|
| Total Cloud |
view |
view |
view |
view |
view |
| Water Cloud |
view |
view |
view |
view |
view |
| Ice Cloud |
view |
view |
view |
view |
view |
| Warm Water Cloud |
view |
view |
view |
view |
view |
| Super-cooled Water Cloud |
view |
view |
view |
view |
view |
| Opaque Ice Cloud |
view |
view |
view |
view |
view |
| Non-overlapped Cirrus Cloud |
view |
view |
view |
view |
view |
| Overlapped Cirrus Cloud |
view |
view |
view |
view |
view |
Presented here are some analogous plots to those above derived the ISCCP data. This data is taken from global monthly means available on-line from the ISCCP website. The water cloud fraction was computed as the sum of the low and mid level water cloud amount (there was no high water cloud amount). The ice cloud fraction is derived from the subtraction of the water from the total. Note, the web site provided only daytime data but the total cloud amount is a diurnal average. Therefore, the derivation of the ice cloud amounts may be incorrect. ISCCP is a daytime average while CLAVR-x results are for a local time of approximately 3:00 PM.
Comparison to ISCCP mean July and January Values.
| July mean |
January mean |
July-January
mean |
|
| Total Cloud |
view |
view |
view |
| Water Cloud |
view |
view |
view |
| Ice Cloud |
view |
view |
view |
Conclusions from these Results
- There is more agreement in the seasonal cycle then there is the actual monthly cloud amounts between ISCCP and CLAVR-x.
- The July - January differences in the polar regions between CLAVR-x and ISCCP are reversed. CLAVR-x sees more cloud in the Arctic in July than January and sees more cloud in the Antarctic in January than July - ISCCP is the opposite.
- The seasonal cycle in overlapped cirrus is consistent with notion that overlapped cirrus are most often associated midlatitude cyclones and deep tropical convection.
- There is a weakness in the overlap cirrus detection over snow. This can be filtered out since we produce a snow fraction but this was not done in these images.
- The largest standard deviations in cloudiness are found in
central tropical pacific region. The cause of this is probably ENSO
related - the years chosen occur within different parts of the ENSO cycle.